News Stories
These are news stories breaking after the publishing of this Word
from.–
Temple Mount and the Ultimate Nightmare
Building Minaret on Temple Mount
'Dangerous' Move, Expert Says
By Julie Stahl - CNSNews.com Jerusalem Bureau Chief
Jerusalem - Building a fifth minaret on the Temple Mount in Jerusalem is
a dangerous move because it jeopardizes the religious status quo there,
an expert in Jerusalem said.
Local press reports this week indicated that Jordanian religious
officials, who oversee the Islamic shrines on the Temple Mount, are
planning to build a fifth minaret at the site, known to Muslims as the
Haram al-Sharif.
The ancient plateau is a hotly contested issue in the
Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The site of two consecutive Jewish
temples, the second of which was destroyed by the Romans in 70 AD, now
houses Muslim shrines, including the Al-Aksa Mosque and the golden Dome
of the Rock.
Adnan al-Husseini, member of the Council for the Wakf and Islamic
Affairs in Jerusalem, said that construction of the minaret is under
consideration.
"It is a question which is under study right now," al-Husseini said.
"The [Jordanian] King [Abdullah II] has a hope to build this."
A minaret is a tall, thin tower with balconies from which Muslims are
called to prayer several times during the day. There are currently four
of them on the Temple Mount.
Dr. Reif Najim, vice president of the Jordanian Construction Committee,
was quoted in the Jerusalem Post on Wednesday as saying that a minaret
would be built.
But Prime Minister Ariel Sharon's spokesman Dr. Ra'anan Gissin said he
did not know of any formal request from the Jordanians.
"Jordan was responsible for the maintenance of the holy sites on the
Temple Mount since 1967," Gissin said. Any change on the Temple Mount
would be "considered" and "examined" but it's possible that it's "not
the right time" to do so, he said.
"It's a very delicate status quo," Gissin said. The "last thing" anyone
wants is to "ignite" another problem on the Temple Mount, he said.
Dangerous move
Dr. Yitzhak Reiter from the Jerusalem Institute of Israel Studies said
allowing the construction of a minaret or anything on the mount is a
"dangerous" and "irresponsible" move.
"The idea is a little bit dangerous because any change in the character
of the site, digging, building, structural change is a violation of the
status quo," Reiter said.
The "status quo" on the Temple Mount was derived over the years through
a series of unwritten or unofficial understandings between Israel and
Jordan, he said.
Allowing Jordan to build a minaret might encourage extremists - Jewish
or Christian or others - to demand that they, too, be allowed to build
structures on the Temple Mount, Reiter said.
Jordan continued to administer the site even after it came under Israeli
sovereignty as a result of the 1967 Six Day War. But it is in the part
of Jerusalem that Palestinians hope to incorporate into the capital of a
future Palestinian State. Israel says united Jerusalem is its eternal,
indivisible capital.
According to the 1994 Israeli-Jordanian peace agreement, Israel agreed
to respect the "special role" of Jordan at Muslim holy shrines in
Jerusalem and promised to give "high priority" to Jordan's historic role
at the shrines during permanent status negotiations with the
Palestinians.
In an act of defiance, Palestinian Authority Chairman Yasser Arafat, who
agreed not to set up institutions in Jerusalem according to his
agreement with Israel, appointed his own mufti of Jerusalem, Sheikh
Ikrama Sabri, and other Palestinian officials over the Islamic religious
authority on the Temple Mount, sidelining the Jordanian administration
in the mid 1990s.
Nevertheless, a report last month indicated that there were signs that
Jordan was once again asserting its authority over the Temple Mount as a
result of an Israeli policy of pushing the PA out of the city.
But Reiter said there are other ways for Israel to encourage Jordan with
regard to the Temple Mount.
"It's a wrong Israeli interest," Reiter said. "If Israel is interested
in making more room to Jordanian administration on the Haram al-Sharif,
there are other ways to help Jordan get more power there."
Building a minaret there would be a "new initiative" not necessary
according to Islamic tradition, Reiter said. But it does coincide with
the idea of upgrading the status of Jerusalem as a holy site more than
the third holiest site in Islam.
Supervision Needed
Archeologist Dr. Eilat Mazar is concerned about the idea of building on
the Mount for other reasons.
Mazar is member of the non-political, Committee for Preventing the
Destruction of Antiquities on the Temple Mount, which sounded the alarm
about what it considers the wholesale destruction of antiquities on the
Temple Mount.
It is imperative that no construction be performed on the Mount without
proper archeological supervision, Mazar said.
Comparing the Temple Mount's archeological significance to that of the
Egyptian pyramids, she said that in the past the Wakf has used seemingly
reasonable requests to engage in large building projects.
"They're using all kinds of good causes like an emergency exit as an
excuse [for] massive construction without archeological [supervision],"
she said, in reference to a request several years ago.
The Islamic authorities there used the permission to build an "emergency
exit" from an underground area known as Solomon's Stables to carve out
what has been described as the largest mosque in the Middle East under
one corner of Temple Mount.
Archeologists and others were alarmed by the fact that the operation had
no Israeli archeological supervision as required by law and claimed that
tons of fill full of artifacts was carelessly discarded and lost
forever.
"The destruction is irreversible," Mazar said. "[I would] like to know
that there is true archeological supervision taking place."
The Islamic authority on the Mount denied any wrongdoing and said it had
its own archeologists working at the site.
According to Mazar, while the Islamic authorities take care of the
mosques on the Mount they do not exercise the same care over the site
itself.
"We know part of it is about to collapse," Mazar said. "Only the mosques
are treated with preservation activity. The whole compound, we know is
in a very bad state."
|