The Real Jesus

by Garner Ted Armstrong

 

CONTENTS - Whole Book Version

Introduction

Chapter 1   The Birth of Jesus: The Greatest Story Never Told  

Chapter 2   Jesus the Creator--His Former Life  

Chapter 3   Jesus’ Childhood, Education and Early Life

Chapter 4   Jesus and His Family  

Chapter 5   Jesus in Palestine--The Historical Facts  

Chapter 6   What Jesus Looked Like  

Chapter 7   Jesus and John the Baptist: Incongruous?

Chapter 8   Choosing His Disciples  

Chapter 9   Water into Wine  

Chapter 10  Encounter with Satan  

Chapter 11  Jesus’ Faith  

Chapter 12  Miracles and Healings-- Signs of His Messiahship  

Chapter 13  Demons  

Chapter 14  “That which is born of the Spirit is Spirit”

Chapter 15  The Kingdom Parables  

Chapter 16  Confronting the Pharisees and Sadducees  

Chapter 17  Was Jesus a Lawbreaker?

Chapter 18  Satan and Judas--The Mental Perversion  

Chapter 19  The Day the Earth Shook  

Chapter 20  A Step Through Stone 283

 

Introduction:

Meet the Real Jesus

It’s time you met the real Jesus.

It’s time you knew Him as He was: sometimes brusque, abrupt and authoritative. Always thoughtful, philosophical and profound.

It’s time you knew that Jesus could be the kindest and most gentle human being on earth, showing boundless love, mercy and forgiveness to those who genuinely asked for it and were in a repentant spirit. But it is time to recognize that Jesus could also radiate blazing anger and could hurl swift, incisive indictments at all posturing egotists, self-righteous religionists, simpering crowd followers, or even at His own beloved disciples when they got out of line.

It’s time you knew that Jesus perspired just as you do; that He grew desperately hungry and tired; that He almost starved to death on one terrible occasion; that He suffered through the entire panorama of human temptations, passions and emotions which are common to us all; that He enjoyed food and drink; that He appreciated feminine beauty.

It’s time you knew that Christ could cry, shout, laugh and sing; that He could enjoy the rough camaraderie of men of His own age in an out-of-doors camp, or appreciate the glittering setting of fabulous feasts in the most palatial of estates.

It’s time that you realized that Jesus was not a vagabond; that He was a professional builder in the construction business, combining the technology of “modern,” first-century engineering with the art of the skilled craftsman.

It’s time you knew the Jesus who was admired by officers high in the Roman army, who became a puzzle to Pilate, who was hated by the Pharisees, greatly beloved by His disciples, held in awe by the masses, detested by Judas, deeply admired by a proud mother, intensely loved by John, rebuked by Peter, and who was just as intensely human as you are.

Few know that Jesus was not born on or anywhere near December 25;

--that, as a boy, Jesus learned a profession; that He became the senior member in a construction partnership; that He owned at least one and probably two homes of His own; that He paid taxes.

--that Jesus slept indoors most of His life and frequently spent the night in the homes of very wealthy people, including Romans as well as religious opponents.

--that He was a personal friend of con artists, soldiers, fishermen, cheats, liars, thieves, crooked politicians, religious leaders and prostitutes.

--that Jesus did not come to save the world some two thousand years ago, that He has not been trying to save it since, and that He is not trying to save it today.

--that Jesus did not die of a broken heart; that He was not crucified on “Good Friday”; that He was not resurrected on “Easter Sunday”; that neither Jesus nor His disciples ever celebrated (or taught anyone to celebrate) Christmas or Easter.

--that Jesus had to prove to doubting disciples by incontrovertible evidence that He had truly been resurrected.

--that Jesus Christ is alive today, is planning to return to earth and has actually begun His “countdown” from heaven!

If your own values are those of the common person, the real Jesus may insult you, shock you, please you, challenge you, inspire you, surprise you, make you wonder. But He will never bore you.

Chapter 1

The Birth of Jesus:
The Greatest Story
Never Told

Jesus was born sometime in the late summer or early autumn of 4 B.C.

The first time I ever made this statement to anyone I was viewed with a combination of doubt, incredulity, hostility and outright pity.

“How in the world could Jesus have been born before Christ?” I was asked.

It so happens that the present system in the Western Christian-professing world of counting years either prior to or subsequent to the event of our Savior’s birth was not established until the work of Dionysius the Little, many, many centuries this side of the event.

In the events surrounding Jesus’ birth, God managed to move a whole empire by causing the world leader of that time to establish an entirely new government bureau (the taxing and census bureau) which finally resulted in Joseph and Mary ending up in Bethlehem at the time of Jesus’ birth! Part of the requirement of the vast worldwide census-taking was each family returning to the city of its origin (“And all went to be taxed everyone (into) his own city (Luke 2:3-4), so since the Bible claimed Joseph was of the lineage of David (as both genealogical records in Matthew and Luke prove) he had to journey with his wife who was in an advanced state of pregnancy from Nazareth to Bethlehem, which is called the “city of David.” The census in Palestine took place in our faulty chronological reckoning about the year 4 B.C.

From early on, Mary understood that she was pregnant. She knew the meaning of the interruption of the normal menstrual cycle; after all, hadn’t an angel actually told her this would happen?

Though it must have been nearly unbelievable, and there surely must have been moments of doubt, Mary’s training and deep religious education, including the quality of her own character and the deadly seriousness of the impending persecutions and her knowledge of glances of those in her own community, must have all been weighing heavily upon her mind as she contemplated her gradually changing form, slightly swelling belly, and growing breasts.

Even though there probably had been many sessions between husband and wife, poring over those prophecies they knew referred to what was happening within the body of Mary herself, explaining why this shocking transformation in their own private lives had turned their little world upside down, they did not have perfect understanding of many vague references later revealed by the gospel writers, and by Jesus Himself.

Naturally, Joseph and Mary had been living with the pain of growing notoriety ever since friends and relatives learned of Mary’s pregnancy. They were fully prepared to accept it, as Mary’s humble statement, “Behold, the. handmaiden of the Lord,” clearly shows.

Still, it was tough, and they were as human as you and I.

Oh, there were close friends and relatives who knew the truth. After all, Elizabeth and Mary were cousins, and Elizabeth was carrying the baby who would grow up to become John the Baptist—both remembered the remarkable occasion when the two babies had reacted so obviously when the two expectant mothers met. Joseph and Mary could spend time with such people, away from the smirks and knowing stares of the hypocrites.

But suffered when friends talked behind their backs; they hurt when former friends shunned them; they Probably had second, or even third, thoughts about the tremendous burden they had assumed, as would any other normal human beings. But they had the courage to see it through.

It may have seemed a cruel twist of fate, to be required by the Romans to travel all that distance during the final, crucial month of pregnancy. It is clear that Joseph and Mary were not acting out any special predestined fulfillment of prophecy, or they would have seen the predictions that Christ was to be born in Bethlehem, and would have tried to travel earlier, at an easier time, and to have arranged accommodations more suitable than the hasty, last ditch improvisation of a manger.

Neither could they have known that what had appeared to be a terribly difficult trip, at best, would end up with their being exiles in a foreign country, waiting until Herod the Great had died.

Christ was not born on Christmas. Those who do not yet know this, or do not wish to know it, are either too firmly dedicated to tradition, no matter how pagan, or are too lazy to bother with simple research.

Abundant evidence exists which proves Christmas is utterly pagan in origin; as pagan as belief in Dagon, Vishnu, Baal, or Isis and Osiris.

Jesus was born in the autumn, though the exact date is kept carefully concealed. Look at the eyewitness accounts, written by those who were there. Even Herod didn’t know exactly when Christ was born, or he could not have risked a massive uprising by his brutal edict to butcher helpless babies up to two years of age!

Most people have never heard the true facts surrounding Christ’s birth; and lodged in their minds is only a purely mythological tale which exists only in fantasy and erroneous religious tradition.

The traditional view of Jesus’ birth, with the loveliest manger imaginable on the face of the earth; sadly smiling shepherds leaning on their crooks; the Magi, gorgeously arrayed in obviously kingly robes with funny-looking crowns, opening up little gold boxes wherein are contained precious spices; a tiny baby nestled in the arms of mother who stares sadly at him with a halo around her head and a sweet smile curving her mouth; maybe naked little babies flitting through the heavens, and a bright star in the distance outside —all this is repeated endlessly in millions of Christmas cards, religious books, journals and magazines, illustrated pages in Bibles, and on people’s front yards, rooftops, in their driveways, along roadsides, and in displays in churches at Christmastime.

But, the shepherds were not there at the birth. They came later. And there is no reason to suspect that the shepherds and the wise men ever crossed trails.

But let’s ask a few questions concerning Jesus’ birth. How did God manage to convince the lowly and humble classes that in fact a Savior was this day being born?

He did so by the most intricate collection of divine miracles, carefully interwoven into the fabric of history, extending so far back in time that it boggles the mind.

Few realize that Michael the archangel spoke to Daniel and delivered to him the longest single prophecy in the Bible (Daniel, the 11th chapter is personal testimony from the archangel Michael) informing him of a great struggle going on among arch demons, and perhaps Satan himself.

These were influencing the mind of the “Prince of Persia” in order to bring about some disruption in Gods’ plan to cause Artaxerxes to allow the Jewish captives under Ezra to return to their homeland and reestablish the religious state.

Though it deserves a great deal of space, the miracles having to do with the precise moment of Jesus’ birth, the decree of Augustus, the building of the temple, the beginning of His ministry, the decrees of Cyrus and Artaxerxes, and many other related events are tightly interwoven into a careful system of intricately fulfilled prophecies to form a network of incontrovertible evidence: the fact that Jesus Christ of Nazareth was in truth the Son of God.

All the religious leaders knew, and the common folk believed intensely in, Isaiah’s prophecy, “Behold, a virgin shall conceive, and bear a son, and shall call his name Immanuel” (which means “God with us” in Isa. 7:14). They knew Isaiah had said, “The people that walked in darkness have seen a great light: they that dwell in the land of the shadow of death, upon them hath the light shined…for unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given: and the government shall be upon his shoulder: and his name shall be called Wonderful Counselor [Wonder of a Counselor], the Mighty God, the Everlasting Father, the Prince of Peace.

“Of the increase of His government and peace there shall be no end, upon the throne of David, and upon his kingdom, to order it, and to establish it with judgment and with justice from henceforth even for ever. The zeal of the Lord of Hosts will perform this” (Isa. 9:2-7).

But how would God manage to avoid the contemptuous slander of “impostor” heaped upon Jesus not only by His detractors, persecutors and religious antagonists, but even by His own closest disciples and personal friends? How would the common people, the meek, lowly shepherd and laboring class be convinced utterly that Jesus was in fact fulfilling the many prophecies of Isaiah, Daniel and others and was in fact the promised Messiah, that “Prophet” who should come to deliver Israel, and to qualify to inherit the throne of David?

First, God sent a humble group of shepherds from sufficiently far away that no one could claim collusion.

An angel appeared to them and said, “Unto you is born this day in the city of David a Savior which is Christ the Lord” (Luke 2: 11). They were not. given any address, only a sign that they would find the baby wrapped in swaddling clothes, lying in a manger; meaning He would be so newly born that there would have been no opportunity for either the purchase or the making of clothes for Him, and He would still be wrapped in a soft blanket, not yet moved inside an inn or a private home, but lying in a bed of straw.

Obviously, then, the shepherds in journeying around the streets and the marketplaces of Bethlehem were asking from time to time where they could find a baby who had been born in a manger.

They were no doubt quite excited about the vision they had seen, and it is inconceivable that they were not elated with that combination of awe, fright, and yet subdued joy over having actually heard the voice of an angel, and seeing an overwhelmingly bright light seemingly coming very near to them out of the heavens. Thus they fully expected to find the Savior of mankind lying in swaddling clothes in a manger. They probably asked any number of people, and repeated time and again to the excited questions they were asked precisely what had happened.

Finally, with the question having been asked sufficiently about the town, perhaps one servant at a nearby inn recalled that Joseph or a friend had come, urgently begging the use of some basins and some heated water; that one of the females in the kitchen had rushed off to help during the birth; and that several of the women, had been exclaiming about the fact that a poor woman had to be turned out in such an advanced state of pregnancy, when a lot of other people had been put up in more suitable accommodations, and were clicking their tongues about the unfortunate happenstance that the poor lady had given birth in a stable.

Actually, the Creator was succeeding in announcing the birth through three separate groups of individuals: the shepherds themselves; all the citizenry and the townsfolk they asked and who subsequently became involved, and Joseph and his own family.

The events of the first few weeks after Jesus’ birth caused widespread attention. It is evident that the Idumaean Herod (he was only partly Jewish) was terribly shaken by what he had heard.

The Bible says he was troubled and all Jerusalem with him (Matt. 2:3), and claims he gathered all the chief priests (who probably were Sadducees) and scribes of the people together and demanded of them where the Christ should be born (Matt. 2:4). All of the scholars were aware that this very likely was the time of the birth of Christ.

Pious frauds and sincere scholars—astronomers, astrologers, seers and soothsayers alike—were almost universally expectant that some great event would occur at about this time, and were looking for the Messiah.

When Herod called together the “chief priests and scribes of the people,” this was tantamount to the President of the United States having a combined cabinet and Supreme Court meeting.

The “‘Supreme Court” of the Jewish nation was the Sanhedrin, and the greatest religious body of the nation declared in unanimity that Jesus the Savior would be born in Bethlehem, a city of David!

There is no evidence whatever of the length of time that elapsed from the moment the “star” (an angel, as shown by scriptures) appeared to the Magi in “the east” (most authorities believe Persia) until their arrival in Jerusalem; it could have been several weeks, or even months.

Following their interview with Herod, and his request that they “search out carefully concerning the young child,” they went outside, saw the “star” again, and followed it until “it came and stood over where the young child was” (Matt. 2:9). This was in Bethlehem, a short distance over steeply plunging trails from Jerusalem. Contrary to the assumption of millions, Jesus and His parents had found more permanent accommodations following the hasty emergency quarters in the stable, and the Magi “came into the house, and saw the young child with Mary His mother, and they fell down and worshipped Him . . .” (Matt. 2: 11).

That night, the wise men had a “bad dream,” a warning from God, and sneaked out of the country without going back into Jerusalem. After they left, Joseph also had a dream. “Now when they were departed, behold an angel of the Lord appeared to Joseph in a dream, saying, Arise and take the young child and His mother, and flee into Egypt, and stay there until I tell you; for Herod will seek the young child to destroy him.”

Joseph got up, hustled Mary and the baby, and any other servants or family members who might have been with them, into their clothes, packed and loaded the animals and took off that same night, hitting the caravan route to Egypt, probably swinging further into Arabia. They probably stopped at little-known campsites, avoiding the usual water holes and towns or villages along the way. Little did Joseph know that inadvertently he was fulfilling another prophecy which said, “Out of Egypt did I call my son” (Hosea 11:1).

Herod waited a few days, and then, in a fit of insane rage, “sent forth, and slew all the male children that were in Bethlehem, and in all the borders thereof, from two years old and under, according to the time which he had carefully learned of the wise men” (Matt. 2:16).

Since it was the major trade and commercial capital, Joseph probably had business, interests in Jerusalem. His own building trade required that he deal from time to time with importers, distributors and craftsmen who were located there. So he and his family may have remained in Jerusalem up to about one year following Jesus’ birth, though there is no actual proof. However, the murder of the children by Herod, risky even for a despotic king, offers some proof that Herod suspected the child would have been about one year of age, or even slightly older.

After Joseph and family had been somewhere in Egypt for a time, another dream occurred; an angel said to Joseph, “Get up and take the young child with his mother, and go into Israel: for they are dead that sought the young child’s life” (Matt. 2:19-23).

The following verse indicates Joseph’s first choice as a place to live probably would have been Jerusalem or its environs. “But when he heard that Archelaus was reigning over Judea in the room of his father Herod, he was afraid to go thither; and being warned of God in a dream, he withdrew into the parts of Galilee, and came and dwelt in a city called Nazareth; that it might be fulfilled which was spoken by the prophets, that He should be called a Nazarene.”

Being a “Nazarene” merely meant He was a citizen of the city of Nazareth. He is called “Jesus Christ of Nazareth” several times in the Bible. Jesus was not an un-common name (only the Greek form of Joshua); no doubt there was any number of individuals bearing the same name; it was quite common to name children after various attributes of God, or to include names of God (the prefix El and the suffix “Yah” were very commonly applied) in a person’s name. The real Jesus was a Nazarene in the same sense a citizen of Chicago is a “Chicagoan,” or someone living in Los Angeles is an “Angelino,” or those in Paris are “Parisians.” It was not a “religious” title of any sort, but a geographical and political term.

From the time of the young lad’s return with His parents from Egypt, to the city of Nazareth, there is no further mention of Jesus until the moment He is seen sitting in the temple, both listening to questions and asking His own questions of the most learned doctors of the law, and astonishing them with His understanding and His answers (Luke 2:46-52).

Chapter 2

Jesus the Creator—
His Former Life

In later years, Jesus was always making some “outrageous” statement, the way the Pharisees looked at it. If something was true, He said it. If something was false, He called it so. For example, Jesus once said, “Your father Abraham rejoiced to see my day: and he saw it, and was glad.” What Jesus meant by this was that He, Jesus, in His divine form was the very person who physically (through spiritual transformation) had visited Abraham (Genesis 18) and had related to him the reality of the coming of God’s Kingdom; that Abraham, because he had proved obedient and faithful, would have a part in that Kingdom; that Abraham had known of the necessity of a Savior to come (“rejoiced to see my day”) and had been glad.

The religious leaders didn’t get it. Jesus was thinking in “another dimension”—the full knowledge and awareness of who He was, of what He was, of His spiritual background and timelessness, His great mission on earth, and His need to continually preach that great truth.

The religious leaders answered Him by a sarcastic, “You are not fifty years old, and have you seen Abraham?” implying He was crazy. Jesus then made another of those “outrageously” strange statements. “Verily, verily, I say upon you, Before Abraham was, I am”!

When Moses wanted to know what to say to the Israelites upon returning to Egypt on his mission of leading them in the Exodus, he asked God, “When I come upon the children of Israel, and shall say unto them, The God of your fathers hath sent me unto you; and they say to me, What is his name: What shall I say unto them? And God said unto Moses, I AM THAT I AM: And he said, Thus shalt thou say unto the children of Israel, I Am hath sent me unto you” (Exodus 3:13-14).

“I am that I am” can also be taken to mean “I will be what I will be” or “I continue to be that which I continue to be.” “I am the self-determined one, the life self-inherent, the one who is, and who always will be: the Eternal.” (God is also called the “Amen,” meaning, the “So be it” or “So it shall be.”)

The Pharisees were familiar with Exodus 3:14, you can be sure. Thus, when Jesus plainly said He was that one who had said those words to Abraham, it just about snapped their minds. Forgetting all legality, propriety, or due process, they flew into a blind rage, and “. . . took up stones to cast at him: but Jesus hid himself, and went out of the temple, going through the midst of them, and so passed by” (John 8:56-59).

There are two other important scriptures relative to Christ’s preexistence.

In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth.” (Genesis 1:1)

In the beginning was the Word and the Word was with God and the Word was God.” (John 1: 1)

In Genesis 1:1, the Hebrew word for God is Elohim. It is an interesting word with a plural form (the im ending.) A little research demonstrates that Elohim can indicate more than one person; and can be taken to mean a family of persons.

Through many portions of the Bible, Jesus reveals a family relationship in both the family of God and the family of man. While Jesus is called the Son of God, He is also called the Son of man, the Creator and Author of human life, the first-begotten from all humankind, the “firstborn among many brethren” (Rom. 8:29), the Captain and Author of our salvation, and the soon-coming King of Kings and Lord of Lords.

Notice that there is duality everywhere evidenced, not only in God’s creation, but throughout the Bible when members of the Godhead are revealed.

Elohim means more than one, and while not necessarily limiting the number, many other texts prove there were the Father (who no man has ever seen at any time) and the Son.

Therefore, in our modern English language, the beginning text of the Bible would be more understandable if it were written thus: “In the beginning the family of God, consisting of the Father and the Son, created the heaven and the earth!’

John 1: 1 is the second significant place in the Bible where the phrase “In the beginning . . .” is used.

In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. The same was in the beginning with God. All things were made by him; and without him was not anything made that was made” (John 1: 1-3).

Here, the Greek word, logos (word) is used in reference to Christ. None of the other disciples who wrote of Jesus’ life (Matthew, Mark and Luke) utilized “logos” in reference to Christ.

The Greek word seems to have a double meaning, referring to both “reason” and “speech.” However, the idea John obviously had in mind is to convey the clearest meaning of those many long talks he and Jesus had privately, wherein Jesus conveyed to him the deepest secrets and mysteries of Jesus’ own preexistent state.

You have the feeling, in reading the first chapter of John that John is speaking from a great deal of experience, trying to recall words which Jesus Himself very likely used.

John’s first chapter closely corroborates the fact that the Hebrew word Elohim in Genesis 1: 1 means that there was more, than one member of the God family involved in the creating!

The “Word” was, then, the executive member of the Godhead, One of whom the Bible says “all things were made by him”!

Perhaps the clearest scripture absolutely proving that the Jesus Christ of the New Testament was the same Being who was the Eternal Creator of the Old Testament, the God of Abraham, Isaac and Israel, is Colossians 1: 16: “For by him were all things created, that are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether they be thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things were created by him, and for him.”

These verses very plainly show that this same Being who made all things, “was in the world and the world was made by him, and the world knew him not. He came unto his own, and his own received him not. But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name: which were born [begotten] not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God.” (John 1: 10-13)

This unmistakable reference to Jesus Christ of Nazareth clearly shows, without any interpretation or exegesis, that the creator being who is called “God” (Elohim or YHWH) in the Old Testament is the same individual who became the Jesus Christ of the New Testament!

Notice the next words, “And the Word became flesh, and dwelt among us (and we beheld his glory, glory as of the only begotten of the Father), full of grace and truth” (John 1:14).

The Word did the creating, and the Word “became flesh.” What could be simpler than that?

The New Testament is rife with scriptures concerning Jesus’ attempts to convey the message which the Father gave Him. He said He spoke only as the Father inspired Him, spoke only what the Father gave Him. Jesus continually said He came to reveal the Father: He prayed to His Father, said He was returning to His Father, and showed, continually, a Father-Son relationship

There is a great deal of further proof throughout the Bible on the pre-human origins of Jesus Christ! For example, He is called that “Rock” which followed the children of Israel in the wilderness (“And did all drink the same spiritual drink: for they drank of that spiritual Rock that followed them: and that Rock was Christ” 1 Cor. 10:4); and is referred to as that “Rock” in Deuteronomy: “He is the Rock, his work is perfect” (Deut. 32:4).

The personage who “emptied himself” and “became of no repute,” and “was made flesh,” born of the virgin Mary to become the baby Jesus in Bethlehem, was the same individual who created Adam, who saved Noah, who appeared to Abraham, who wrestled in the dust of the earth with Jacob, who called and spoke to Moses out of a fiery bush and a cloud, who parted the Red Sea and who spoke directly to His prophets, from the patriarchs prior to the flood on down to Elijah and others. Jesus Christ of Nazareth was the same personality of the Godhead or God family who wrote with His own finger the Ten Commandments and who ruled Israel.

The Bible absolutely proves the fact that Jesus Christ of the New Testament is the same person as the God of the Old Testament!

Chapter 3

Jesus’ Childhood,
Education and Early Life

Despite the fact that the Bible gives us only the briefest view through a keyhole, as it were, into the events of Jesus’ birth, and gives us only one sentence, that of Luke 2:40, about His boyhood, most theologians tend to portray Jesus in only two major moments of His life; that of His birth, as celebrated by the pagan adaptation of an Egyptian, Greek, Roman, Nordic and Druidic ceremony called “Christmas,” or an equally pagan ceremony surrounding His death and Resurrection, which came out of ancient Babylon, Egypt, Rome and Greece, called Ishtar anciently, or “Easter” today.

However, God no doubt knew exactly what He was doing when He preserved only a few brief statements about Jesus’ birth, and then spent more than 90 percent of the remainder of biblical texts concerning Christ’s message—His life from age 30 onward, His ministry, His miracles, and His death, burial and resurrection!

So what was Jesus like when He was a small child? Did Mary ever have to spank Jesus? Was He a “normal” child in every way? Was there no necessity to train Him; to teach Him in. the simplest ways as every parent should?

To find out, first let’s consider His earthly parents.

They were, together with Mary’s cousin Elizabeth (John the Baptist’s mother), Zacharias, and a small minority of others, living a sincerely righteous life within the intent of God’s laws. That meant they were physically healthy; following God’s revealed laws about foods, exercise, diet, avoidance of the use of harmful substances, like drugs, and of overindulgence, or any excesses. Mary was in perfect health. Remember, too, that the tiny fetus being shaped in her womb was guarded, each moment, not only by God’s Holy Spirit, but by unseen angelic beings! Michael and Gabriel were both extremely busy at this time—you can be sure that God the Father in heaven had commissioned His most powerful obedient spirit beings to keep close guardianship over that precious human life.

Mary would have had a “normal” pregnancy. There would have been no abuses heaped upon that tiny, growing baby within her by a thoughtless mother who deprived the baby of its needed nourishments. No smoking, no excessive use of stimulants or depressants, no careless accidents which could cause injury, no violent, emotional upsets, or a loud, screaming, unhealthy family environment.

That she was in excellent health is obvious from the fact that even in an advanced state of pregnancy, she made the trip from Nazareth to Bethlehem. Probably she could have ridden in a cart, or similar conveyance pulled by donkey or horse, or even have ridden a donkey or a horse itself.

The presence of God’s Spirit, and angels, together with the physical condition of Mary and her absolute obedience to health laws enables you to know that Jesus was a perfectly shaped and formed, healthy baby.

. Now let’s consider Jesus Himself. Did Jesus ever cry? Why do babies cry? Too many mothers don’t know they sometimes cry because of a need for exercise; sometimes cry almost automatically from various stimuli on some occasions; as well as cry because they are hungry, or tired, or wet and uncomfortable.

Yes, Jesus cried. If He could weep at Lazarus’s tomb because of the obstinate faithlessness of people, He could have cried as a baby because He was in need of a good workout, waving little arms and legs about, and filling His lungs.

But though He could cry when hungry, wet, or uncomfortable (there is no sin in crying and responding to the natural human emotions of infancy), Jesus was a completely different baby boy.

Every normal baby reaches that point in his infancy where his cries and wails of outrage take on a new tone of self-pity, anger, resentment or frustration.

The Bible reveals that the carnal mind (the natural human mind with the spirit in man but without God’s Holy Spirit) is enmity against God (Romans 8:7)! Millions do not know why they resent God’s law, His way of life, and any directives from God in their private lives! Jeremiah 17:9 reveals that the human heart is deceitful and desperately wicked and asks “who can know it?”

As “normal children” we all grew up in our own environments, to become gradually acquainted with all the feelings of racism, group instincts, competition, selfishness, pride, self-pity, vanity, and self-consciousness which made up the whole panorama of our earliest years, with all the “normal” frustrations, introversions, embarrassment, dashed hopes, successes, or despair.

How far back can you remember? Can you remember when you were three or four or five?

Chances are, you have only the dimmest or vaguest awareness of those early years of your life, but those recollections which do stand out are the ones that had to do with either major triumphs, such as successes in games, in some experience among children your own age or with your parents; or in deep disappointments or frustrations, such as playground altercations, being pushed and shoved by the neighborhood bully, or in having an intense “boy-girl relationship” with a neighborhood child, beginning sex experimentation; or in a host of other experiences which are common to human nature.

Though it’s difficult for you to accept it or believe it, Jesus Christ experienced none of these!

From His beginning awareness of learning of words, that little baby, in whose little mind was the “Spirit of God without limit” could learn without the normal hostility and antagonism toward authority symbols, such as His parents or others around Him.

I can imagine how many times Mary must have told Jesus, “You are different, Jesus, You are the Son of God! You were not born in the same way all other little boys and girls are born—but by a divine miracle! You are a little Prince, born to become the King of Israel, and to be the Messiah sent to Israel and to all mankind.”

I cannot imagine a human individual going through the fabulous series of remarkable miracles as did Mary who would not have continually sung that baby to sleep by rocking Him in her arms, constantly thrilled and aware of His divine origins and the great calling which awaited Him.

I can well imagine she must have made up songs of her own, or even hummed some of the psalms about deliverance; that she would have taught Him continually about every one of the miracles, visions, dreams, miraculous appearances of angels, and the events prior to and surrounding His birth and young babyhood.

As Jesus grew older, His direct contact with the Father, through the power of God’s Holy Spirit, His deepening and growing awareness of the “other dimension” of the always present spirit world (angels were about Him from the time of His conception throughout His life) meant that His learning process was not twisted by feelings that are common to the carnal mind.

If Mary could describe the reactions of her different children (she had at least seven of them), she would no doubt have testified that Jesus was her “best baby.”

Ever hear of a “child prodigy”? Jesus was a child prodigy—but not in the traditional sense. Jesus was a prodigy, if that is the right word, in wisdom and understanding. He could perceive the profound meaning and implication of God’s Holy Scripture; He could answer questions about the Bible that generations of scholars had argued over. He could expound and explain the Bible with far greater perception and power than anyone else had ever done. Jesus knew the Scriptures very well, but He probably didn’t have a perfect photographic memory. He had to work to learn the Bible; He had to study hard with great diligence and dedication. But when the time came to preach what He had learned, suddenly Jesus burst forth with startling insight, brilliant analysis and profound impact.

If He could astound the learned doctors of the law at age 12, He could have already startled His fellow classmates in His classes as well as His mother and father!

Jesus had God’s Holy Spirit “without measure.” A converted person today, who has repented, been baptized, and received God’s Spirit is still mostly carnal. He is said to have received a little “earnest” or “down payment” of God’s Spirit, but, even as Paul told the church members of Corinth, is “yet carnal.” The Holy Spirit is there, in the mind, but in a comparatively small amount, and as Paul explained, helps us resist the carnal pulls, but however sometimes loses. (Paul said, “The thing that I hate, I do, and that which I would do, I cannot seem to do.”)

Not so with Christ, even as a tiny child. There was no carnal reaction. There was the temptation to react carnally, in exact measure to the level of understanding of His mind, depending on the age. But there was the help of the limitless power of God’s Spirit, plus the protection of angels to help Him overcome such temptations.

Did Jesus suffer any of the “childhood diseases”? Unthinkable! Not only is there not the faintest whisper of evidence to indicate Jesus was ever “sick” a single day of His life, but there is every evidence to the contrary! In following the divinely revealed laws of God basic to good, physical health, Jesus’ bodily resistance to any disease was especially high. There are laws involving human diet revealed in the Bible which have to do with the physical health and well-being of us humans which can only be known through revelation, and could perhaps never be known through the modern biochemical analyses of chemistry and nutrition. Consequently, Jesus’ parents would have seen to it that He received the very finest diet available according to their means!

This meant that Jesus was eating whole grain foods, drinking raw milk from domestic cattle and goats (anyone can tell you that goat’s milk, so long as the creature is fed a reasonably good diet, is much richer than cow’s milk), and was eating lamb, mutton, beef, fish, fowl, and the common diet of a basically agrarian society where food was never “processed” in the sense that we know it today, where it was seasonal, natural, and healthful. Further, He had the protection of God’s Holy Spirit throughout His life, and though there is no mention of it, if Jesus had ever ingested spoiled food, tainted meat, or anything of any nature that could have brought about physical debility or sickness, there is no doubt whatever that a divine miracle was instantly imposed, and that Christ was protected from any ill effects. (Jesus later predicted that His own disciples, in the conduct of their work in fulfilling the great commission He gave them, would not be affected by poisonous things, whether they picked them up accidentally as in the case of the Apostle Paul, who was bitten on the hand by a poisonous serpent while preparing a fire on an island, or whether they happened to ingest tainted, poisonous drink or other things dangerous to health!)

From His earliest babyhood then, Jesus followed the laws of physical health. He ate right foods, got plenty of the, right kind of strenuous exercise, a good full night’s sleep every single night, and “grew and waxed strong” as a result!

What kind of games did He play? Did Jesus ever indulge in loud noises and fits of screaming, or throw tantrums as a tiny child? Was He ever given to outbursts of anger?

His play periods were different from those of most normal children of today, in that there were never any games of pretense, of sham, which required lying, “pretending” to be someone He was not, “hero worship” in the form of the “cops and robbers,” “cowboys and Indians,” played by so many millions of children today! (Or “Romans and Jews” or “Maccabees and Romans” back then.)

There were no feelings of self-importance, because there was no vanity!

If you took away vanity and a desire for attention, all the frustrations which bring about the psychoses, neuroses, mental handicaps and debilities which shape most of the rest of us, you would see a different picture indeed!

Whether it was a simple game of marbles or the other games Jesus might have played, you would never have seen a temper tantrum, a sudden burst of crying and fleeing home, the loud insistence at being number one, the playground altercations, the taunts at other children to make them feel inferior over a handicap, or any of what we call “normal behavior” in most children!

What kind of games did Jesus play? In the first place, perhaps the word “play” could never properly be applied to activities which occupied Jesus’ time between His lessons, studies, learning Joseph’s trade, and the other essentials of life such as eating, sleeping and working. If there was any “play,” it was no doubt the kind of play that was totally constructive!

This means that Jesus, in applying the laws of God perfectly in His life and mind, would never have attempted to take advantage of someone else’s weakness! If there were any games He played, they could not have been games constructed around petty vanities of human ego which make it all essential for the individual to win, no matter by what means! Jesus might have played “games” of the kind which could stimulate thought, help develop a vocabulary, develop physical skills, or perhaps even have contests to see who could finish some constructive project more quickly.

Jesus would have learned self-discipline and the development of physical skills by leaping, climbing, racing, swimming, possibly playing team games (such as our softball, basketball, soccer, water polo, etc.), which were inventions of the time. But as a boy He would never have gone beyond mere contests of physical strength which would not inflict either pain or injury on the other person.

Jesus most surely would have participated in all those rough-and-ready boyhood sporting endeavors which would build strong young bodies and give healthy outlet to youthful energies, but without the feelings of selfish competition.

That meant Jesus would surely have been involved in foot races, in tests of strength in regard to lifting, pulling, tugging, and other physical contests, including wrestling.

Wrestling has been a popular sport for millennia. It puts full focus on the character of the wrestlers as well as on their natural strength and technique. Wrestling, as a sport, without desire to injure or hurt the opponent, builds strength, develops perseverance, generates mental as well as physical endurance and instills personal confidence. We can be quite positive that Jesus wrestled as a boy. How? He had previously shown His interest! We can prove that Jesus, in His preexistent state, had wrestled with Jacob. This remarkable account in Genesis 32:24-30 shows how God developed the character of Jacob by wrestling with him for many hours.

There is no reason to assume the Bible requires that Jesus never once suffered minor nicks, cuts, bruises or abrasions. The Bible does explicitly point out that God had intended only that not one bone of His body should ever be broken, but there was no such restriction placed on the possibility of cuts or abrasions.

It would be doubtful, however, because of Jesus’ careful attention to God’s laws and also common sense about safety on the job and principles of fairness in all sports, that Jesus ever suffered any affliction or injury beyond a very minor nick to a knee or a finger.

Even in these cases, He could quickly look up to God His Father in heaven and ask that God heal the wound, and God could have answered instantly.

With His “other dimensional consciousness” of God’s Holy Spirit, Jesus totally rejected the group instincts. He never allowed Himself to become a member of a “gang.” As a boy, He never limited His association to a certain clique—a select few who could find camaraderie in performing acts of vandalism, playing practical jokes on the elderly, beating up a member of a rival gang, stealing a farmer’s crop, telling giggly tales of sex exploitation, or engaging in wild escapades during some political or religious holiday, as do children of our time.

Jesus knew that God was no respecter of persons, and followed that principle perfectly.

He thoroughly knew the proverb that said, “Don’t let thine heart envy sinners, but be thou in the fear of the Lord all the day long” (Prov. 23:17). And, therefore, the excited tales of other neighborhood boys who would laugh privately about illegal or shameful exploits would not have been attractive to Him.

But Jesus did live through all of those 30 years prior to the beginning of His ministry. No doubt every single day and every single week of those years were jam-packed with living life in the most zestful, enthusiastic, and purposeful manner that has ever been known.

As the years went by, and Jesus’ perceptions grew of exactly what He was to do, who He was and what His calling was, what lay ahead of Him only a few years hence, and the deadly seriousness of the great task before Him, there is no doubt He studied, thought, prayed, pondered and struggled with various thought processes in a way none of us can understand!

Concerning the matter of Jesus’ education, this no doubt consisted of a manifold program, which was superior to the kind of education available to the average youth in our affluent societies of today.

Though the endless fables, oft repeated, were extant in Jesus’ day—including many exploits of the “gods”; common polytheistic theological fantasies told and retold by the Greeks; fabled stories of Nimrod the hunter from Babylon and of the Pharaohs of old from Egypt; and even imaginative additions and trappings to the biblical accounts of Moses and the burning bush, the Noachian deluge, Samson and his strength, David and Goliath, and Saul and the witch of Endor—Jesus never believed them, and never wasted His time on them; nor did He grow up believing in fairies or childhood fairy tales. His education was in the home, in His father’s trade and business, and was the most valuable kind available!

No other teaching methods can surpass private tutelage.

Families such as Joseph’s would have been sufficiently prosperous to have hired a highly skilled private tutor, or even several, whose occupations consisted of teaching in homes in the region.

Remember, Jesus grew up in an area which was a virtual crossroads for trade and commerce, and where the worlds of Europe and Asia met. The area was at least bilingual, and many people grew up learning to speak three languages. There is every evidence Jesus spoke Greek as well as fluent Aramaic, and the Bible also indicates He spoke Hebrew.

How did He learn these languages? The community was mainly bilingual, and parents spoke two languages or more in their own homes. There were no doubt skilled linguists who came into Jesus’ home and taught Him languages on a regular basis.

In addition to languages, the growing young boy would have been taught music, history, geography, the science of the time, and would have been especially learning the skills required in His father’s building profession, which included physics, engineering, mathematics, trigonometry, and the many other disciplines required in the construction of either larger commercial buildings or private homes.

These skills would have included a sense of proportion, symmetry, beauty, harmonies of color, and adaptation to scale. Anyone who was so versatile so as to be involved not only in a choice of location, site preparation and the heavier process of laying of foundations and supporting structures, but even in the finishing of the interior, including the delicate mosaics and decorative features of such a home, would be considered far more flexible than are most people in similar trades today!

It is obvious Jesus would have known about art, literature, music, stone working and building skills, and history. Especially He knew about the Holy Scriptures from start to finish!

But this knowledge was not automatically inserted into His mind through divine fiat, but gradually accumulated as He developed and grew.

The Bible plainly says, “Though he were a Son, yet learned he obedience by the things which he suffered; and being made perfect, he became the author of eternal salvation unto all them that obey him” (Heb. 5:8-9). Learning is a process. So is perfection. Living perfectly for one day does not mean that an individual is “perfect,” for there is much to learn on the next day. Perfection is not only a process of the guarding of perfect character and morality, but also a process of acquisition of additional knowledge, and experience, which together can provide even greater understanding and wisdom.

Because Jesus “experienced” human life in this flesh, He is able to turn to God the Father as an experienced counselor and adviser and explain on some occasions when a human’s failings have been particularly obnoxious and say to His Father, “Father, I understand—please forgive that person!”

God’s Word says Jesus learned “by the things which He suffered,” meaning that many object lessons were learned throughout His young and developing years through that continual awareness, however painful and disillusioning it may have been, of the hypocrisies, the hates and jealousies, vanity, carnality and ego which could afflict members even of His own family and close friends.

Though the Bible calls Him a “man of sorrows and acquainted with grief,” this cannot possibly preclude the fact that Jesus was a completely well-rounded personality who could lay His head back and roar with laughter over something particularly funny; nor did it preclude Jesus indulging in singing lilting songs on occasion; it is likely that He was acquainted not only with the religious songs of that time, but also knew of the folk music of several cultures. Could the very personality of the God Family who invented within us human beings that “universal language” of a deep appreciation for, and a desire to participate in, music have not enjoyed singing? (The only insight that you can gain into Jesus’ musical knowledge was the fact of His deep desire to sing “one more song” with His disciples following the “Lord’s supper” on that final Passover.)

Joseph, while not well-to-do, would have comfortably and adequately provided for his family. That included the ability to pay for special Levitical teachers whose sole responsibilities were either in the priestly or educational line, to come into his home as private tutors on any number of days each week and to teach Jesus special skills in musical instruments, and in the musical literature of the day.

Thus it was that Jesus grew up not only being at least trilingual within the family, but also studying languages through those especially skilled in such, and learning at the feet of brilliant teachers who no doubt very quickly responded to the incredible aptitudes and insatiable thirst for knowledge the young lad possessed.

Did Jesus know the principles of nuclear fission? Was His mind so brilliant in that first century that He knew all there was to know about today’s computers, satellites, business machines, jet aircraft, missiles, and all assorted space-age technology?

Of course not! Although through His awareness of material substances and the physical forces working upon them, Jesus’ grasp of the basic underpinnings of historical and dynamic geology, paleontology, zoology, biology, history, and other related subjects, would have been far superior to those of His time, His growing awareness of His own origins and recollections of the fact that “before Abraham was, I am” would have given him a brilliant and incisive perception of geology and the actual formation and substance of the earth far beyond the most skillful of teachers of His time. But it was not necessary for Jesus’ mind to acquire knowledge far beyond that which was not commonly available to the most learned and best-educated person.

Jesus was not a “space-age” person in a first-century environment; but He most assuredly was a visitor from outer space, and had knowledge surpassing those of His first-century environment by a great measure!

Here was a young lad who, from the time He was six or seven, was cheerfully going about His daily household chores, looking over His father’s shoulder as He watched him work and listening wonderingly as He learned of all of the detailed things he was doing, going happily to His studies to learn to sing, perhaps to play on an instrument or two, to study the languages of His time, and to learn so many interesting and absorbing subjects that His mind was constantly busy. He had no time for the wasteful activities of most youth.

As soon as He was physically able, I am sure Joseph allowed Jesus tasks which would have developed His young body to make it “strong” as Luke reports. He could have been carrying stones, boards and lumber, mortar or plaster, and running errands, fetching tools, climbing up and down ladders, pushing, pulling. lifting, moving, sliding, and continually exercising until, at the end of a long day, He was ready for a good solid meal prepared by a wonderful cook and housekeeper, and to be tucked into bed following a session of prayer with the family, and no doubt some pretty serious private prayer of His own!

Luke shows how Jesus’ parents went to Jerusalem every year at the Feast of the Passover. “And when he was twelve years old, they went up after the custom of the feast . . .” (Luke 2:42). As a boy of 12, He was very wise, and very well educated.

It is no accident that the Bible singles out Jesus’ twelfth year as an important milestone in his life. Without my becoming overly laborious on the matter, suffice it to say that man is not the inventor of numbers, God is. The Bible is very clear on the fact that certain numbers bear certain significance. The number 12 represents “organized beginnings,” or a perfect governmental number.

Further, 12 was the age when, according to Jewish custom, a young boy was expected to pass into the adult community. He began to assume more of the responsibilities of a young man of the household and the family’s trade, and was looked upon as having crossed an important threshold at age 12.

Notice the account of Jesus’ “debut” in the public eye from the time of His private boyhood until the time when He was about 121/2 at the Passover in Jerusalem! “And when he was twelve years old, they went up to Jerusalem after the custom of the feast; and when they had fulfilled the days, as they were returning, the boy Jesus tarried behind in Jerusalem; and his parents knew it not, but supposing him to be in the company, they went a day’s journey; and they sought for him among their kinsfolk and acquaintance: and when they found him not, they returned to Jerusalem, seeking for him” (Luke 2:42-45).

That statement tells you a great deal about the family structure. First of all, the very fact that Jesus’ parents did not realize that Jesus had remained behind in Jerusalem for a full day indicates that Jesus was very mature for His age, well accustomed to handling responsibilities by Himself, and had the total confidence of His parents. Furthermore, by this time the other boys or perhaps both of the girls had been born. Twelve long years had gone by, and Jesus’ brothers and sisters were no doubt along on this journey. Though Jesus was the only one, as the eldest, who had now (some six months earlier) grown into his more adult responsibilities, his other brothers, James, Joses, Simon and Juda, and either one or two girls or even more were probably along. That’s why the Bible talks about “the company,” and how “they sought for him among their kinsfolk” and acquaintances.

Joseph and Mary probably searched through parts of the city where they fully expected to discover Jesus, probably among some of Joseph’s associates and fellow tradesmen, suppliers or business acquaintances.

So it was with a great degree of surprise that they finally found him in the temple.

“And all that heard him were amazed at his understanding and his answers. And when they [Joseph and Mary and His family] saw him, they were astonished, and his mother said unto him, ‘Son, why have you treated us so? Behold, your father and I have been looking for you anxiously! And he said to them, ‘How is it that you sought me? Did you not know that I must be in my Father’s house [temple courts]?’ And they did not understand the saying which be spoke to them” (Luke 2:47-50, RSV).

Now that’s interesting. Jesus’ parents did not understand the meaning of what Jesus had done or said. This demonstrates that heretofore Jesus was not a totally out of-the-ordinary child. He did not constantly tell everyone “who He was,” not even His parents. Though they surely remembered the unusual nature of His birth, the passage of time and the normal ebb and flow of the mundane events of daily life dulled Joseph and Mary’s realization of what Jesus was going to do. Jesus did not flaunt this pre-existent life or the mission of this physical life, even as this realization must have come fully into His consciousness. No doubt by the time of this incident at age 12, Jesus knew who He was and what He had to do. Nonetheless, He maintained His “normal” life as a fine, bright, obedient, young Jewish boy growing up under His parents care.

Jesus was a Jew.

As such, He knew a great deal of persecution throughout His life—for it wasn’t easy growing up in an area of mixed races in His own homeland, including the dark and swarthy Canaanites, Syrophoenicians, Greeks, Romans, and various other races from the East, as well as a chance encounter with an Egyptian now and then.

The Decapolis or those ten towns of the plateau the other side of the sea of Galilee—which spread from southern shore of the Sea of Galilee considerably southward along both banks of the Jordan River and thence eastward for quite a number of miles into what is modern-day Jordan—were largely inhabited by Gentiles. The land of Galilee, Judea and Idumea was made up of various races or mixtures of races.

Jesus grew up in a multiracial, multilingual society, where a young Jewish lad, especially one in “business” would have encountered all the assorted forms of racism, prejudice, curses and epithets common even unto this day.

How did Jesus manage to stay totally free from racial bias?

The answer is that He had God’s Holy Spirit without measure, and that the Spirit of God cannot tolerate the slightest inkling of racial prejudice or bias. (It is strongly implied that one of Jesus’ own disciples was black—Simon the Canaanite—and thus even the underpinnings of the New Testament Church of God could have been multiracial.)

The very personage who became Jesus Christ of Nazareth had earlier created all the races of man! I can well imagine that when the conversation turned to race, Jesus as a boy would never have taken great issue with someone who called Him “a dirty Jew.”

Never could Jesus have laughed at ethnic tales which tended to belittle or ridicule the members of another race merely because of their color of skin, stature, language, general physical or cultural characteristics. He knew that He was come unto the world, as well as unto His own people, and that He would be the “light of all men” and finally “draw all men unto myself.”

No doubt, through Jesus’ young life, there were any number of smirking little ruffians who knew how different He was, and continually tried to trip Him up in His lifestyle and His ways. Also there were no doubt other groups who attempted to entice Him to join with them in plotting some thuggery or other.

But Jesus had been learning the deep wisdom of the Proverbs, and would have recalled what some of them had said, “My son, if sinners entice you, do not consent. If they say, ‘Come with us, let us lie in wait for blood, let us wantonly ambush the innocent; . . . we shall find all precious goods, we shall fill our houses with spoil; throw in your lot among us, we will all have one purse.’”—Jesus would have remembered that Solomon said, “My son, do not walk in. the way with them, hold back your foot from their paths; for their feet run to evil, and they make haste to shed blood” (Prov. 1: 10-16, RSV).

“Chicken!” would not have dislodged Jesus from His stolid refusal to engage in the vicious antics of youthful gangs, since He knew they were all a group of filthy, sniffing little cowards and very likely told them so.

Also, Jesus was not ashamed of His father or His mother, or their business, their home, their background, or their example. (Not that they were perfect, in the sense that there was never a cross word, or that they lived an absolutely flawless life.)

Jesus could grow up as a young boy remembering that He was the one who had inspired Solomon to write, “Rejoice, O young man, in your youth. Let your heart cheer you all the days of your youth, and walk in the ways of your own heart, and in your own sight: but you had better understand that for every one of these things, even during your youthful days, God will bring you into judgment.

“Therefore, don’t be sorrowful about it, but put away evil from your day-to-day physical life, because a great deal of childhood and youth is an empty pursuit for less goals” (Eccl. 11: 9-10, paraphrased).

Chapter 4

Jesus and His Family

In the beginning of Jesus’ ministry, the narrative in the sixth chapter of Mark shows that He “went out from thence,” that is, from the shores of the Sea of Galilee, and came into His “own country” meaning Nazareth.

The local officials in the synagogue were astounded when Jesus suddenly appeared in the synagogue of Nazareth preaching and teaching and, true to human nature, they used the ancient old dodge, “Just who does he think he is?”

The account says they were astonished and said, “From whence hath this man these things? And what wisdom is this which is given unto him, that even such mighty works are wrought by his hands? Is not this the carpenter, the son of Mary, the brother of James, and Joses, and of Juda and of Simon? And are not his sisters here with us? And they were offended at him” (Mk. 6:2-3).

Jesus was a member of a large family; the eldest of at least seven children—at least four brothers (all named) and two sisters (plural!) in addition to Himself. Notice that this account occurs in the very beginning of His public ministry; this was apparently His first official appearance in the synagogue in His hometown of Nazareth. By no stretch of the imagination could these rulers of the synagogue have been referring to men by the name of James, Joses, Juda and Simon, nor could they have been referring to “His sisters,” in a religious sense. In no way could these religious leaders have meant that they understood that these individuals, whoever they were, were merely “acquaintances” of Jesus, and therefore were “spiritual brothers and sisters” rather than flesh-and-blood kin. Remember, this was the very beginning of Jesus’ ministry—the Pharisees knew of no disciples yet! These brothers and sisters would not have been “spiritual brothers and sisters, because there weren’t any yet known!

These petty complaints of Mark 6:2-3 should tell us a lot. First, they knew He had great wisdom; they knew He was performing miracles. Second, their remarks indicate that Joseph, Jesus’ legal father, was already dead, or they would have included him in their mention of the family members. Third, it proves Jesus lived most of His younger life in Nazareth; that He was a “carpenter” (contractor would be a better term today, as you will see), and that he had four brothers and at least two sisters!

For reasons of traditional doctrine, some religions refuse to admit this simple truth.

Some have argued, from Mark’s account in Mark 3:31 of Jesus’ mother and brother trying to communicate to Him through the crowd, that Jesus’ subsequent statement is proof that there were no real flesh and blood brothers but only Jesus’ brothers in the spiritual sense.

“‘And his mother and his brothers came; and standing outside they sent to him and called him. And a crowd was sitting about him; and they said to him, ‘Your mother and your brothers are outside asking for you!’

“And he replied, ‘Who are my mother and my brothers?’

“And looking around on those who sat about him, he said, ‘Here are my mother and my brothers! Whoever does the will of God is my brother, and sister, and mother’” (Mk. 3:31-35, RSV).

Jesus never failed to turn a statement, a question, a situation into a vivid spiritual lesson concerning His calling, His gospel message of the coming kingdom, and man’s brotherhood to fellow man.

In Jesus’ mind was the fullest awareness of His heavenly origins; His direct relationship to the entirety of the human race by virtue of being the very Creating Agent of the first human beings; His kinship to His own people, to whom He was sent; and finally by virtue of His teachings to His own disciples and close circle of confidants, the “brotherhood” which existed between Him and this group. Remember, however, that the leaders of the synagogue in Nazareth actually knew the names of Jesus’ flesh and blood brothers and listed each of them in their plaintive protest against Jesus’ miracles and His teachings—unable to believe that a local man could possess such powers.

John 2:12 is very plain. “After this he went down to Capernaum, he, and his mother, and his BRETHREN, and his disciples: and they continued there not many days.” Here, the biblical account written by John, that “disciple whom Jesus loved,” very clearly shows that His disciples and His “brethren” were two different groups of people.

Now read the critical verse of Mark 6:3 again. As Jesus was teaching in the synagogue, some of His persecutors began to say, “Is not this the carpenter, the son of Mary, the brother of James, and Joses, and of Juda, and Simon? And are not his sisters here with us? And they were offended at him. But Jesus said unto them, A prophet is not without honour, but in his own country, and among his own kin, and in his own house.”

Notice: Jesus plainly said “Among his OWN KIN.”

He plainly admitted, then, that He, the prophet who was being dishonored, was, at that time, in His own country, and among his own kin.

(The James who is mentioned here as one of Jesus’ brothers is spoken of as “the Lord’s brother” by the apostle Paul in Galatians 1: 19. It was this James who later became the leading apostle of the headquarters church in Jerusalem (Acts 15:13) and who wrote the book of James. Also, one of Jesus’ earliest disciples was James the son of Zebedee and the brother of John. Then, there was another man whose name was James, who was also one of Jesus’ disciples, who was the son of Alphaeus, and who was sometimes called “James the Less.”)

Jesus’ brothers and sisters were no doubt converted following His crucifixion and resurrection (though there is no record that they all were).

The events of their entire lives; of living with and around this remarkable man, seeing the throngs following Him and the vast ministry, which reached such proportions that people flocked up to the Galilean hills from as far away as Jerusalem and all the environs of Judea, and from as far north as up into modern Lebanon of today, the “seacoasts of Tyre and Sidon,” were a powerful witness to Jesus’ own kin.

They had known of His growing preoccupation with His ministry—His confrontation with Satan the Devil and His subsequent calling of His disciples—and had closely known of all the details of His ministry.

If there was any individual with the psychological hang-up which would have represented a true barrier to accept the plain truth about Jesus’ origins, it would have been His own flesh and blood brothers and sisters! (Incidentally, concerning these sisters, there is no reason really to limit the number of girls in the family to only two. There could have been three, or four, or even more.)

But the Resurrection PROVED it to them. They had grown up together; had eaten, played, worked, laughed and sung together; had taken lessons from their tutors together; and had been educated in the languages, history, geography, science and literature of the day together, most especially a thorough education in the sacred scriptures.

And what about Jesus’ brothers? Did they all die celibates? Were none married? Did none of them survive that tumultuous first century following the establishment of the New Testament Church to live normal lives and raise families?

Peter was married (Mat. 8:14, Luke 4:38, 1 Cor. 9:5). There is no proof one way or the other there were any children; though it is safe to assume there most certainly were, since this was the expected custom of the time, and it makes a great deal more understandable how Peter and Andrew (who some authorities say was Peter’s elder brother) were able to leave their family’s business, and to follow Christ in His journeys. If there were strong young sons coming along, brought up in the trade of their father, as was Jewish custom and tradition, then the narrative of Peter’s and Andrew’s call makes more sense. Of course, there could have been other brothers not mentioned.

But do you realize what some of this implies?

It merely implies that the human physical family of Jesus Christ of Nazareth did not necessarily die in the first century; that some of those family members no doubt did live and continue to build families and leave progeny after themselves. If this is true (and there seems every likelihood it is) then the descendants of those families directly related to Jesus Christ through Mary, that is, the progeny of Joseph and Mary and their ancestors, may still be walking this earth today!

Jesus, then, while He was not married, did grow up as a young man with brothers and sisters, and was very definitely a “family man” in the sense that He, as the elder brother, became the leader of the family, and directly responsible for it.

Not one more word is heard of Joseph after the mention of the word “parents” in the second chapter of Luke. From that time on, whenever Mary and the other children are mentioned, they are alone. Obviously, though the Bible does not record the event, Joseph had died some time after Christ’s twelfth birthday and prior to His thirtieth, Joseph is never mentioned, and is nowhere on the scene, during the, entirety of Christ’s ministry, or even at His death.

To some, it was even necessary for Mary to be “immaculately conceived,” in order that Christ’s birth could be as holy and “immaculate” as it properly should be. But, if Mary, why not her mother, grandmother, etc.? For that matter why not her father and his father, and so on?

Interesting, isn’t it—how some of the major doctrines of professing Christianity cannot be found in the Bible? There is no mention whatever of Mary being “immaculately conceived” and the words aren’t even used in the Bible.

Because of Augustinian guilt complexes, religious folk have taken the completely erroneous notion that sex is dirty, filthy, evil, and, even if necessary for the propagation of the human race, it is surely something of which to be ashamed.

For some to entertain in their minds that Mary was conceived in the same way they were—by the ghastly, evil, “dirty” method of (blush!) sexual intercourse—is unthinkable.

If Mary were “immaculately conceived” by a divine miracle, then she, and not Jesus, was the “first begotten” of God. This tends to place Mary above the Son of God, at least in form if not in substance. This seems to be the religion of millions. But the Bible teaches no such doctrine.

While Mary is deeply respected and honored in memory of her sacrifice (for that’s what it was!) in humbly accepting the calling of God to be chosen as the human mother by whom the very God of life would become human, there is no teaching whatever from Genesis to Revelation that she is to be worshiped. Respected, loved, yes; but worshiped, no. The Bible instructs that God (the Family of God including the Father and the Son) only is to be “worshiped”!

(The doctrine of the worship of Mary is as non-biblical as is the fable of the Trinity. Mary was said to have been found “with child of the Holy Spirit.” [As an aside, if the Holy Spirit were a person, then Jesus prayed to the wrong Father! Trinitarians admit that the Father is a distinct person of the Godhead. If He is the Father God, and the Father of Jesus, then it was He, by and through the limitless power of His Spirit, called the “Holy Spirit” that performed the miracle of Christ’s begetting as a human being.])

Mary was not “dirtied” or “defiled” or in some way unworthy of being named the mother of the son of God because she was conceived in the same way you and I were conceived.

God “invented” marriage, and commanded that a man and his wife “become one flesh” in the normal, wholesome embrace of human love, in sexual intercourse. God says, “Marriage is honourable in all, and the bed undefiled ...” (Heb. 13:4).

Neither was it a shame for Mary to have other children, after Jesus was born; and yes, these were conceived through sexual union with her husband. Even the plain language of Matthew 1:24 ought to tell any thinking person that. The Bible says, “Then Joseph being raised from sleep did as the angel of the Lord had bidden him, and took unto him his wife: And knew her not until she had brought forth her firstborn son: and he called his name JESUS.”

Even the translators of 1611 could not bring themselves to give the proper rendition of the Greek word by admitting it should have read, “And did not know her carnally until after . . .” or some similar rendering which would have made the verse more obvious.

The fact that Joseph “took unto him his wife is rather plain. The fact that Jesus was the “firstborn” implies a “secondborn,” and so on. The fact that Joseph “knew her” [carnally] not until” after Jesus was born is plainly indicative of the fact that Joseph did “know her” in full sexual intercourse after Jesus was born.

At the time of the annunciation and their journey to Bethlehem for the birth of their first child, Joseph was unable to afford anything more than a pair, of turtledoves as a dedication sacrifice (Lev. 12:8; Luke 2:24). Apparently, he could not afford the price of a lamb.

This has been taken by some to imply that Joseph and Mary were in a state of near poverty. While obviously not “wealthy” by any standards, Joseph, however, was an industrious worker and a more than adequate provider. Remember, they had been forced to make an arduous journey at a critical time in Mary’s pregnancy. No doubt, it required extra expense for proper animals and conveyances to insure Mary a comfortable trip. Further, there was the problem of taxation, of enforced payoffs to various petty officials, Roman soldiers or others along the route.

The family God selected to be the human guardian and physical mother of the very Son of God would have measured up to the strictest standards of God’s own laws of Industry, labor, honesty and thrift.

God’s laws established principles of hard work, and Joseph would have followed those principles diligently. There was no spiritual or biblical requirement that Joseph and his family be wealthy; but there is every reason to believe there was a strong requirement that he measure up to the biblical “work ethic” of the Old Testament.

The biblical principles demanded that a man be energetic and hard-working enough to lay up for “his children’s children” indicating that each tradesman was fully expected according to God’s Word to be successful enough that he would, at the end of his life, have provided a sufficient estate that even his grandchildren would be given a little head start in their own careers.

So, accepting the biblical account at face value, then, it is simply inconceivable that Joseph was anything less than moderately successful; not necessarily wealthy but certainly not poor. He would not have had a single child more than he could have afforded or provided for; and each of the children would have been partners with him as soon as his physical stature and grasp of the trade allowed.

The word “carpenter” relating to Joseph is very misleading in modern terminology, and is far better rendered “stone mason” or “artisan.” The Greek word is tekton and most biblical authorities agree it had a far wider application than merely the term “carpenter” as it might be applied today. In our specialized societies, carpenters are thought of as those who work with sawn and hewn lumber, and primarily work only at pounding nails into boards.

Ask a modern carpenter if this is “all he does” and he will very likely give you a lengthy lecture about the many skills required to become a good carpenter.

However, during the day of Jesus Christ, “carpentry” included much more than just the fabrication of wooden dwellings. Most of the homes were a combination of stone, mud and clay, hewn beams and “lumber.”

The city where Jesus spent much of His early ministry around the Galilean area was Capernaum. I have been to Capernaum several times, and have seen the remnants of the porches, the arches, the mosaics, and the walls of the buildings which were there during the time of Christ.

Capernaum, at that time, was a beaming, modern, beautifully sculptured Grecian-type city. It was filled with beautiful multileveled homes which had large central gardens, mosaic walks, fountains and even, believe it or not, indoor bathrooms and steam baths!

The homes of the wealthier class at that time were marvels of architecture; and a far cry from the stone and adobe hovels imagined by many as being the general domicile of the time.

A “carpenter” would have to have a certain familiarity with mathematics, engineering principles (working with block and tackle, levers, and knowing how to construct arches and cantilever overhanging balconies, etc.) and especially would have to be skillful in finishing work, such as interior surfaces, mosaic hallways and walkways, and would even have to know a certain amount about plumbing.

For, during that period and in, the first two or three centuries thereafter, home, plumbing included indoor water, which was delivered via a system of pipes and could be cut off by valves just as in a modern home today.

From their earliest age Jesus and His brothers learned the skills of the trade, and Jesus, as the older brother, could well have been the one primarily concerned with keeping of family records, payment of bills, ordering of materials, the writing and signing of contracts, and the required barter, both in the marketplace and with passing caravans, for tools and building supplies.

From earliest moments of boyhood, Jesus, James, Joseph, and later little Simon would perhaps run down to the public market when they had heard the tinkling of the bells of a long heavily laden caravan coming through the area from the trade routes from the north and the east, realizing that it might be a timely opportunity to purchase some finely made tapestries, rugs, yardage of fine fabrics for Mary and the girls to make into clothing, or perhaps even some of the famous metal tools, adzes, drawknives, chisels and heavier quarrying tools produced by the nations to the east.

Probably by the time Jesus was in His late teens or early twenties, His legal guardian Joseph was dead. The family business passed into the hands of Jesus, His eldest son, together with the other brothers.

Jesus grew up in a family environment, with an intelligent and well educated group of young men and women maturing under the careful guardianship of Joseph until his death, and later under the love, warmth and sympathetic concern of Mary.

A greater grasp of the New Testament would lead any thinking person to ponder whether the great God—who shows us that the family represents the most basic building block of society, the underpinning of civilization, and the unit which is held up in the Bible as a divinely ordained unit and used as a direct analogy of the relationship between Christ and His Church—would have been an only child, and never would have known the sharing, giving, close relationship of a family.

The family’s concerns were Jesus’ concerns for the bulk of His life on this earth. While His intensive studies and private tutelage sessions, plus His countless hours spent in fervent prayer and even fasting from time to time, were diligently preparing Him for the tumultuous and challenging ministry He was later to fulfill, from His boyhood and on up through His early teenage and beyond, Jesus learned that close-knit experience of living among the members of His own family and the conduct of a family trade.

The family took yearly trips to Jerusalem on the occasion of annual holy days, and perhaps went twice a year or even more. Other shorter trips might have included a visit to the Mediterranean Sea in the Syrophoenician coastland (a place to which Jesus resorted for a-much-needed rest during a particular stressful part of His ministry later on), to the snow-covered mountains of Hermon, or down into the beautiful Sharon valley and to the Mediterranean.

Was Jesus ever cheated?

Surely, Jesus’ reputation as a tradesman was one of total honesty and generosity, and there were no doubt a great number of individuals who felt He was “an easy mark” for shyster deals.

Jesus would have never entered into a loud argument with other tradesmen, suppliers, or homeowners about alleged mishandling of money or goods. His entire message later showed that gentle and meek spirit of a willingness to accept abuse, of turning the other cheek, of gladly handing a man an inner garment and also giving, if required, an outer one, and if, being pressed by a Roman soldier riding the mail circuit to carry the heavy mail sacks, not only to walk the required mile in the cool mountain elevations of Nazareth’s beautiful conifers, but to go an extra mile or so down the trail with the Roman before turning back home.

It is a great mistake to erase from your minds the entire life story, personality, boyhood, family environment and building trade of Jesus the carpenter, and try only to imagine Him in some super-religious postures, as a mature man during His ministry, gleaned from a few accounts in the gospels.

Though God did not intend to give us a lengthy biography of Jesus’ boyhood, neither did He want the terrible perversion of the plain truth concerning Christ’s early life, which portrays Him as an only child, a sorrowful-eyed vagabond who seemingly appears out of nowhere at about age 30 and begins challenging the religious leaders with His strange doctrines.

Chapter 5

Jesus in Palestine —
The Historical Facts

The importance of Jesus Christ’s life and death is recorded in the New Testament. Yet for those who do not accept the New Testament as accurate history, other records have been preserved which clearly show that the human life of Jesus Christ was fact—not fiction.

In times past and present, some atheists and agnostics have gone so far as to claim that no real evidence exists outside the New Testament to prove that Jesus of Nazareth actually lived, and died. And the New Testament, of course, is dismissed as a pious fraud.

It is true that no record of the crucifixion of Jesus has come down to us from Pilate himself. But other records have been preserved which do mention Jesus of Nazareth. These records are non-Christian in origin and, hence, can be regarded as neutral, disinterested, historical proof of Jesus’ life and subsequent crucifixion by the Romans.

Writing around the end of the first Century A.D., the Roman historian Suetonius tells us that in A.D. 49 the Emperor Claudius banished all Jews from the city of Rome (an incident also mentioned in Acts 18:2): “He expelled the Jews from Rome, on account of the, riots in which they were constantly indulging, at the instigation of Chrestus” (Claudius, 25, 4).

“Chrestus” was a common misspelling of the name of Christ. These riots were probably a result of the recent arrival in Rome of Christianity, which would have caused considerable dissension in the Jewish community there, as it did elsewhere (see, for example, Acts 21:31). Writing many years later, Suetonius doubtless misunderstood the police records of the rioting and took the name of “Chrestus” to refer to some individual of that name.

A more detailed account of Christ comes from the Roman historian Tacitus. Writing between A.D. 115 and 117, Tacitus tells us that in A.D. 64 the Emperor Nero tried to blame the disastrous fire in Rome on the Christians. Tacitus then goes on to describe these Christians: “They got their name from Christ, who was executed by sentence of the Procurator Pontius Pilate in the reign of Tiberius. That checked the pernicious superstition for a short time, but it broke out afresh—not only in Judea, where the plague first arose, but in Rome itself, where all the horrible and shameful things in the world collect and find a home” (Annals, XV,44).

From Tacitus’s comments it is clear he had no sympathy for Christianity. Yet for him there was no question that its founder actually lived and was executed by Pontius Pilate while he was procurator over Judea several decades earlier. Tacitus was not writing from hearsay. He was a Roman historian of note; he had access to official court records, diplomatic correspondence and Roman archives. Aside from his pagan, anti-Christian bias, his account is a reliable confirmation of the New Testament account of Christ’s death and its aftermath.

Roman historians are not the only ones who tell us of Jesus of Nazareth. Ancient Jewish traditions preserved in the Talmud also mention Him. Jewish scholars generally agree that some traditions of Jesus’ death by crucifixion were maintained among the Jews for several centuries after the event and were finally put in written form in the Babylonian Talmud about A.D. 500. One such passage—which some think refers to Jesus, though a number feel it refers to someone else—reads as follows: “On the eve of Passover they hanged Yeshu and the herald went before him for forty days saying, He is going forth to be stoned in that he hath practiced sorcery and beguiled and led astray Israel. Let everyone knowing aught in his defense come and plead for him. But they found naught in his defense and hanged him on the eve of Passover” (Sanhedrin, 43A).

Another account of Jesus is found in the writings of the famous Jewish historian Flavius Josephus of the first century AD. However, historians feel that the passage was later altered by a Christian scribe to make Josephus say that Jesus was possibly the Messiah—something Josephus himself probably did not write. However, one Jewish scholar has rendered the passage as follows: “Now, there was about this time Jesus, a wise man; for he was a doer of wonderful works, a teacher of such men as receive the truth with pleasure. He drew over to him both many of the Jews and many of the Gentiles. And when Pilate, at the suggestion of the principal men among us, had condemned him to the cross, those that loved him at the first ceased not so to do; and the race of Christians, so named from him are not extinct even now” (Klausner, Jesus of Nazareth, pp. 55-56).

Josephus also mentions Jesus briefly in another passage which scholars feel is quite genuine: “He [Annas] convened a judicial session of the Sanhedrin and brought before it the brother of Jesus the so-called Christ—James by name—and some others, whom he charged with breaking the law and handed over to be stoned to death (Josephus, Antiquities, XX,200).

Many other accounts, mostly fragmentary, have come down to us besides the ones that are quoted here. Many of these give further details which corroborate the New Testament accounts of Jesus. These documents so vindicate the New Testament record that Professor Klausner stated: “If we possessed them alone, we should know nothing except that in Judaea there had existed a Jew named Jesus who was called the Christ, the ‘Anointed’; that he performed miracles and taught the people; that he was killed by Pontius Pilate at the instigation of the Jews; that he had a brother named James, who was put to death by the High Priest Annas, the son of Annas; that owing to Jesus there arose a special sect known as Christians; that a community belonging to this sect existed in Rome fifty years after the birth of Jesus, and that from the time of Nero, the sect greatly increased; regarded Jesus as virtually divine, and underwent severe persecution” (Jesus of Nazareth, p. 62).

False concepts of a false Jesus would be at least partially removed by understanding more of the environment that was Palestine during Jesus’ day. Few understand the true picture of Jesus as framed in the social customs, the type of architecture, the flow of commerce and business, and the whole panorama of Jewish life during that Herodian period.

It is incredible that so many books of theological research, Bible dictionaries, histories of the Holy Land, and other works on the life and time of Jesus use the illustrations of a Palestine of the turn of the century—the old woodcuts, travelogue photos, and oft-reprinted scenes of the bleak ruins of ancient cities, Bedouin tents, camel caravans, filthy streets and rocky, barren hillsides—which tend to leave the impression that this is the Palestine of the time of Christ.

Nothing could be further from the truth.

The land that is now drastically depleted, mostly deforested, heavily eroded and reduced to dust, was, almost nineteen hundred years ago, a verdant, beautiful, rich part of the world, virtually unrivaled in industry, wealth and strength.

If you could have walked the streets of the cities of Capernaum, Nazareth, through any of the confederation of the Decapolis—the ten towns in the Galilean region—you would have been startled by the quality and wealth. And Jerusalem itself? You would have been even more amazed than were Jesus’ own disciples over the beauty, magnificence and size of Jerusalem, especially of those buildings associated with the temple.

In ancient times, God had promised the Israelites a land “flowing with milk and honey.” One remembers the account of the spies sent to search out the land who came back with tales not only of giant men, but of fruits and produce so abundant and so large that they are virtually unknown among modern agricultural products today.

The implication of the account of one cluster of grapes being carried on a pole by two men is clear; each grape must have been about the size of a plum or a lemon!

“And they came to the Valley of Eshcol, and cut down from there a branch with a single cluster of grapes, and they carried it on a pole between two of them; they brought also some pomegranates and figs.

“And they came to Moses ... and they told him, ‘We came to the land to which you sent us; it flows with milk and honey, and this is its fruit’” (Num. 13:23-27, RSV).

The early Israelites weren’t only impressed by the gigantic size of the fruits and produce of the land—they were frightened to death at the size of the people living, there! They said, “. . . all the people that we saw in it are men of great stature . . . and we seemed to ourselves like grasshoppers...” (Num. 13:32-33). It is logical to have expected that the largest and therefore strongest peoples would populate the richest areas.

The land of Israel combines every variety of climate, from the perennial snows on beautiful Mount Hermon and the cooler higher elevations of Lebanon, to the more pleasant warmth of the valleys of Galilee, and the tropical and humid climate of the Jordan River facing the Mediterranean Sea. According to the most ancient records, every fish imaginable teemed the waters of that country (fishing was a major industry as evidenced by some of Jesus’ own disciples’ occupations) and birds and wild fowl were abundant.

In your mind’s eye, you need to imagine a country more like some of the western mountain states of the United States—perhaps portions of northern or central California, but in a much smaller area, encompassing a deep depression (such as Death Valley) wherein lies the Salt Sea and the terminus of the Jordan River, together with lofty snow clad mountains, higher elevations festooned with conifers of every sort, especially the world-famed “Cedars of Lebanon,” seemingly endless corn and pasture lands, terraced hills covered with olives and vines, glades and pleasant valleys bubbling with springs and streams. Naturally, by the time of Christ, a great deal of the land had been abused and no small amount of depletion of natural resources and subsequent erosion and loss of arable soil had already occurred. Still, it was immensely richer than it is today.

Therefore, although many glowing accounts of the beauty of that land exist in the books of Exodus, Leviticus, and some of the major prophets, descriptions of pastures which seemed to be “clothed with flocks” and of “the land of milk and honey” may not have been quite so accurate by Jesus’ day. Nevertheless, abundant literature exists, and archaeological finds substantiate, that the Palestine of Jesus’ day was luxuriously wealthy in natural resources; dotted with towns and cities that were resplendent examples of the finest engineering and architectural principles of that day and represented one of the most important possessions of the Roman Empire. Palestine was prized for its exports of fruit, grains, olives, wine, oils, spices, and the by no means meager returns to Roman treasuries from the heavy system of taxation imposed upon the people.

Herod was a great builder. Not only was the temple during Jesus’ day an absolute marvel of glittering stone and beautiful architecture, but there were so many fortresses, palaces, temples, amphitheaters and public monuments that it was said even in faraway Rome that some structures of the area of Palestine were among the very finest in the empire, looked upon as a jewel in the crown of Caesar himself.

Try to imagine the city of Capernaum, which in fact was a most important city, and frequently mentioned by the writers of the Bible in connection with the life and ministry of Jesus.

Millions of Bible illiterates think of Christ’s ministry as having taken place in the streets of Jerusalem. Many suppose His “Sermon on the Mount” was probably delivered on the “Mount of Olives” adjacent to Jerusalem—few seem to understand most of this Ministry was conducted in northern Israel, around Capernaum and the dozens of towns in Galilee.

Galilee was a motley collection of many races and religions, distinctly tainted with foreign and distasteful elements, in the opinion of the religious bigots of Jerusalem.

Galileans were generally regarded as a crude half-breed lot, looked upon with Varying degrees of pity and contempt. The present-day attitudes of some New Englanders toward those from Dixie with a “Southern drawl” might be an appropriate analogy. That’s why the intellectual and spiritual leaders of Jerusalem called Christ and His disciples a crude and “unlearned” lot, without academic or spiritual credentials.

Even though Jesus grew up in Nazareth after His family returned from their exile in Egypt, Joseph’s business took him and his sons into the other cities and towns in the Galilean area. Remember that a young Jewish boy was expected to join the adult community at about age 12; that it was a sober time of Roman occupation, heavy taxation and poverty, ferment and potential for rebellion (there had been a spate of abortive attempts at Maccabean revivals), and the fear of the life-and-death power of the religious leaders, as well as the oppressive rule of the previous Herod.

It was hardly a cheerful time for carefree young children to grow up with time on their hands for endless play and daydreams. Jesus had been taught His father’s trade from His earliest youth, and no doubt labored, first at His father’s side (Joseph), and, following Joseph’s death, as the head of the family and its business.

His building trade was well known throughout the area; and, just as it is quite common for a contractor or a carpenter to live in a home built with his own hands, by his own design, or by his own firm, so Jesus and His brothers, Joses, Simon, Jude and James, together with their helpers, must have constructed a large home for their family in Capernaum.

That home in Capernaum and the city itself are prominent in the early ministry of Jesus. When Jesus would return to Capernaum He was said to have been “at home” (Mark 2: 1, RSV). His disciple Matthew (also called Levi), writer of the first of the gospels, was a resident of that city as well (Matt. 9: 9).

According to archaeological discoveries, the city of Capernaum, like many other port cities, seemed to be divided into two distinct sections. The one part was almost wholly devoted to the fishery industry, the other to the business and residential sections of what was one of the finest cities of that part of the world.

Peter and Andrew both lived in nearby Bethsaida, along the shore of the lake a few miles further south (Mark 1:29), and Peter owned a home there (Matt. 8:14; Mark 1:30; Luke 4:38).

Try to imagine that you are standing in one of the main streets in Capernaum. You would no doubt see houses of all types, differing in size and scope depending entirely upon the substance and wealth of the owners; the houses would range from small cottages only 30 or 40 feet square, on up to large homes of the fairly wealthy of two or even three stories or more. While not common, it would, not have been rare to see any number of homes of two stories or more which would have featured rich architectural embellishments of pillars and decorative friezes, built in the style of the Roman villas of the same period.

On entering such a home, you would have noticed the beautiful stone work, or marble or more expensive stone, the walls painted with delicate colors such as vermilion (or white-washed), and a large interior courtyard, where you would have seen a pool and possibly a fountain. Opening to either side would be living quarters, and to the rear and upstairs would be large public rooms for dining and family meetings. A wide stairway of beautiful quarried stone would lead directly from the street up the side of the home to the rooftop. Building codes of the time required that the large rooftops be provided with decorative handrails to protect people from falling. The roof would probably have been paved with brick or stone, or possibly one of the cements used at the time. The roofs always sloped slightly toward the front, so that the cisterns (sometimes contained even within the homes themselves) were filled with rainwater by ducts which caught the rains of the wet season.

It would be quite common to see families of the cities of Palestine—including Jerusalem and those of the Galilean area—gather in the cool of an evening on their roof-tops for discussion or to call to the neighbors across the way. Actually, the way the homes were built it was possible to go from roof to roof. Rabbinic literature spoke of the “road of the roofs.” Read Jesus’ statement in Matthew 24 of one who might be caught on the housetop during the time of severe national crisis. (He was speaking both of the destruction of Jerusalem in A.D. 70 and of a time called in the Bible “the Great Tribulation” yet ahead.) Jesus told them not to come down to take anything which might be in their house, indicating that they could use the “road of the, roofs,” passing from roof to roof until, perhaps at the final home in the block, they might make good their escape by descending to the ground.

Once, Jesus was gathered together with His disciples and a large crowd of people inside His own home in the city of Capernaum. A group of people, desperate to have their sick friend healed, took up the stones of the roof and let the sick man down into the large upper room where Jesus was. “And again he entered again into Capernaum after some days; and it was noised that he was in the house. And straightway many were gathered, insomuch that there was no room to receive them, no, not so much as about the door: and he preached the word unto them. And they came unto him, bringing one sick of the palsy, which was borne of four. And when they could not come nigh unto him for the press, they uncovered the roof where he was: And when they had broken it up, they let down the bed wherein the sick of the palsy lay. When Jesus saw their faith, he said unto the sick of the palsy, Son, thy sins be forgiven thee” (Mark 2:1-5).

This reveals that Jesus was in a home which was obviously His own. It was noised abroad that He was “in the house” which is rendered by other translations “at home.” This also illustrates the fact that those who were so anxious to have their friend healed were easily able to climb to the rooftop via the outer stairway.

Jesus was in His own home, either in a large upper room capable of accommodating more than one hundred persons, or, possibly, in a large central courtyard that was a feature of Jewish homes of that size and scale. Servants’ quarters and the vestibule for guests were located near the front, sleeping quarters around both sides, and larger upper rooms toward the rear with a large family kitchen. It was not unusual for such homes to have interior fountains with plantings, and many of them would have been open to the outside air, not unlike those Spanish villas designed at a much later time.

Jesus’ ministry centered around the area of Capernaum, and later, the city where He grew up and was so well known, Nazareth. The synagogue into which He entered and healed the man with a wither