Breaking News Stories
These are news stories breaking after the publishing of this Word
from.
– China, Growing Superpower
Chinese dragon awakens
By Bill Gertz - THE WASHINGTON TIMES
China is building its military forces faster than U.S. intelligence and
military analysts expected, prompting fears that Beijing will attack
Taiwan in the next two years, according to Pentagon officials.
U.S. defense and intelligence officials say all the signs point in one
troubling direction: Beijing then will be forced to go to war with the
United States, which has vowed to defend Taiwan against a Chinese
attack.
| For China, Taiwan is not the only issue behind the buildup of military
forces. Beijing also is facing a major energy shortage that, according
to one Pentagon study, could lead it to use military force to seize
territory with oil and gas resources. |
China's military buildup includes an array of new high-technology
weapons, such as warships, submarines, missiles and a maneuverable
warhead designed to defeat U.S. missile defenses. Recent intelligence
reports also show that China has stepped up military exercises involving
amphibious assaults, viewed as another sign that it is preparing for an
attack on Taiwan.
"There's a growing consensus that at some point in the mid-to-late '90s,
there was a fundamental shift in the sophistication, breadth and
re-sorting of Chinese defense planning," said Richard Lawless, a senior
China-policy maker in the Pentagon. "And what we're seeing now is a
manifestation of that change in the number of new systems that are being
deployed, the sophistication of those systems and the interoperability
of the systems."
China's economy has been growing at a rate of at least 10 percent for
each of the past 10 years, providing the country's military with the
needed funds for modernization.
The combination of a vibrant centralized economy, growing military and
increasingly fervent nationalism has transformed China into what many
defense officials view as a fascist state.
"We may be seeing in China the first true fascist society on the model
of Nazi Germany, where you have this incredible resource base in a
commercial economy with strong nationalism, which the military was able
to reach into and ramp up incredible production," a senior defense
official said.
For Pentagon officials, alarm bells have been going off for the past two
years as China's military began rapidly building and buying new troop-
and weapon-carrying ships and submarines.
The release of an official Chinese government report in December called
the situation on the Taiwan Strait "grim" and said the country's
military could "crush" Taiwan.
| We may be seeing in China
the first true fascist society on the model of Nazi Germany, |
Earlier this year, Beijing passed an anti-secession law, a unilateral
measure that upset the fragile political status quo across the Taiwan
Strait. The law gives Chinese leaders a legal basis they previously did
not have to conduct a military attack on Taiwan, U.S. officials said.
The war fears come despite the fact that China is hosting the Olympic
Games in 2008 and, therefore, some officials say, would be reluctant to
invoke the international condemnation that a military attack on Taiwan
would cause.
Army of the future
In the past, some defense specialists insisted a Chinese attack on
Taiwan would be a "million-man swim" across the Taiwan Strait because of
the country's lack of troop-carrying ships.
"We left the million-man swim behind in about 1998, 1999," the senior
Pentagon official said. "And in fact, what people are saying now,
whether or not that construct was ever useful, is that it's a moot
point, because in just amphibious lift alone, the Chinese are doubling
or even quadrupling their capability on an annual basis."
Asked about a possible Chinese attack on Taiwan, the official put it
bluntly: "In the '07-'08 time frame, a capability will be there that a
year ago we would have said was very, very unlikely. We now assess that
as being very likely to be there."
Air Force Gen. Paul V. Hester, head of the Pacific Air Forces, said the
U.S. military has been watching China's military buildup but has found
it difficult to penetrate Beijing's "veil" of secrecy over it.
While military modernization itself is not a major worry, "what does
provide you a pause for interest and concern is the amount of
modernization, the kind of modernization and the size of the
modernization," he said during a recent breakfast meeting with
reporters.
China is building capabilities such as aerial refueling and airborne
warning and control aircraft that can be used for regional defense and
long-range power projection, Gen. Hester said.
It also is developing a maneuverable re-entry vehicle, or MARV, for its
nuclear warheads. The weapon is designed to counter U.S.
strategic-missile defenses, according to officials who spoke on the
condition of anonymity. The warhead would be used on China's new DF-31
long-range missiles and its new submarine missile, the JL-2.
Work being done on China's weapons and reconnaissance systems will give
its military the capability to reach 1,000 miles into the sea, "which
gives them the visibility on the movement of not only our airplanes in
the air, but also our forces at sea," Gen. Hester said.
Beijing also has built a new tank for its large armed forces. It is
known as the Type 99 and appears similar in design to Germany's Leopard
2 main battle tank. The tank is outfitted with new artillery,
anti-aircraft and machine guns, advanced fire-control systems and
improved engines.
The country's air power is growing through the purchase of new fighters
from Russia, such as Su-30 fighter-bombers, as well as the development
of its own fighter jets, such as the J-10.
Gen. Hester compared Chinese warplanes with those of the former Soviet
Union, which were less capable than their U.S. counterparts, but still
very deadly.
"They have great equipment. The fighters are very technologically
advanced, and what we know about them gives us pause for concern against
ours," he said.
Missiles also are a worry.
"It is their surface-to-air missiles, their [advanced] SAMs and their
surface-to-surface missiles, and the precision, more importantly, of
those surface-to-surface missiles that provide, obviously, the ability
to pinpoint targets that we might have out in the region, or our friends
and allies might have," Gen. Hester said.
The advances give the Chinese military "the ability ... to reach out and
touch parts of the United States -- Guam, Hawaii and the mainland of the
United States," he said.
To better deal with possible future conflicts in Asia, the Pentagon is
modernizing U.S. military facilities on the Western Pacific island of
Guam and planning to move more forces there.
The Air Force will regularly rotate Air Expeditionary Force units to
Guam and also will station the new long-range unmanned aerial vehicle
known as Global Hawk on the island, he said.
It also has stationed B-2 stealth bombers on Guam temporarily and is
expected to deploy B-1 bombers there, in addition to the B-52s now
deployed there, Gen. Hester said.
Projecting power
China's rulers have adopted what is known as the "two-island chain"
strategy of extending control over large areas of the Pacific, covering
inner and outer chains of islands stretching from Japan to Indonesia.
"Clearly, they are still influenced by this first and second island
chain," the intelligence official said.
The official said China's buildup goes beyond what would be needed to
fight a war against Taiwan.
The conclusion of this official is that China wants a "blue-water" navy
capable of projecting power far beyond the two island chains.
"If you look at the technical capabilities of the weapons platforms that
they're fielding, the sea-keeping capabilities, the size, sensors and
weapons fit, this capability transcends the baseline that is required to
deal with a Taiwan situation militarily," the intelligence official
said.
"So they are positioned then, if [Taiwan is] resolved one way or the
other, to really become a regional military power as well."
The dispatch of a Han-class submarine late last year to waters near
Guam, Taiwan and Japan was an indication of the Chinese military's drive
to expand its oceangoing capabilities, the officials said. The submarine
surfaced in Japanese waters, triggering an emergency deployment of
Japan's naval forces.
Beijing later issued an apology for the incursion, but the political
damage was done. Within months, Japan began adopting a tougher political
posture toward China in its defense policies and public statements. A
recent Japanese government defense report called China a strategic
national security concern. It was the first time China was named
specifically in a Japanese defense report.
Energy supply a factor
For China, Taiwan is not the only issue behind the buildup of military
forces. Beijing also is facing a major energy shortage that, according
to one Pentagon study, could lead it to use military force to seize
territory with oil and gas resources.
The report produced for the Office of Net Assessment, which conducts
assessments of future threats, was made public in January and warned
that China's need for oil, gas and other energy resources is driving the
country toward becoming an expansionist power.
China "is looking not only to build a blue-water navy to control the sea
lanes [from the Middle East], but also to develop undersea mines and
missile capabilities to deter the potential disruption of its energy
supplies from potential threats, including the U.S. Navy, especially in
the case of a conflict with Taiwan," the report said.
The report said China believes the United States already controls the
sea routes from the oil-rich Persian Gulf through the Malacca Strait.
Chinese President Hu Jintao has called this strategic vulnerability to
disrupted energy supplies Beijing's "Malacca Dilemma."
To prevent any disruption, China has adopted a "string of pearls"
strategy that calls for both offensive and defensive measures stretching
along the oil-shipment sea lanes from China's coast to the Middle East.
The "pearls" include the Chinese-financed seaport being built at Gwadar,
on the coast of western Pakistan, and commercial and military efforts to
establish bases or diplomatic ties in Bangladesh, Burma, Cambodia,
Thailand and disputed islands in the South China Sea.
The report stated that China's ability to use these pearls for a
"credible" military action is not certain.
Pentagon intelligence officials, however, say the rapid Chinese naval
buildup includes the capability to project power to these sea lanes in
the future.
"They are not doing a lot of surface patrols or any other kind of
security evolutions that far afield," the intelligence official said.
"There's no evidence of [Chinese military basing there] yet, but we do
need to keep an eye toward that expansion."
The report also highlighted the vulnerability of China's oil and gas
infrastructure to a crippling U.S. attack.
"The U.S. military could severely cripple Chinese resistance [during a
conflict over Taiwan] by blocking its energy supply, whereas the
[People's Liberation Army navy] poses little threat to United States'
energy security," it said.
China views the United States as "a potential threat because of its
military superiority, its willingness to disrupt China's energy imports,
its perceived encirclement of China and its disposition toward
manipulating international politics," the report said.
'Mercantilist measures'
The report stated that China will resort "to extreme, offensive and
mercantilist measures when other strategies fail, to mitigate its
vulnerabilities, such as seizing control of energy resources in
neighboring states."
U.S. officials have said two likely targets for China are the Russian
Far East, which has vast oil and gas deposits, and Southeast Asia, which
also has oil and gas resources.
Michael Pillsbury, a former Pentagon official and specialist on China's
military, said the internal U.S. government debate on the issue and
excessive Chinese secrecy about its military buildup "has cost us 10
years to figure out what to do"
"Everybody is starting to acknowledge the hard facts," Mr. Pillsbury
said. "The China military buildup has been accelerating since 1999. As
the buildup has gotten worse, China is trying hard to mask it."
Richard Fisher, vice president of the International Assessment and
Strategy Center, said that in 10 years, the Chinese army has shifted
from a defensive force to an advanced military soon capable of
operations ranging from space warfare to global non-nuclear
cruise-missile strikes.
"Let's all wake up. The post-Cold War peace is over," Mr. Fisher said.
"We are now in an arms race with a new superpower whose goal is to
contain and overtake the United States."
China is stepping up its overt and covert efforts to gather intelligence
and technology in the United States, and the activities have boosted
Beijing's plans to rapidly produce advanced-weapons systems.
"I think you see it where something that would normally take 10 years to
develop takes them two or three," said David Szady, chief of FBI
counterintelligence operations.
He said the Chinese are prolific collectors of secrets and
military-related information.
"What we're finding is that [the spying is] much more focused in certain
areas than we ever thought, such as command and control and things of
that sort," Mr. Szady said.
"In the military area, the rapid development of their 'blue-water' navy
-- like the Aegis weapons systems -- in no small part is probably due to
some of the research and development they were able to get from the
United States," he said.
The danger of Chinese technology acquisition is that if the United
States were called on to fight a war with China over the Republic of
China (Taiwan), U.S. forces could find themselves battling a
U.S.-equipped enemy.
"I would hate for my grandson to be killed with U.S. technology" in a
war over Taiwan, senior FBI counterintelligence official Tim Bereznay
told a conference earlier this year.
|