Starmer hailed the agreement as a “landmark moment” for both countries as he hosted India’s leader at his Chequers country estate, northwest of London.

“This is not the extent or the limit of our collaboration with India,” added the British premier, whose year-old government is struggling to fire up an economy weakened by years of stagnant growth and high inflation.

“We have unique bonds of history, of family and of culture and we want to strengthen our relationship further, so that it is even more ambitious, modern and focused on the long term,” he said.

Starmer and Modi announced in May they had struck a free trade agreement that the British government says will eventually add £4.8 billion ($6.5 billion) a year to the UK economy.

Continue reading HERE

Source: https://www.france24.com/en/live-news/20250724-india-s-modi-and-uk-pm-starmer-ink-trade-deal

The post India’s Modi and UK PM Starmer ink trade deal first appeared on Garner Ted Armstrong Evangelistic Association.

LONDON – An EU-UK no-trade deal would have a big negative effect on British manufacturing, says a report Wednesday, particularly on volume car production, as it tries to recover from the slump caused by Covid-19.

The worst-case scenario would introduce delays at the UK-EU border and add costs and disrupt tightly interwoven supply chains, says the report ‘Manufacturing and Brexit’, by UK in a Changing Europe.

The report reviews evidence on the effects Brexit on the UK manufacturing sector and finds these will be disruptive and negative. The extent of disruption depends on the outcome of the UK-EU negotiations.

Few manufacturers have found any benefits from Brexit which, even if a deal is agreed, will cause significant disruption.

Manufacturers are especially worried about the UK falling out of common EU regulations. They want the UK and EU technical, safety, and other regulations to remain aligned. If they do not, then manufacturers will have to make products to different specifications for the UK and EU markets. They also want an agreement that means they do not have to carry out safety and other tests twice.

There are a big range of potential additional financial costs for companies due to tariffs, customs declarations, certification costs, audits, loss of R&D collaboration, border delays, EU customers switching to other suppliers, visa costs for EU workers, and more.

These would all add to the costs of doing business, with no discernible benefit, with some sectors particularly exposed. Nearly half of all goods imports and exports come from or go to the EU.

Many UK manufacturers have grown to depend on frictionless trade with the EU to maintain efficient supply chains. EU manufacturing workers often plug key skills gaps, such as in engineering, in the UK.

The importance of manufacturing for the UK economy far outstrips its relatively small size (10% of the UK economy). Manufacturing accounts for a disproportionate share of total exports (45%) and 65% of private-sector R&D spending.

Some services only exist because they are closely tied to manufacturing. Shocks to UK manufacturing will have a major impact on the broader UK economy.

Another big challenge for manufacturing is uncertainty around Brexit – just six months until the transition period ends, it is still unclear what will happen. The uncertainty, combined with Covid-19, is making it difficult for businesses to prepare for the post-Brexit business environment.

Industry does not know how data protection will work, whether and how they will still be able to employ EU staff for short periods of time, how state support for manufacturers will function, and so on.

This uncertainty has already contributed to falling investment in sectors such as automotive and has been cited as a factor in Nissan pulling its XTrail model from Sunderland.

The report finds a number of actions the UK government could take to mitigate the negative effects of Brexit on the manufacturing sector. They include:

• Investing much more in an industrial policy, bringing the UK in-line with other advanced economies
• Targeting specific sectors or regions
• Particular firms can be helped to take advantage of new technologies that are part of the fourth industrial revolution
• Introducing new policies on skills, R&D, financial support, wage subsidies, tax deferrals, taking equity stakes in companies
• Transferring more power to UK’s regions and devolved institutions to develop more place-based industrial policies.

Professor David Bailey, senior fellow of UK in a Changing Europe, warned particularly about no-deal: “A no trade-deal scenario is seen as the worst-case scenario for sectors like automotive given the impact of tariffs. But even a minimal Free Trade Agreement could bring disruption for manufacturers, for example via its impact on supply chains and in terms of regulatory divergence.

“Whatever the form of Brexit at the end of the transition period, manufacturing faces multiple challenges in terms of recovering from the impact of Covid-19, transforming towards carbon net-zero, and embracing Industry 4.0. A more place-based and devolved industrial policy could be one way of helping manufacturing meet such challenges.”

Source: https://www.eubusiness.com/news-eu/brexit-manufacturing.24iw

The post Brexit brings no benefits, no-deal will hit manufacturing hard: report first appeared on Garner Ted Armstrong Evangelistic Association.