<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Lürssen - Garner Ted Armstrong Evangelistic Association</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org/tag/lurssen/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org</link>
	<description>Let No Man Take Your Crown</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2018 04:47:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	

 
	<item>
		<title>Shipbuilders split on German-ness of new combat ship</title>
		<link>https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org/shipbuilders-split-on-german-ness-of-new-combat-ship/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=shipbuilders-split-on-german-ness-of-new-combat-ship</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sebastian Sprenger ]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2018 04:36:22 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blohm+Voss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Combat ships (Germany)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lürssen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ministry of Defence (Germany)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ThyssenKrupp Marine Systems]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.garnertedarmstrong.org/?p=4486</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A German flag on a minesweeper of the German Navy blows in the wind as the ship stands in port Nov. 9, 2006, in Kiel, Germany. (Sean Gallup/Getty Images) COLOGNE, Germany — Germany’s planned acquisition of a new frigate-like warship &#8230; <a class="kt-excerpt-readmore" href="https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org/shipbuilders-split-on-german-ness-of-new-combat-ship/" aria-label="Shipbuilders split on German-ness of new combat ship">Read More</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org/shipbuilders-split-on-german-ness-of-new-combat-ship/">Shipbuilders split on German-ness of new combat ship</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org">Garner Ted Armstrong Evangelistic Association</a>.</p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img decoding="async" class="image-lazy" src="https://www.armytimes.com/resizer/L6gQYabxPKo5Yg4nw2YHH81QfN0=/1200x0/filters:quality(100)/arc-anglerfish-arc2-prod-mco.s3.amazonaws.com/public/VVQ6RD22XNEFZCXVMNPKQLOSPM.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<p class="caption credit ">A German flag on a minesweeper of the German Navy blows in the wind as the ship stands in port Nov. 9, 2006, in Kiel, Germany. (Sean Gallup/Getty Images)</p>
<div class="row">
<div class="col-md-12 col-xs-12 col-print-12">
<p class="element element-paragraph">COLOGNE, Germany — Germany’s planned acquisition of a new frigate-like warship has triggered <a class="" title="" href="https://www.defensenews.com/global/europe/2018/03/05/boom-or-bust-german-industry-sizes-up-euro-defense-potential/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">an industry debate</a> that goes something like this: Will the vessels be German enough?</p>
</div>
</div>
<div class="row">
<div class="col-md-12 col-xs-12 col-print-12">
<p class="element element-paragraph">That is the question being raised by a consortium of the German companies ThyssenKrupp Marine Systems and Lürssen, whose executives were told by the government this month that their joint offering had been eliminated from the race to the build the Mehrzweckkampfschiff 180.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div class="row">
<div class="col-md-12 col-xs-12 col-print-12">
<p class="element element-paragraph">Competing bidders include a Dutch-German team consisting of Damen and Blohm+Voss, and German Naval Yards, which belongs to a Lebanese investor. Bremen-based Lürssen, which bought Blohm+Voss in 2016, could keep its chance at the deal in case the Dutch-German offering wins.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div class="row">
<div class="col-md-12 col-xs-12 col-print-12">
<p class="element element-paragraph">With TKMS out, critics fear Germany would cede ground to foreign players in a critical field, despite a pledge in the coalition government pact, finalized this week, to treat surface shipbuilding as a “key technology.”</p>
</div>
</div>
<div class="pb-ad-container">The Ministry of Defence is not buying that argument. A spokesman described such thinking as “protectionism” that would violate source-selection rules.</div>
<div class="row">
<div class="col-md-12 col-xs-12 col-print-12">
<p class="element element-paragraph">In today’s global market, the government would be hard-pressed to keep constant tabs on the international dealings of all of its suppliers, the spokesman argued.</p>
<div class="row">
<div class="col-md-12 col-xs-12 col-print-12">
<p class="element element-paragraph">While the ministry has not said why TMKS was kicked out of the program, local media reports said cost played a role. The consortium’s offer was for more than the €3.5 billion (U.S. $4.3 billion) set aside in the budget, according to the Hamburger Abendblatt. The money would buy four ships.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div class="row">
<div class="col-md-12 col-xs-12 col-print-12">
<p class="element element-paragraph">Additionally, perceived deficiencies in the proposed risk-management plan for the complex program led to the TKMS-Lürssen exclusion, sources told Defense News.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div class="row">
<div class="col-md-12 col-xs-12 col-print-12">
<p class="element element-paragraph">The company stands by its offer, which entailed “decades of experience and expertise in naval shipbuilding and as a partner of the German navy,” a TKMS spokesman wrote in an email.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div class="row">
<div class="col-md-12 col-xs-12 col-print-12">
<p class="element element-paragraph">Meanwhile, Hamburg-based Blohm+Voss this week lobbied lawmakers in favor of the Damen-led consortium. While the Dutch firm would lead the design work, the ships would be built in Hamburg and secure jobs there, executives from both yards said in a letter to lawmakers, the Hamburger Abendblatt reported.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div class="row">
<div class="col-md-12 col-xs-12 col-print-12">
<p class="element element-paragraph">As for the government’s pledge to strengthen “key technologies,” surface ships are indeed mentioned in the coalition agreement, but the term appears in a section devoted to the civilian economy, analysts note.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div class="row">
<div class="col-md-12 col-xs-12 col-print-12">
<p class="element element-paragraph">Defence Ministry officials declared submarine capabilities to be a key field in a 2015 study on the German defense industrial base, leaving the option of buying surface ships from European or global producers.</p>
<hr />
<p class="element element-paragraph">Source: <a href="https://www.defensenews.com/naval/2018/03/15/shipbuilders-split-on-german-ness-of-new-combat-ship/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">https://www.defensenews.com/naval/2018/03/15/shipbuilders-split-on-german-ness-of-new-combat-ship/</a></p>
[<a href="https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org/news/disclaimer/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Disclaimer</a>]
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p>&nbsp;</p><p>The post <a href="https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org/shipbuilders-split-on-german-ness-of-new-combat-ship/">Shipbuilders split on German-ness of new combat ship</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org">Garner Ted Armstrong Evangelistic Association</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
