News Stories
These are news stories breaking after the publishing of this Word
from.
Pivotal Pakistan
For Now, Musharraf Has
Muzzled Legal Critics in Pakistan
New York Times
KARACHI, Pakistan — Not so long ago, Muneer A. Malik was often
photographed sitting on the roof of a Mitsubishi Pajero, fists raised,
showered with rose petals and thronged by supporters as he accompanied
the embattled Supreme Court chief justice on protest cavalcades that
became the starkest symbol of opposition to President Pervez Musharraf’s
rule.
Today, Mr. Malik, a lawyer who helped lead the movement of his
colleagues, goes nowhere but the hospital and home. He is frail, his
face is drawn, he walks through his house slowly and cautiously. He says
he is happy to be alive.
For speaking out against President Musharraf, whom the United States has
held up as its bulwark against Islamic militancy in this country, Mr.
Malik spent three weeks in jail, where his kidneys failed and he ended
up, he says, close to death. He said his doctors told him it was a
combination of dehydration, malnutrition and the presence of unknown
toxins in his body. Only recently, after more than a month spent in and
out of the hospital, medical tests confirmed that he was out of danger.
He is now also free to talk. The government’s detention order against
him was lifted Nov. 26, while he lay in a hospital in the capital,
Islamabad.
Some of his closest lawyer friends have not been as lucky, as Mr.
Musharraf has muzzled his legal critics, at least for now. Since Nov. 3,
when the president declared an emergency and dismissed the Supreme
Court, Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, who had been the chief justice, has
been prohibited from leaving his house in Islamabad; his family is
locked up with him, and their street is heavily guarded.
Mr. Malik’s friend and the main leader of the lawyers movement, a
veteran lawyer-politician named Aitzaz Ahsan, is under house arrest in
Lahore, prohibited from speaking to outsiders, including the American
and British ambassadors to Pakistan, both of whom came to meet him at
home in recent weeks and were turned back.
Two other leaders of the lawyers movement, Ali Ahmed Kurd, of Quetta,
and Tariq Mehmood, of Islamabad, are also under house arrest. None of
these leaders can talk to one another, except covertly. A protest strike
by lawyers has begun to fizzle out. Mr. Malik said young lawyers in
particular had been compelled to return to work and make a living.
On Wednesday night, Mr. Malik sounded unbowed.
“Repression increases as the strength of the movement grows,” he said at
his home, dressed in loose white pajamas rather than his customary
lawyer’s black coat. “Finally, one or the other has to break, but
history teaches us the right always prevails in the end.”
The lawyers movement began last spring with the suspension of the chief
justice, Mr. Chaudhry, who had dogged Mr. Musharraf’s government on a
range of issues, from human rights to the validity of elections. Mr.
Chaudhry became a symbol of judicial independence, and Mr. Musharraf
endured months of protests by black-coated men and women across the
country. Four months later, the president backed down and reinstated Mr.
Chaudhry to his post.
Then, last November, days before Mr. Chaudhry’s court was expected to
rule that Mr. Musharraf was ineligible for a third term in office, the
president declared a state of emergency. He accused the court of
meddling in state affairs, and had Mr. Chaudhry escorted out of his
office and the leaders of the lawyers movement rounded up on orders of
preventive detention.
Mr. Malik said his arrest warrant described him as “likely to make
inflammatory speeches.” He was plucked from a hotel in Islamabad, where
he had gone to appear on a television program, and taken to a jail in
Rawalpindi, where Mr. Ahsan was already in the next cell. “He was
delighted to see me,” Mr. Malik recalled.
The two men had been jailed years ago for bucking the military rule of
Gen. Mohammad Zia ul-Haq. Jail itself was not a frightening thing.
But as Mr. Malik says now, he did not anticipate what came after. Three
days later, in the middle of the night, he said, he was taken from
Rawalpindi to another jail, in Attock, where he was held in a tiny cell.
When allowed out, he repeatedly walked 60 steps from one end of the yard
to the other, so he could at least stretch his legs. He was allowed no
books, no newspapers. A table and two chairs were placed in the middle
of his cell, as if to constantly remind him that he would be
interrogated. He never was.
“All I could do was lie down in that cell,” he recalled. “From one end
to the other you could barely take four steps.”
He was in solitary confinement for the first two days, and on a hunger
strike. Slowly, the jail filled up with other lawyers and political
workers. And then, one by one, everyone was released, except him.
He could sleep only with sleeping pills, which the doctor at the jail
prescribed. He was also given heavy pain killers, after complaining of
problems urinating. Within days, his legs and stomach had begun to
swell. He became short of breath. He became so disoriented that he was
losing chronological memory. “If you asked me to recap what happened, I
couldn’t,” he said. “I was all alone. All the people who had been
detained were all released.”
On Nov. 23, he was transferred to an Islamabad hospital, then to
Karachi, where he underwent repeated dialysis treatments. He plans to go
to the United States for toxicology tests.
For now, he concedes, the lawyers movement seems to be on hold. Its
leaders are prevented from talking to one another. The assassination of
Benazir Bhutto has transformed the political landscape. Restrictions on
the Pakistani media, Mr. Malik said, have pinched the lawyers’ efforts
to publicize their campaign. Since Nov. 3, Pakistan’s largest television
news network, Geo News, has been off the air, and it remains unclear
whether it will be allowed to resume operations in time for elections,
now scheduled for Feb. 18.
“We have to change tactics,” Mr. Malik said. “It’s now or never. If we
don’t succeed by February, we will not have any kind of judiciary.”
|