<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Defense Secretary Mark Esper - Garner Ted Armstrong Evangelistic Association</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org/tag/defense-secretary-mark-esper/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org</link>
	<description>Let No Man Take Your Crown</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2020 03:04:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	

 
	<item>
		<title>New US position on South China Sea raises risk of clash with China at sea</title>
		<link>https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org/new-us-position-on-south-china-sea-raises-risk-of-clash-with-china-at-sea/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=new-us-position-on-south-china-sea-raises-risk-of-clash-with-china-at-sea</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Philip J. Heimans and Andreo Calonzo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2020 03:04:38 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Far East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Communist Party (China)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense Secretary Mark Esper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donald Trump]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greg Poling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Pompeo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South China Sea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teodoro Locsin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UN Convention for the Law of the Sea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States (US)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US-China relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zhao Lijian]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.garnertedarmstrong.org/?p=34269</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>While the two nations are sparring on everything from Covid-19 to Hong Kong, the sea remains the most likely spot to have their warships and fighter jets actually collide. South China Sea (Representational image) &#124; Photo: www.pacom.mil Singapore/Manila: The Trump administration’s &#8230; <a class="kt-excerpt-readmore" href="https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org/new-us-position-on-south-china-sea-raises-risk-of-clash-with-china-at-sea/" aria-label="New US position on South China Sea raises risk of clash with China at sea">Read More</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org/new-us-position-on-south-china-sea-raises-risk-of-clash-with-china-at-sea/">New US position on South China Sea raises risk of clash with China at sea</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org">Garner Ted Armstrong Evangelistic Association</a>.</p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="td-post-sub-title">While the two nations are sparring on everything from Covid-19 to Hong Kong, the sea remains the most likely spot to have their warships and fighter jets actually collide.</p>
<p><img decoding="async" src="https://d2c7ipcroan06u.cloudfront.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/South-China-Sea.JPG-image-696x392.jpg" alt="South China Sea" /><br />
South China Sea (Representational image) | Photo: www.pacom.mil</p>
<hr />
<p><strong>Singapore/Manila:</strong> The Trump administration’s move to brand most of Beijing’s claims in the South China Sea a violation of international law doesn’t mean much on its own: China has repeatedly refused to acknowledge the 2016 tribunal ruling that the U.S. finally just endorsed.</p>
<p class="_yeti_done">But analysts fear it could lead to a miscalculation at sea if it prompts the Communist Party to become more aggressive in asserting its claims, both to rebuff the U.S. and to deter other claimants in Southeast Asia to avoid taking action. China’s campaign to build artificial structures intensified after the Obama administration announced a “pivot” to Asia in 2011.</p>
<p>“This may not necessarily change the texture of what the U.S. military is already doing in the South China Sea,” said Collin Koh Swee Lean, research fellow at Singapore’s S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. “The concern we have is the Chinese may decide to step up their challenge against these U.S. activities in the SCS, thus increasing the risk of incidents.”</p>
<div class="code-block code-block-1"></div>
<p>While the U.S. and China are sparring on everything from trade to Covid-19 to Hong Kong, the South China Sea remains the most likely spot for the two powers to have their warships and fighter jets actually collide. Defense Secretary Mark Esper has said he wants to deploy more U.S. forces to confront China, and the U.S. Navy appears to be stepping up freedom of navigation operations challenging Beijing’s territorial claims. Earlier this month two U.S. aircraft carriers conducted exercises in the South China Sea.</p>
<p>“The Trump administration is trying to find all the nails they can to hammer into the coffin,” said Zhu Feng, executive dean of the Collaborative Innovation Center of South China Sea Studies at Nanjing University. “On the one hand it’s exploiting the China factor for the elections, but in general the U.S. has fundamentally changed its attitude towards China.”</p>
<div class="css-1dbjc4n r-18u37iz r-1mi0q7o">
<div class="css-1dbjc4n r-eqz5dr r-1777fci r-5f2r5o r-1kh6xel">
<div class="css-1dbjc4n r-1wbh5a2 r-dnmrzs r-1ny4l3l">
<div class="css-1dbjc4n r-1awozwy r-18u37iz r-dnmrzs">
<div class="css-901oao css-bfa6kz r-hkyrab r-1qd0xha r-a023e6 r-vw2c0b r-ad9z0x r-bcqeeo r-1ddef8g r-3s2u2q r-qvutc0" dir="auto"><span class="css-901oao css-16my406 r-1qd0xha r-ad9z0x r-bcqeeo r-qvutc0">Secretary Pompeo</span>@SecPompeo</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="css-1dbjc4n">
<div class="css-901oao r-hkyrab r-1dqbpge r-1qd0xha r-1b6yd1w r-16dba41 r-ad9z0x r-bcqeeo r-bnwqim r-qvutc0" dir="auto" lang="en"><span class="css-901oao css-16my406 r-1qd0xha r-ad9z0x r-bcqeeo r-qvutc0"><span class="css-901oao css-16my406 r-1qd0xha r-ad9z0x r-bcqeeo r-qvutc0">We are strengthening U.S. policy on South China Sea maritime claims, according to international law, in rejection of Beijing’s intimidation, bullying, and claims of maritime empire.<br />
</span></span></p>
<hr />
<p><span class="css-901oao css-16my406 r-1qd0xha r-ad9z0x r-bcqeeo r-qvutc0"><span class="css-901oao css-16my406 r-1qd0xha r-ad9z0x r-bcqeeo r-qvutc0">​U.S. Secretary of State Michael Pompeo’s statement on Monday denouncing what he called a “completely unlawful” campaign by China over fish and energy deposits across most of the sea, which is vital for global trade and has territorial disputes involving six governments, marked the fourth anniversary of a ruling by a United Nations tribunal in favor of the Philippines against Beijing. China has said the tribunal had no jurisdiction, as Beijing had earlier said it wouldn’t abide by dispute settlement mechanisms for under the UN Convention for the Law of the Sea, known as Unclos.<br />
</span></span></p>
<h3><strong>‘Maritime Empire’</strong></h3>
<p>“The world will not allow Beijing to treat the South China Sea as its maritime empire,” Pompeo said. “America stands with our Southeast Asian allies and partners in protecting their sovereign rights to offshore resources, consistent with their rights and obligations under international law.”</p>
<p>China immediately fired back, with Foreign Ministry spokesperson Zhao Lijian on Tuesday rejecting Pompeo’s statement and accusing the U.S. of “doing all it can to stir up trouble in the South China Sea and drive a wedge between regional countries and China.” Another spokesperson, Hua Chunying, said China has no working oil rigs in disputed areas of the South China Sea and said the country is committed to upholding freedom of navigation and overflight.</p>
<hr />
<div class="css-1dbjc4n r-18u37iz r-1mi0q7o">
<div class="css-1dbjc4n r-eqz5dr r-1777fci r-5f2r5o r-1kh6xel">
<div class="css-1dbjc4n r-1wbh5a2 r-dnmrzs r-1ny4l3l">
<div class="css-1dbjc4n r-1awozwy r-18u37iz r-dnmrzs">
<div class="css-901oao css-bfa6kz r-hkyrab r-1qd0xha r-a023e6 r-vw2c0b r-ad9z0x r-bcqeeo r-1ddef8g r-3s2u2q r-qvutc0" dir="auto"><span class="css-901oao css-16my406 r-1qd0xha r-ad9z0x r-bcqeeo r-qvutc0">Hua Chunying 华春莹</span>@SpokespersonCHN</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="css-1dbjc4n">
<div class="css-901oao r-hkyrab r-1dqbpge r-1qd0xha r-1b6yd1w r-16dba41 r-ad9z0x r-bcqeeo r-bnwqim r-qvutc0" dir="auto" lang="en"><span class="css-901oao css-16my406 r-1qd0xha r-ad9z0x r-bcqeeo r-qvutc0">6. It is the </span><span class="r-18u37iz"><a class="css-4rbku5 css-18t94o4 css-901oao css-16my406 r-1n1174f r-1loqt21 r-1qd0xha r-ad9z0x r-bcqeeo r-qvutc0" dir="ltr" role="link" href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/US?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1282957940794617857%7Ctwgr%5E&amp;ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Ftheprint.in%2Fworld%2Fnew-us-position-on-south-china-sea-raises-risk-of-clash-with-china-at-sea%2F460951%2F&amp;src=hashtag_click" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" data-focusable="true">#US</a></span><span class="css-901oao css-16my406 r-1qd0xha r-ad9z0x r-bcqeeo r-qvutc0"><span class="css-901oao css-16my406 r-1qd0xha r-ad9z0x r-bcqeeo r-qvutc0">, not China, that believes in &#8220;might makes right&#8221; &amp; resorts to force &amp; intimidation at every turn. It is the US that has waged color revolutions &amp; illegal wars, displacing millions in Iraq, Libya &amp; Afghanistan. China has never started any war.<br />
</span></span></p>
<hr />
<p><span class="css-901oao css-16my406 r-1qd0xha r-ad9z0x r-bcqeeo r-qvutc0"><span class="css-901oao css-16my406 r-1qd0xha r-ad9z0x r-bcqeeo r-qvutc0">The risk of an accident in the South China Sea leading to a larger standoff has risen “as de-escalation will be complicated by the deteriorating relationship,” the Eurasia Group said in an analysis published Tuesday. It also said that China might be more likely to declare an air defense identification zone over the waters, “which would attempt to force international commercial and military jets to recognize China’s sovereignty.”<br />
</span></span>“The U.S. and China do not want to have an open conflict or a war over this issue, but the problem is on the ground,” said Zheng Yongnian, director of the East Asian Institute at the National University of Singapore. “ If there is no effective communication between top leaders on the issue, it is easy for the situation to get out of control.”</p>
<p>The South China Sea encompasses an area roughly the size of India, and China claims more than 80% of the waters. So far, Beijing has reclaimed some 3,200 acres (1,290 hectares) of land on seven reefs or rocks in the Spratly archipelago, constructing ports, lighthouses, and runways. It has installed missile batteries and other military equipment.</p>
<p>The U.S. stance marks the first time it has explicitly endorsed the substance of the tribunal ruling and declared that China has no right whatsoever to waters and seabed off its neighbors’ coasts, according to Greg Poling, director of the Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative in Washington. That should lead to stronger objections to China’s moves to intimidate on fishing and oil and gas drilling, he said, as well as adding pressure on other countries to speak up more.</p>
<p>“It’s a bigger deal than it might seem at first,” he said. “The U.S. is still neutral on who ultimately owns which disputed island, but it’s now firmly on the side of the Southeast Asians when it comes to most of the waters.”</p>
<p>Still, at least one key claimant didn’t see things spinning out of control. Philippine Foreign Secretary Teodoro Locsin, whose country has moved closer to China in recent years, said on Twitter that the world’s biggest economies still needed each other to recover following the global pandemic.</p>
<hr />
<div class="css-1dbjc4n r-18u37iz r-1mi0q7o">
<div class="css-1dbjc4n r-eqz5dr r-1777fci r-5f2r5o r-1kh6xel">
<div class="css-1dbjc4n r-1wbh5a2 r-dnmrzs r-1ny4l3l">
<div class="css-1dbjc4n r-1awozwy r-18u37iz r-dnmrzs">
<div class="css-901oao css-bfa6kz r-hkyrab r-1qd0xha r-a023e6 r-vw2c0b r-ad9z0x r-bcqeeo r-1ddef8g r-3s2u2q r-qvutc0" dir="auto"><span class="css-901oao css-16my406 r-1qd0xha r-ad9z0x r-bcqeeo r-qvutc0">Teddy Locsin Jr.</span>@teddyboylocsin</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="css-1dbjc4n">
<div class="css-901oao r-hkyrab r-1dqbpge r-1qd0xha r-1b6yd1w r-16dba41 r-ad9z0x r-bcqeeo r-bnwqim r-qvutc0" dir="auto" lang="en"><span class="css-901oao css-16my406 r-1qd0xha r-ad9z0x r-bcqeeo r-qvutc0"><span class="css-901oao css-16my406 r-1qd0xha r-ad9z0x r-bcqeeo r-qvutc0">I didn&#8217;t think so. Let&#8217;s face it, China and the US need each other for a fuller faster post-COVID recovery. Theirs are complementary economies with each other and the rest of Southeast Asia, Australia, Latin America, Canada, and even Europe.<br />
</span></span></p>
<hr />
<div class="css-1dbjc4n r-1hfyk0a r-1qfoi16 r-m611by">
<div class="css-1dbjc4n r-1wbh5a2 r-dnmrzs r-1ny4l3l" aria-haspopup="false">
<div class="css-1dbjc4n r-1awozwy r-18u37iz r-1wbh5a2 r-dnmrzs r-1ny4l3l">
<div class="css-1dbjc4n r-1awozwy r-18u37iz r-dnmrzs">
<div class="css-901oao css-bfa6kz r-hkyrab r-1qd0xha r-a023e6 r-vw2c0b r-ad9z0x r-bcqeeo r-3s2u2q r-qvutc0" dir="auto"><span class="css-901oao css-16my406 r-1qd0xha r-ad9z0x r-bcqeeo r-qvutc0">Lyle Morris</span>@LyleJMorris</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="css-1dbjc4n r-15d164r r-1g94qm0 r-1hfyk0a r-1qfoi16">
<div class="css-901oao r-hkyrab r-164hfdd r-1qd0xha r-a023e6 r-16dba41 r-ad9z0x r-bcqeeo r-bnwqim r-qvutc0" dir="auto" lang="en"><span class="css-901oao css-16my406 r-1qd0xha r-ad9z0x r-bcqeeo r-qvutc0"><span class="css-901oao css-16my406 r-1qd0xha r-ad9z0x r-bcqeeo r-qvutc0">Thread: There is much confusion about the new SCS policy shift. To clarify, the new policy is NOT rejecting ALL PRC territorial and maritime claims in the SCS, contrary to what is out there in the press.<br />
</span></span></p>
<hr />
<p>The U.S. move would only be effective if it follows up with claimant states in the region to find ways to exert more pressure against China, Murray Hiebert, BowerGroupAsia’s head of research and a non-resident senior associate at the Center for Strategic and International Studies’s Southeast Asia Program, said during a virtual briefing on the South China Sea.</p>
<p>“It’s stronger than what was said before, but one of the problems we have with the current administration is they make very strong statements on an issue and disappear for months at a time,” he said. “That means it’s really not that effective.” – <em>Bloomberg<br />
</em></p>
<hr />
<p>Source: <a href="https://theprint.in/world/new-us-position-on-south-china-sea-raises-risk-of-clash-with-china-at-sea/460951/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://theprint.in/world/new-us-position-on-south-china-sea-raises-risk-of-clash-with-china-at-sea/460951/</a></p>
[<a href="https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org/news/disclaimer/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Disclaimer</a>]
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div><p>The post <a href="https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org/new-us-position-on-south-china-sea-raises-risk-of-clash-with-china-at-sea/">New US position on South China Sea raises risk of clash with China at sea</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org">Garner Ted Armstrong Evangelistic Association</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>At Trump request, Pentagon puts military police on alert to go to Minneapolis</title>
		<link>https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org/at-trump-request-pentagon-puts-military-police-on-alert-to-go-to-minneapolis/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=at-trump-request-pentagon-puts-military-police-on-alert-to-go-to-minneapolis</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Armstrong]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2020 14:16:34 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense Secretary Mark Esper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Floyd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Floyd protests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military Police (US)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Protests (George Floyd)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States (US)]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.garnertedarmstrong.org/?p=32831</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>DELRAY BEACH, Fla. — As unrest spread across dozens of American cities on Friday, the Pentagon took the rare step of ordering the Army to put several active-duty U.S. military police units on the ready to deploy to Minneapolis, where the police killing &#8230; <a class="kt-excerpt-readmore" href="https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org/at-trump-request-pentagon-puts-military-police-on-alert-to-go-to-minneapolis/" aria-label="At Trump request, Pentagon puts military police on alert to go to Minneapolis">Read More</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org/at-trump-request-pentagon-puts-military-police-on-alert-to-go-to-minneapolis/">At Trump request, Pentagon puts military police on alert to go to Minneapolis</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org">Garner Ted Armstrong Evangelistic Association</a>.</p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="speakable">DELRAY BEACH, Fla. — As unrest spread across dozens of American cities on Friday, the <a href="https://www.foxnews.com/category/politics/defense/pentagon">Pentagon</a> took the rare step of ordering the Army to put several active-duty U.S. military police units on the ready to deploy to <a href="https://www.foxnews.com/category/us/minneapolis-st-paul">Minneapolis</a>, where the police killing of <a href="https://www.foxnews.com/category/person/george-floyd">George Floyd</a> sparked the widespread protests.</p>
<p class="speakable">Soldiers from Fort Bragg in North Carolina and Fort Drum in New York have been ordered to be ready to deploy within four hours if called, according to three people with direct knowledge of the orders. Soldiers in Fort Carson, in Colorado, and Fort Riley in Kansas have been told to be ready within 24 hours. The people did not want their names used because they were not authorized to discuss the preparations.</p>
<p>The get-ready orders were sent verbally on Friday after President Donald Trump asked Defense Secretary Mark Esper for military options to help quell the unrest in Minneapolis after protests descended into looting and arson in some parts of the city.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.foxnews.com/us/twin-cities-rioting-continues-as-minnesota-governor-claims-guard-police-responding"><strong>TWIN CITIES RIOTING CONTINUES AS MINNESOTA GOVERNOR CLAIMS GUARD, POLICE RESPONDING</strong></a></p>
<p>Trump made the request on a phone call from the Oval Office on Thursday night that included Esper, National Security Adviser Robert O’ Brien, and several others. The president asked Esper for rapid deployment options if the Minneapolis protests continued to spiral out of control, according to one of the people, a senior Pentagon official who was on the call.</p>
<p><img decoding="async" src="https://a57.foxnews.com/static.foxnews.com/foxnews.com/content/uploads/2020/05/640/320/AP20133048613555.jpg?ve=1&amp;tl=1" alt="FILE - In this March 18, 2020, file photo, Defense Secretary Mark Esper speaks as President Donald Trump listens during press briefing with the coronavirus task force, at the White House in Washington. The government’s $3 trillion effort to rescue the economy from the coronavirus crisis is stirring worry at the Pentagon. Bulging federal deficits may force a reversal of years of big defense spending gains and threaten prized projects like the rebuilding of the nation’s arsenal of nuclear weapons. Esper says the sudden burst of emergency spending to prop up a stalled economy is bringing the Pentagon closer to a point where it will have to shed older weapons faster and tighten its belt. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci, File)" /><br />
FILE &#8211; In this March 18, 2020, file photo, Defense Secretary Mark Esper speaks as President Donald Trump listens during a press briefing with the coronavirus task force, at the White House in Washington. The government’s $3 trillion effort to rescue the economy from the coronavirus crisis is stirring worry at the Pentagon. Bulging federal deficits may force a reversal of years of big defense spending gains and threaten prized projects like the rebuilding of the nation’s arsenal of nuclear weapons. Esper says the sudden burst of emergency spending to prop up a stalled economy is bringing the Pentagon closer to a point where it will have to shed older weapons faster and tighten its belt. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci, File)</p>
<hr />
<p>”When the White House asks for options, someone opens the drawer and pulls them out so to speak.” the official said.</p>
<p>The person said the military units would be deployed under the Insurrection Act of 1807, which was last used in 1992 during the riots in Los Angeles that followed the Rodney King trial.</p>
<p>“If this is where the president is headed response-wise, it would represent a significant escalation and a determination that the various state and local authorities are not up to the task of responding to the growing unrest,&#8221; said Brad Moss, a Washington D.C.-based attorney, who specializes in national security.</p>
<blockquote class="pull-quote">
<p class="quote-text">“If this is where the president is headed response-wise, it would represent a significant escalation and a determination that the various state and local authorities are not up to the task of responding to the growing unrest.&#8221;</p>
<p><span class="quote-author">— Brad Moss, Washington attorney specializing in national security.</span></p></blockquote>
<p>Members of the police units were on a 30-minute recall alert early Saturday, meaning they would have to return to their bases inside that time limit in preparation for deployment to Minneapolis inside of four hours. Units at Fort Drum are slated to head to Minneapolis first, according to the three people, including two Defense Department officials. Roughly 800 U.S. soldiers would deploy to the city if called.</p>
<p>Protests erupted in Minneapolis this week after a video emerged showing a police officer kneeling on Floyd&#8217;s neck. Floyd later died of his injuries and the officer, Derek Chauvin, was arrested and charged with third-degree murder and manslaughter on Friday.</p>
<p>The protests turned violent and on Thursday rioters torched the Minneapolis Third Police Precinct near where Floyd was arrested. Mayor Jacob Frey ordered a citywide curfew at 8 p.m. local time, beginning on Friday. In that city, peaceful protests picked up steam as darkness fell, with thousands of people ignoring the curfew to walk streets in the southern part of the city. Some cars were set on fire in scattered neighborhoods, business break-ins began, and eventually there were larger fires.</p>
<p>The unrest has since spread across the country, with protests, some violent, erupting in cities including Washington DC, Atlanta, Phoenix, Denver, and Los Angelas.</p>
<p>Minnesota Governor Tim Walz ordered 500 of his National Guard troops into Minneapolis, St. Paul, and surrounding communities.</p>
<p>But a Pentagon spokesman said Walz did not ask for the Army to be deployed to his state.</p>
<p>“The Department has been in touch with the Governor and there is no request for Title 10 forces to support the Minnesota National Guard or state law enforcement,&#8221; the spokesman said, Title 10 is the U.S. law that governs the armed forces, and would authorize active duty military to operate within the U.S.</p>
<p>Alyssa Farah, the White House director of strategic communications, said the deployment of active-duty military police is untrue.</p>
<p>“False: off the record &#8211; title 10 not under discussion,” said Farah in an email response. No off-record agreement was negotiated with The Associated Press.</p>
<p>The 16th Military Police Brigade forwarded the AP&#8217;s questions to the Defense Department.</p>
<p>The three officials with direct knowledge of the potential deployment say the orders are on a classified system, known as the Secret Internet Protocol Router or SIPR for short.</p>
<p><a href="https://foxnews.onelink.me/xLDS?pid=AppArticleLink&amp;af_dp=foxnewsaf%3A%2F%2F&amp;af_web_dp=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.foxnews.com%2Fapps-products"><strong>CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP</strong></a></p>
<p>Active-duty forces are normally prohibited from acting as a domestic law enforcement agency. But the Insurrection Act offers an exception.</p>
<p>The Act would allow the military to take up a policing authority it otherwise would not be allowed to do, enforcing state and federal laws, said Stephen Vladeck, a University of Texas School of Law professor who specializes in constitutional and national security law.</p>
<p>The statute “is deliberately vague” when it comes to the instances in which the Insurrection Act could be used, he said. The state’s governor could ask President Donald Trump to take action or Trump could act on his own authority if he’s determined that the local authorities are so overwhelmed that they can’t adequately enforce the law, Vladeck said.</p>
<p>“It is a very, very broad grant of authority for the president,” he added.</p>
<hr />
<p><i>Associated Press reporters Lolita Baldor, Michael Balsamo, and Zeke Miller contributed to this story.<br />
</i></p>
<hr />
<p>Source: <a href="https://www.foxnews.com/us/at-trump-request-pentagon-puts-military-police-on-alert-to-go-to-minneapolis" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://www.foxnews.com/us/at-trump-request-pentagon-puts-military-police-on-alert-to-go-to-minneapolis</a></p>
[<a href="https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org/news/disclaimer/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Disclaimer</a>]<p>The post <a href="https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org/at-trump-request-pentagon-puts-military-police-on-alert-to-go-to-minneapolis/">At Trump request, Pentagon puts military police on alert to go to Minneapolis</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org">Garner Ted Armstrong Evangelistic Association</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
