Breaking News Stories
These are news stories breaking after the publishing of this Word
from.
– Internet Take Over?
The Unaccountable Internet Police
Chris Evans - Internet Freedom
Last June, the Internet Watch Foundation (IWF) announced a partnership
with the Metropolitan Police’s Paedophile Unit. The IWF is probably the
most powerful Internet censorship body in the UK. Since its foundation
in 1996, the IWF has presented itself as ensuring offline legislation is
enforced online. They have gone to great lengths to portray themselves
as independent, non-governmental and without statutory power. They even
managed to enlist Malcolm Hutty, Head of the Campaign Against Censorship
of the Internet in Great Britain, to their Board.
How things have changed. Now the IWF have no qualms about admitting to
being a major part of the police’s efforts to clamp down on the Net and
they receive funding from the EU. The IWF instructs ISPs to remove
material and the Internet Service Provider’s Association forces members
to comply. Last year 2,930 such instructions were issued. By their own
admission over 90% of the material would not have been actionable in UK
courts.
The IWF have been keen to respond to every act of paedophilia, issuing
press releases indicating that they are doing everything in their
(considerable) power to clamp down on child pornography. Like the
anti-pornography campaigns of a bygone era, they rely on attempting to
equate physical abuse with pornography. But as Guardian writer Ian
Buruma commented on the recent jailing of Michael Kelly, “he abused only
himself, with the help of 18,000 images in the privacy of his own room.
Not a pretty picture, perhaps, but a pathetic rather than a criminal
one.”
In February, Malcolm Hutty resigned from the IWF, claiming they were
“not prepared to listen to criticism” for their plans to increase their
efforts to censor perfectly legal material. ISP representative Clive
Feather had already resigned in December last year, citing similar
complaints. Chief Executive Peter Robbins insists that the IWF are
accountable for their actions. Not to the public, of course. But to
what’s left of the Board.
|