<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Gallup poll - Garner Ted Armstrong Evangelistic Association</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org/tag/gallup-poll/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org</link>
	<description>Let No Man Take Your Crown</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jan 2020 13:25:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.2</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Trump, Obama share title of year&#8217;s &#8216;most admired man&#8217; in annual poll</title>
		<link>https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org/trump-obama-share-title-of-years-most-admired-man-in-annual-poll/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=trump-obama-share-title-of-years-most-admired-man-in-annual-poll</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fox News]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jan 2020 13:25:13 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donald Trump]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gallup poll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Most Admired man Gallup poll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States (US)]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.garnertedarmstrong.org/?p=30282</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>&#160;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org/trump-obama-share-title-of-years-most-admired-man-in-annual-poll/">Trump, Obama share title of year’s ‘most admired man’ in annual poll</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org">Garner Ted Armstrong Evangelistic Association</a>.</p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="entry-content-asset videofit"><iframe title="Trump, Obama share title of year&amp;apos;s &amp;apos;most admired man&amp;apos; in annual poll" width="720" height="405" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/djQaMR1q2vQ?feature=oembed" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen></iframe></div>
<p>&nbsp;</p><p>The post <a href="https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org/trump-obama-share-title-of-years-most-admired-man-in-annual-poll/">Trump, Obama share title of year’s ‘most admired man’ in annual poll</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org">Garner Ted Armstrong Evangelistic Association</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. Church Membership Down Sharply in Past Two Decades</title>
		<link>https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org/u-s-church-membership-down-sharply-in-past-two-decades/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=u-s-church-membership-down-sharply-in-past-two-decades</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeffery M. Jones]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Jun 2019 10:46:20 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Breaking News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Church membership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Decline of Religion (US)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gallup poll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States (US)]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.garnertedarmstrong.org/?p=27954</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>STORY HIGHLIGHTS Half of Americans are church members, down from 70% in 1999 Most of the decline attributable to increase in percentage with no religion Membership has fallen nine points among those who are religious WASHINGTON, D.C. &#8212; As Christian and Jewish Americans prepare to celebrate Easter and Passover, respectively, Gallup finds the percentage of...</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org/u-s-church-membership-down-sharply-in-past-two-decades/">U.S. Church Membership Down Sharply in Past Two Decades</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org">Garner Ted Armstrong Evangelistic Association</a>.</p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" class="" src="https://content.gallup.com/origin/gallupinc/GallupSpaces/Production/Cms/POLL/u6hhdfvjk0anr77c1o0bzg.jpg" alt="U.S. Church Membership Down Sharply in Past Two Decades" width="623" height="352" /></p>
<hr />
<h4>STORY HIGHLIGHTS</h4>
<ul>
<li>Half of Americans are church members, down from 70% in 1999</li>
<li>Most of the decline attributable to increase in percentage with no religion</li>
<li>Membership has fallen nine points among those who are religious<br />
<hr />
<p>WASHINGTON, D.C. &#8212; As Christian and Jewish Americans prepare to celebrate Easter and Passover, respectively, Gallup finds the percentage of Americans who report belonging to a church, synagogue or mosque at an all-time low, averaging 50% in 2018.</p>
<p>U.S. church membership was 70% or higher from 1937 through 1976, falling modestly to an average of 68% in the 1970s through the 1990s. The past 20 years have seen an acceleration in the drop-off, with a 20-percentage-point decline since 1999 and more than half of that change occurring since the start of the current decade.</p>
<p><img decoding="async" src="https://content.gallup.com/origin/gallupinc/GallupSpaces/Production/Cms/POLL/nyi9r4mrikq5unkl5g36bg.png" alt="Line graph. The percentage of U.S. adults who are members of churches fell from 70% in 1999 to 50% in 2018." /></p>
<hr />
<p>The decline in church membership is consistent with larger societal trends in <a href="https://news.gallup.com/poll/232226/church-attendance-among-catholics-resumes-downward-slide.aspx?g_source=link_newsv9&amp;g_campaign=item_248837&amp;g_medium=copy">declining church attendance</a> and <a href="https://news.gallup.com/poll/1690/Religion.aspx?g_source=link_newsv9&amp;g_campaign=item_248837&amp;g_medium=copy">an increasing proportion of Americans with no religious preference</a>.</p>
<p>This article compares church membership data for the 1998-2000 and 2016-2018 periods, using combined data from multiple years to facilitate subgroup analysis. On average, 69% of U.S. adults were members of a church in 1998-2000, compared with 52% in 2016-2018.</p>
<p>The decline in church membership mostly reflects the fact that fewer Americans than in the past now have any religious affiliation. However, even those who do identify with a particular religion are less likely to belong to a church or other place of worship than in the past.</p>
<h3><strong>Trend Toward No Religious Preference Key Factor in Declining Membership</strong></h3>
<p>Since the turn of the century, the percentage of U.S. adults with no religious affiliation has more than doubled, from 8% to 19%.</p>
<p><img decoding="async" class="" src="https://content.gallup.com/origin/gallupinc/GallupSpaces/Production/Cms/POLL/wnkiteqnouanhpgdyiid3a.png" alt="Pie graph. 19% of U.S. adults have no religious affiliation, up from 8% two decades ago." width="580" height="311" /></p>
<hr />
<p>Although some of those who do not identify with a religion nevertheless indicate that they belong to a church, the vast majority of nonreligious Americans do not. In 1998 through 2000, one in 10 Americans with no religious preference said they belonged to a church, as did an average of 7% in the past three years.</p>
<p>As such, there is an almost one-to-one correspondence between not being religious and not belonging to a church. Consequently, the 11-point increase in no religious affiliation accounts for the majority of the 17-point decline in church membership over the past two decades.</p>
<h3><strong>Fewer Religious Americans Are Church Members</strong></h3>
<p>Although there has been a steep increase in the proportion of Americans who do not have a religious attachment, they remain a small minority of the U.S. population. Three-quarters of Americans, 77%, identify with some organized religion, though that is down from 90% in 1998 through 2000.</p>
<p>The still-sizable proportion of religious Americans also contribute to declining church membership, as fewer in this group belong to a church than did so two decades ago. At the turn of the century, 73% of U.S. adults with a religious preference belonged to a church, compared with 64% today.</p>
<figure id="20190413141808" class="figure-table" contenteditable="false"><figcaption>
<div id="caption-20190416170536">Fewer Religious Americans Belong to a Church</div>
<div id="summary-20190416170536">Figures are the percentage who say they belong to a church, synagogue or mosque</div>
</figcaption><div class="table-overflow">
<table class="mobile" aria-describedby="summary-20190416170536" aria-labelledby="caption-20190416170536">
<thead>
<tr>
<td></td>
<th colspan="1" scope="col"><span class="ws-nowrap">1998-2000</span></th>
<th colspan="1" scope="col"><span class="ws-nowrap">2016-2018</span></th>
<th colspan="1" scope="col">Change</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<th colspan="1"><span class="col-unit">%</span></th>
<th colspan="1"><span class="col-unit">%</span></th>
<th colspan="1"><span class="col-unit">pct. pts.</span></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<th scope="row">Have a religious preference</th>
<td data-th="1998-2000" data-thunit="%">73</td>
<td data-th="2016-2018" data-thunit="%">64</td>
<td data-th="Change" data-thunit="pct. pts.">-9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope="row">Do not have a religious preference</th>
<td data-th="1998-2000" data-thunit="%">10</td>
<td data-th="2016-2018" data-thunit="%">7</td>
<td data-th="Change" data-thunit="pct. pts.">-3</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
<tfoot>
<tr>
<td class="note" colspan="100">Data for the small proportion of respondents who did not answer the religious preference question are not shown (approximately four in 10 of these respondents indicated they were members of a church in each time period).</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="source" colspan="100">GALLUP</td>
</tr>
</tfoot>
</table>
</div>
</figure>
<p>It is clear then, that the nature of Americans&#8217; orientation to religion is changing, with fewer religious Americans finding membership in a church or other faith institution to be a necessary part of their religious experience.</p>
<h3><strong>Generational Change Helping Push the Decline in Church Membership</strong></h3>
<p>Religiosity is strongly related to age, with older Americans far more likely than younger adults to be members of churches. However, church membership has dropped among all generational groups over the past two decades, with declines of roughly 10 percentage points among traditionalists, baby boomers and Generation X.</p>
<p>Most millennials were too young to be polled in 1998-2000. Now that they have reached adulthood, their church membership rates are exceedingly low and appear to be a major factor in the drop in overall U.S. church membership. Just 42% of millennials are members of churches, on average.</p>
<figure id="20190413155005" class="figure-table" contenteditable="false"><figcaption>
<div id="caption-20190416170732">Changes in Church Membership by Generation, Over Time</div>
</figcaption><div class="table-overflow">
<table class="mobile" aria-labelledby="caption-20190416170732">
<thead>
<tr>
<td></td>
<th colspan="1" scope="col"><span class="ws-nowrap">1998-2000</span></th>
<th colspan="1" scope="col"><span class="ws-nowrap">2016-2018</span></th>
<th colspan="1" scope="col">Change</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<th colspan="1"><span class="col-unit">%</span></th>
<th colspan="1"><span class="col-unit">%</span></th>
<th colspan="1"><span class="col-unit">pct. pts.</span></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<th scope="row">Traditionalists (born in 1945 or before)</th>
<td data-th="1998-2000" data-thunit="%">77</td>
<td data-th="2016-2018" data-thunit="%">68</td>
<td data-th="Change" data-thunit="pct. pts.">-9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope="row">Baby boomers (born 1946-1964)</th>
<td data-th="1998-2000" data-thunit="%">67</td>
<td data-th="2016-2018" data-thunit="%">57</td>
<td data-th="Change" data-thunit="pct. pts.">-10</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope="row">Generation X (born 1965-1979)</th>
<td data-th="1998-2000" data-thunit="%">62</td>
<td data-th="2016-2018" data-thunit="%">54</td>
<td data-th="Change" data-thunit="pct. pts.">-8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope="row">Millennials (born 1980-2000)</th>
<td data-th="1998-2000" data-thunit="%">n/a</td>
<td data-th="2016-2018" data-thunit="%">42</td>
<td data-th="Change" data-thunit="pct. pts.">n/a</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
<tfoot>
<tr>
<td class="note" colspan="100">Note: Given that Gallup&#8217;s polls are based on the 18+ U.S. adult population, the 1998-2000 time period would have included only a small proportion of the millennial generation.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="source" colspan="100">GALLUP</td>
</tr>
</tfoot>
</table>
</div>
</figure>
<p>By comparison, 20 years ago, 62% of members of Generation X belonged to a church, when they were about the same age as millennials are today.</p>
<p>The low rates of church membership among millennials conform with the generation&#8217;s weaker attachment to religion in general. On average, 68% of millennials identify with a religion in the 2016-2018 church membership surveys, while 29% do not. In all other generations, at least 79% have a religious affiliation, with correspondingly lower percentages expressing no faith preference.</p>
<p><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="" src="https://content.gallup.com/origin/gallupinc/GallupSpaces/Production/Cms/POLL/ovxdts2eskgsmxrobnyg7a.png" alt="Bar graph. 29% of millennials have no religious affiliation, more than any other generation." width="597" height="320" /></p>
<p>The percentage of millennials with no religion may be continuing to grow, as an average of 33% in Gallup surveys conducted in 2019 to date say they have no religious affiliation.</p>
<p>Not only are millennials less likely than older Americans to identify with a religion, but millennials who are religious are significantly less likely to belong to a church. Fifty-seven percent of religious millennials belong to a church, compared with 65% or more in older generations.</p>
<p><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="" src="https://content.gallup.com/origin/gallupinc/GallupSpaces/Production/Cms/POLL/qnmgz6ojlkyuzhkvid79eq.png" alt="Bar graph. 57% of religious millennials belong to a church, a lower proportion than in older generations." width="586" height="314" /></p>
<p>The lower rate of church membership among religious millennials appears to be more a product of generational differences than of life-stage effects. In 1998-2000, 68% of Generation X respondents were church members when they were roughly the same age as today&#8217;s millennials.</p>
<p>Given that church membership, and religiosity in general, is greater among older adults, the emergence of an increasingly secular generation to replace far more religious older generations suggests the decline in U.S. church membership overall will continue.</p>
<h3><strong>Membership Decline Steeper Among Catholics</strong></h3>
<p>Gallup has previously reported that <a href="https://news.gallup.com/poll/232226/church-attendance-among-catholics-resumes-downward-slide.aspx?g_source=link_newsv9&amp;g_campaign=item_248837&amp;g_medium=copy">church attendance has dropped more among Catholics</a> than among Protestants. Consistent with this, the decline in church membership has been greater among Catholics. Twenty years ago, 76% of Catholics belonged to a church; now, 63% do.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, 67% of Protestants, down from 73% in 1998-2000, are members of a church. Much of the decline in Protestant membership is attributable to the increasing percentage of Americans who simply identify their religion as &#8220;Christian&#8221; rather than as a specific Protestant denomination such as Baptist, Lutheran or Methodist. Gallup classifies &#8220;Christian&#8221; respondents as Protestants but, as might be expected, nondenominational Christians are less likely to belong to a church (57%) than Americans who identify with a specific Protestant denomination (70%).</p>
<p>There are insufficient cases to provide reliable estimates on church membership among other religions, but the data suggest that membership in a place of worship has been stable among Mormons (near 90% in both time periods) and Jews (in the mid- to low 50% range in both time periods) over the past two decades.</p>
<p>In contrast to the variable changes in church membership among generational and faith subgroups, the declines have been fairly similar among most other demographic subgroups. However, the rates have differed by party identification, as Republicans show a relatively modest decline in church membership of eight points since 1998-2000 (from 77% to 69%). In contrast, Democrats show one of the largest subgroup declines, of 23 points, from 71% to 48%.</p>
<p>Full data for subgroups are shown in a table at the bottom of the article.</p>
<h3><strong>Implications</strong></h3>
<p>Although the United States is one of <a href="https://news.gallup.com/poll/142727/Religiosity-Highest-World-Poorest-Nations.aspx?g_source=link_NEWSV9&amp;g_medium=TOPIC&amp;g_campaign=item_&amp;g_content=Religiosity%2520Highest%2520in%2520World%27s%2520Poorest%2520Nations">the more religious countries, particularly among Western nations</a>, it is far less religious than it used to be. Barely three-quarters of Americans now identify with a religion and only about half claim membership in a church, synagogue or mosque.</p>
<p>The rate of U.S. church membership has declined sharply in the past two decades after being relatively stable in the six decades before that. A sharp increase in the proportion of the population with no religious affiliation, a decline in church membership among those who do have a religious preference, and low levels of church membership among millennials are all contributing to the accelerating trend.</p>
<p>The challenge is clear for churches, which depend on loyal and active members to keep them open and thriving. How do they find ways to convince some of the unaffiliated religious adults in society to make a commitment to a particular house of worship of their chosen faith? Roughly one in four U.S. adults are religious but not members of a church, synagogue or mosque.</p>
<p>Church leaders must also grapple with the generational slide away from religion. Millennials are much less likely than their elders to indicate a religious preference, and presumably the nearly one-third of millennials without a religious preference are unlikely to ever join a church. But the roughly two-thirds of millennials who do express a religious preference may one day be convinced to join, perhaps as more get established in their lives, including having families, which can be an impetus to becoming a part of a faith community.</p>
<p>Another obstacle churches face is Americans&#8217; <a href="https://news.gallup.com/poll/236243/military-small-business-police-stir-confidence.aspx?g_source=link_newsv9&amp;g_campaign=item_248837&amp;g_medium=copy">eroding confidence in the institution of organized religion</a>. While organized religion is not the only U.S. institution suffering a loss of confidence, Americans have lost more confidence in it than in most other institutions.</p>
<p>In addition to the ongoing trends toward declining religiosity, Americans who are religious may also be changing their relationship to churches. They may not see a need to, or have a desire to, belong to a church and participate in a community of people with similar religious beliefs.</p>
<p>These trends are not just numbers, but play out in the reality that thousands of U.S. churches are closing each year. Religious Americans in the future will likely be faced with fewer options for places of worship, and likely less convenient ones, which could accelerate the decline in membership even more.</p>
<p><em>Learn more about how the <a href="http://www.gallup.com/201200/gallup-poll-social-series-work.aspx?utm_source=link_newsv9&amp;utm_campaign=item_248837&amp;utm_medium=copy">Gallup Poll Social Series</a> works.<br />
</em></p>
<div class="article-content">
<figure id="20190413163625" class="figure-table" contenteditable="false"><figcaption>
<div id="caption-20190418095413">Changes in Church Membership, by Subgroup</div>
</figcaption><div class="table-overflow">
<table class="mobile" aria-labelledby="caption-20190418095413">
<thead>
<tr>
<td></td>
<th colspan="1" scope="col"><span class="ws-nowrap">1998-2000</span></th>
<th colspan="1" scope="col"><span class="ws-nowrap">2016-2018</span></th>
<th colspan="1" scope="col">Change</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<th colspan="1"><span class="col-unit">%</span></th>
<th colspan="1"><span class="col-unit">%</span></th>
<th colspan="1"><span class="col-unit">pct. pts.</span></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<th scope="row">U.S. adults</th>
<td data-th="1998-2000" data-thunit="%">69</td>
<td data-th="2016-2018" data-thunit="%">52</td>
<td data-th="Change" data-thunit="pct. pts.">-17</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
<tbody class="row-group">
<tr>
<th scope="rowgroup">Religion</th>
<td colspan="100"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope="row">Catholic</th>
<td data-th="1998-2000" data-thunit="%">76</td>
<td data-th="2016-2018" data-thunit="%">63</td>
<td data-th="Change" data-thunit="pct. pts.">-13</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope="row">Protestant ^</th>
<td data-th="1998-2000" data-thunit="%">73</td>
<td data-th="2016-2018" data-thunit="%">67</td>
<td data-th="Change" data-thunit="pct. pts.">-6</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
<tbody class="row-group">
<tr>
<th scope="rowgroup">Gender</th>
<td colspan="100"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope="row">Men</th>
<td data-th="1998-2000" data-thunit="%">64</td>
<td data-th="2016-2018" data-thunit="%">47</td>
<td data-th="Change" data-thunit="pct. pts.">-17</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope="row">Women</th>
<td data-th="1998-2000" data-thunit="%">73</td>
<td data-th="2016-2018" data-thunit="%">58</td>
<td data-th="Change" data-thunit="pct. pts.">-15</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
<tbody class="row-group">
<tr>
<th scope="rowgroup">Age</th>
<td colspan="100"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope="row">18-29 years old</th>
<td data-th="1998-2000" data-thunit="%">63</td>
<td data-th="2016-2018" data-thunit="%">41</td>
<td data-th="Change" data-thunit="pct. pts.">-22</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope="row">30-49 years old</th>
<td data-th="1998-2000" data-thunit="%">65</td>
<td data-th="2016-2018" data-thunit="%">49</td>
<td data-th="Change" data-thunit="pct. pts.">-16</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope="row">50-64 years old</th>
<td data-th="1998-2000" data-thunit="%">71</td>
<td data-th="2016-2018" data-thunit="%">56</td>
<td data-th="Change" data-thunit="pct. pts.">-15</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope="row">65+ years old</th>
<td data-th="1998-2000" data-thunit="%">79</td>
<td data-th="2016-2018" data-thunit="%">64</td>
<td data-th="Change" data-thunit="pct. pts.">-15</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
<tbody class="row-group">
<tr>
<th scope="rowgroup">Race/Ethnicity</th>
<td colspan="100"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope="row">Non-Hispanic white</th>
<td data-th="1998-2000" data-thunit="%">68</td>
<td data-th="2016-2018" data-thunit="%">53</td>
<td data-th="Change" data-thunit="pct. pts.">-15</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope="row">Non-Hispanic black</th>
<td data-th="1998-2000" data-thunit="%">78</td>
<td data-th="2016-2018" data-thunit="%">65</td>
<td data-th="Change" data-thunit="pct. pts.">-13</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope="row">Hispanic</th>
<td data-th="1998-2000" data-thunit="%">68</td>
<td data-th="2016-2018" data-thunit="%">45</td>
<td data-th="Change" data-thunit="pct. pts.">-23</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
<tbody class="row-group">
<tr>
<th scope="rowgroup">Region</th>
<td colspan="100"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope="row">East</th>
<td data-th="1998-2000" data-thunit="%">69</td>
<td data-th="2016-2018" data-thunit="%">50</td>
<td data-th="Change" data-thunit="pct. pts.">-19</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope="row">Midwest</th>
<td data-th="1998-2000" data-thunit="%">72</td>
<td data-th="2016-2018" data-thunit="%">56</td>
<td data-th="Change" data-thunit="pct. pts.">-16</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope="row">South</th>
<td data-th="1998-2000" data-thunit="%">74</td>
<td data-th="2016-2018" data-thunit="%">58</td>
<td data-th="Change" data-thunit="pct. pts.">-16</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope="row">West</th>
<td data-th="1998-2000" data-thunit="%">57</td>
<td data-th="2016-2018" data-thunit="%">43</td>
<td data-th="Change" data-thunit="pct. pts.">-14</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
<tbody class="row-group">
<tr>
<th scope="rowgroup">Education</th>
<td colspan="100"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope="row">College graduate</th>
<td data-th="1998-2000" data-thunit="%">68</td>
<td data-th="2016-2018" data-thunit="%">55</td>
<td data-th="Change" data-thunit="pct. pts.">-13</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope="row">College nongraduate</th>
<td data-th="1998-2000" data-thunit="%">69</td>
<td data-th="2016-2018" data-thunit="%">51</td>
<td data-th="Change" data-thunit="pct. pts.">-18</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
<tbody class="row-group">
<tr>
<th scope="rowgroup">Party ID</th>
<td colspan="100"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope="row">Republican</th>
<td data-th="1998-2000" data-thunit="%">77</td>
<td data-th="2016-2018" data-thunit="%">69</td>
<td data-th="Change" data-thunit="pct. pts.">-8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope="row">Independent</th>
<td data-th="1998-2000" data-thunit="%">59</td>
<td data-th="2016-2018" data-thunit="%">45</td>
<td data-th="Change" data-thunit="pct. pts.">-14</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope="row">Democrat</th>
<td data-th="1998-2000" data-thunit="%">71</td>
<td data-th="2016-2018" data-thunit="%">48</td>
<td data-th="Change" data-thunit="pct. pts.">-23</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
<tbody class="row-group">
<tr>
<th scope="rowgroup">Ideology</th>
<td colspan="100"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope="row">Conservative</th>
<td data-th="1998-2000" data-thunit="%">78</td>
<td data-th="2016-2018" data-thunit="%">67</td>
<td data-th="Change" data-thunit="pct. pts.">-11</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope="row">Moderate</th>
<td data-th="1998-2000" data-thunit="%">66</td>
<td data-th="2016-2018" data-thunit="%">48</td>
<td data-th="Change" data-thunit="pct. pts.">-18</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope="row">Liberal</th>
<td data-th="1998-2000" data-thunit="%">56</td>
<td data-th="2016-2018" data-thunit="%">37</td>
<td data-th="Change" data-thunit="pct. pts.">-19</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
<tbody class="row-group">
<tr>
<th scope="rowgroup">Marital status</th>
<td colspan="100"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope="row">Married</th>
<td data-th="1998-2000" data-thunit="%">71</td>
<td data-th="2016-2018" data-thunit="%">59</td>
<td data-th="Change" data-thunit="pct. pts.">-12</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope="row">Not married</th>
<td data-th="1998-2000" data-thunit="%">64</td>
<td data-th="2016-2018" data-thunit="%">45</td>
<td data-th="Change" data-thunit="pct. pts.">-19</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
<tfoot>
<tr>
<td class="note" colspan="100">^ Protestants include those who identify their religion as &#8220;Christian.&#8221;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="source" colspan="100">GALLUP</td>
</tr>
</tfoot>
</table>
</div>
</figure>
<hr />
</div>
<section class="section--default section-default section-rel--methodology" role="complementary">
<div class="c-methodology">
<div class="c-methodology__title">
<p>Source: <a href="https://news.gallup.com/poll/248837/church-membership-down-sharply-past-two-decades.aspx" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://news.gallup.com/poll/248837/church-membership-down-sharply-past-two-decades.aspx</a></p>
[<a href="https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org/news/disclaimer/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Disclaimer</a>]
</div>
</div>
</section>
<p>&nbsp;</li>
</ul><p>The post <a href="https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org/u-s-church-membership-down-sharply-in-past-two-decades/">U.S. Church Membership Down Sharply in Past Two Decades</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org">Garner Ted Armstrong Evangelistic Association</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>America is waking up to the critical threat that is Russia</title>
		<link>https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org/america-is-waking-up-to-the-critical-threat-that-is-russia/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=america-is-waking-up-to-the-critical-threat-that-is-russia</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Rogan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2019 16:53:40 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donald Trump]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gallup poll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mohammed bin Salman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NATO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russian military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States (US)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US-Russia relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vladimir Putin]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.garnertedarmstrong.org/?p=26330</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A new Gallup poll released this week suggests that 52 percent of Americans regard the Russian military as a critical threat to U.S. interests. Those respondents are correct. A plurality of Americans, 32 percent, view Russia as our &#8220;greatest enemy today,&#8221; a stark difference from 19 percent last year, when a slight majority of Americans said North Korea...</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org/america-is-waking-up-to-the-critical-threat-that-is-russia/">America is waking up to the critical threat that is Russia</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org">Garner Ted Armstrong Evangelistic Association</a>.</p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="ArticlePage-articleBody-firstLetter">A</span> new Gallup <a href="https://news.gallup.com/poll/247100/majority-americans-consider-russia-critical-threat.aspx" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" data-cms-ai="0">poll</a> released this week suggests that 52 percent of Americans regard the Russian military as a critical threat to U.S. interests. Those respondents are correct. A plurality of Americans, 32 percent, view Russia as our &#8220;greatest enemy today,&#8221; a stark difference from 19 percent last year, when a slight majority of Americans said North Korea was our greatest enemy.</p>
<p>Still, I respect the arguments of those who say Russia isn&#8217;t a critical threat. Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky. for example, believes Russian-U.S. relations would be greatly improved were the U.S. respectful of Russia&#8217;s near-border interests. While <a href="https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/rand-paul-on-russia-vs-rand-paul-on-saudi-arabia" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" data-cms-ai="0">I disagree</a> with Paul, his argument does match Russia&#8217;s own claims. It&#8217;s also true that the Russian armed forces are not, at least in parity to the U.S., what they were during the mid-period of the Cold War. Extending this point, Daniel DePetris <a href="https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/russia-is-weak-contrary-to-popular-belief" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" data-cms-ai="0">suggests</a> that Russia&#8217;s smaller economy, lower military expenditure, and localized interests mean it poses no critical threat to the west.</p>
<p>But those who believe Russia is a critical threat are ultimately correct. The nature of Vladimir Putin&#8217;s threat is measured not by economics or military spending, but rather by its intent and action. On those counts, Russia has shown impressive ability to challenge American global influence, and threaten U.S. security interests.</p>
<p>When it comes to global influence, Putin has cultivated an impressive <a href="https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/trumps-india-challenge-be-a-better-friend-than-russia" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" data-cms-ai="0">mercantile relationship</a> with India. He <a href="https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/anger-control-russia-three-reasons-why-the-saudi-crown-prince-fired-his-foreign-minister" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" data-cms-ai="0">has drawn</a> Saudi Arabia&#8217;s Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman towards Moscow (although President Trump&#8217;s retention of <a href="https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/russia-iran-and-bashar-assad-will-go-crazy-over-trumps-syria-peacekeeping-force" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" data-cms-ai="0">some military</a> forces in Syria will draw the Saudis back to Washington&#8217;s corner). Putin has forged <a href="https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/it-sounds-odd-but-you-should-welcome-the-chinese-russian-war-games" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" data-cms-ai="0">closer relations</a> with China. At the United Nations, Russia has successfully obstructed U.S. policy interests on Syria, Ukraine, and Venezuela.</p>
<p>Russia has also successfully used coercive power to pose a critical threat to America. Russia&#8217;s military now possesses maneuver warfare capabilities <a href="https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/nato-should-select-jim-mattis-as-its-next-secretary-general" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" data-cms-ai="0">to challenge</a> NATO in Europe. Russian intelligence officers wage campaigns of <a href="https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/an-inside-look-on-why-putin-is-lying-about-the-novichok-gru-officers" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" data-cms-ai="0">global assassination</a> and intimidation. As we&#8217;ve seen in numerous elections around the western world, Russian cyberoffensive capabilities are formidable, varied, and aggressive.</p>
<p>Yet what draws all these threats together is their strategic motivation: Putin&#8217;s desire to degrade the U.S.-led international order, subjugate democracies in eastern and central Europe, and destabilize western civil societies.</p>
<p>In short, while the Gallup respondents are wrong to identify Russia as America&#8217;s greatest adversary ( <a href="http://www.tomroganthinks.com/2014/10/china.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" data-cms-ai="0">that&#8217;s China</a>), they are right to identify Russia as a critical threat.</p>
<hr />
<p>Source: <a href="https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/america-is-waking-up-to-the-critical-threat-that-is-russia" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/america-is-waking-up-to-the-critical-threat-that-is-russia</a></p>
[<a href="https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org/news/disclaimer/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Disclaimer</a>]<p>The post <a href="https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org/america-is-waking-up-to-the-critical-threat-that-is-russia/">America is waking up to the critical threat that is Russia</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org">Garner Ted Armstrong Evangelistic Association</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Democrats have a more positive view of socialism than capitalism, poll finds</title>
		<link>https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org/democrats-have-a-more-positive-view-of-socialism-than-capitalism-poll-finds/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=democrats-have-a-more-positive-view-of-socialism-than-capitalism-poll-finds</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[William Cummings - USA Today]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2018 08:52:40 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capitalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donald Trump]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gallup poll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Socialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Socialism vs. Capitalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States (US)]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.garnertedarmstrong.org/?p=6870</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON – Capitalism, Democrats just aren&#8217;t that into you. According to a Gallup poll published Monday, a majority of Democrats no longer hold a positive view of capitalism, while nearly 60 percent of them feel good about socialism. More than 70 percent of Republicans, on the other hand, see capitalism positively, while only 16 percent of them...</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org/democrats-have-a-more-positive-view-of-socialism-than-capitalism-poll-finds/">Democrats have a more positive view of socialism than capitalism, poll finds</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org">Garner Ted Armstrong Evangelistic Association</a>.</p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="speakable-p-1 p-text">WASHINGTON – Capitalism, Democrats just aren&#8217;t that into you.</p>
<p class="speakable-p-2 p-text">According to a <a href="https://news.gallup.com/poll/240725/democrats-positive-socialism-capitalism.aspx" data-track-label="inline|intext|n/a">Gallup poll published Monday</a>, a majority of Democrats no longer hold a positive view of capitalism, while nearly 60 percent of them feel good about socialism. More than 70 percent of Republicans, on the other hand, see capitalism positively, while only 16 percent of them have a positive view of socialism.</p>
<p class="p-text">The positive view of socialism among Democrats, and those who lean Democrat, actually dropped a point from 58 percent in 2016. But in those same two years, positive feelings about capitalism plummetted from 56 to 47 percent.</p>
<p class="p-text">Faith in the invisible hand of the market weakened most among young Americans. While 57 percent of those between ages 18 and 29 viewed capitalism positively in 2016, only 45 percent felt the same way in 2018.</p>
<p class="p-text">Gallup&#8217;s results reflect what many analysts and pundits have identified as a <a href="https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2018/07/12/moderate-democrats-push-back-against-wild-eyed-leftward-lurch-party/777600002/" data-track-label="inline|intext|n/a">shift toward socialism</a> within the Democratic Party. The success of self-identified socialist Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., in the 2016 Democratic presidential primary, and the<a href="https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2018/06/27/joe-crowley-alexandria-ocasio-cortez-primary-5-takeaways/738504002/" data-track-label="inline|intext|n/a"> upset victory of Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez</a> – a member of the Democratic Socialists of America – over incumbent Rep. Joe Crowley, R-N.Y., are often cited as evidence of that shift.</p>
<p class="p-text"><span class="exclude-from-newsgate px-seo-warning-highlight"><strong>Our view: </strong><a href="https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2018/07/19/trump-republicans-can-count-democrats-lose-midterm-elections-editorials-debates/797090002/" data-track-label="inline|intext|n/a">Trump and Republicans can count on Democrats in midterm elections</a></span></p>
<p class="p-text"><span class="exclude-from-newsgate px-seo-warning-highlight"><strong>More: </strong><a href="https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2018/01/10/students-more-liberal-but-its-not-because-their-professors-james-piereson-naomi-riley-column/1012622001/" data-track-label="inline|intext|n/a">Today&#8217;s kids love socialism — but it&#8217;s not because of their radical professors</a></span></p>
<p class="p-text">&#8220;It&#8217;s possible that the drop in Democrats&#8217; positive views of capitalism is related to Donald Trump&#8217;s presidency,&#8221; said Gallup&#8217;s Editor-in-Chief Frank Newport. &#8220;Trump is an enthusiastic capitalist, and his administration&#8217;s efforts to roll back regulations on business and industry, as well as the tax cut law that is advantageous to businesses and corporations, may have caused Democrats to view the entire capitalist enterprise with less positive eyes.&#8221;</p>
<div id="ad-position-69" class="partner-placement partner-spike" data-monetization-id="native-article_link" data-monetization-sizes="fluid,3,3">
<div id="ad-slot-7103-usatoday-native-article_link-news-politics-features_onpolitics-71" class="ad-slot"></div>
</div>
<p class="p-text">But Newport also said the talk of a Democratic shift toward socialism has been overstated and that aside from Ocasio-Cortez, most socialist candidates lost in this year&#8217;s Democratic primaries.</p>
<p class="p-text">A majority (56 percent) of Americans still have a positive view of capitalism. What&#8217;s more, 92 percent of Americans have a positive view of small businesses, 86 percent have a positive view of entrepreneurs, 79 percent have a positive view of free enterprise and 53 percent have a positive view of &#8220;big business.&#8221;</p>
<p class="p-text">Overall, only 37 percent of Americans have a positive view of socialism.</p>
<p class="p-text">The poll was conducted from July 30 to Aug. 5, 2018, among a random sample of 1,505 adults. Gallup said the margin of error was three plus or minus three percent. The poll did not define either socialism or capitalism for the respondents.</p>
<hr />
<p class="p-text">Source: <a href="https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/onpolitics/2018/08/14/democrats-prefer-socialism-capitalism-gallup-poll/988558002/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/onpolitics/2018/08/14/democrats-prefer-socialism-capitalism-gallup-poll/988558002/</a></p>
[<a href="https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org/news/disclaimer/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Disclaimer</a>]<p>The post <a href="https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org/democrats-have-a-more-positive-view-of-socialism-than-capitalism-poll-finds/">Democrats have a more positive view of socialism than capitalism, poll finds</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org">Garner Ted Armstrong Evangelistic Association</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
