<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Quid Pro Quo - Garner Ted Armstrong Evangelistic Association</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org/tag/quid-pro-quo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org</link>
	<description>Let No Man Take Your Crown</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Nov 2019 03:36:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>WATCH: Rep. Elise Stefanik’s full questioning of Gordon Sondland &#124; Trump impeachment hearings</title>
		<link>https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org/watch-rep-elise-stefaniks-full-questioning-of-gordon-sondland-trump-impeachment-hearings/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=watch-rep-elise-stefaniks-full-questioning-of-gordon-sondland-trump-impeachment-hearings</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PBS NewsHour]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Nov 2019 03:26:38 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donald Trump]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elise Stefanik]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gordon Sondland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hunter Biden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Impeachment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Impeachment inquiry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quid Pro Quo]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.garnertedarmstrong.org/?p=29864</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>&#160;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org/watch-rep-elise-stefaniks-full-questioning-of-gordon-sondland-trump-impeachment-hearings/">WATCH: Rep. Elise Stefanik’s full questioning of Gordon Sondland | Trump impeachment hearings</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org">Garner Ted Armstrong Evangelistic Association</a>.</p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="entry-content-asset videofit"><iframe title="WATCH: Rep. Elise Stefanik’s full questioning of Gordon Sondland | Trump&amp;apos;s first impeachment" width="720" height="405" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/6Zn5a8s4KiA?feature=oembed" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen></iframe></div>
<p>&nbsp;</p><p>The post <a href="https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org/watch-rep-elise-stefaniks-full-questioning-of-gordon-sondland-trump-impeachment-hearings/">WATCH: Rep. Elise Stefanik’s full questioning of Gordon Sondland | Trump impeachment hearings</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org">Garner Ted Armstrong Evangelistic Association</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>House Dem now sees no &#8216;value&#8217; in impeachment, as polls show falling support among independents</title>
		<link>https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org/house-dem-now-sees-no-value-in-impeachment-as-polls-show-falling-support-among-independents/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=house-dem-now-sees-no-value-in-impeachment-as-polls-show-falling-support-among-independents</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gregg Re | Fox News]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Nov 2019 14:15:50 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adam Schiff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donald Trump]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House Resolution 660]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Impeachment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Impeachment inquiry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judiciary Committee (US-House)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Presidential election 2020 (US)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quid Pro Quo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States (US)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US House of Representives]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.garnertedarmstrong.org/?p=29831</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Michigan Democratic Rep. Brenda Lawrence, a prominent supporter of Kamala Harris who has previously supported the impeachment inquiry into President Trump, abruptly announced Sunday that she no longer saw any &#8220;value&#8221; in the process and called for her fellow Democrats to throw their support behind a symbolic censure resolution. Lawrence&#8217;s about-face came as polls have shown that independents are souring on the...</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org/house-dem-now-sees-no-value-in-impeachment-as-polls-show-falling-support-among-independents/">House Dem now sees no ‘value’ in impeachment, as polls show falling support among independents</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org">Garner Ted Armstrong Evangelistic Association</a>.</p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="speakable">Michigan Democratic Rep. Brenda Lawrence, a prominent supporter of Kamala Harris who has previously supported the impeachment inquiry into <a href="https://www.foxnews.com/media/democrat-abandon-impeachment-president-trump">President Trump</a>, abruptly announced Sunday that she no longer saw any &#8220;value&#8221; in the process and called for her fellow Democrats to throw their support behind a symbolic censure resolution.</p>
<p class="speakable">Lawrence&#8217;s about-face came as <a href="https://www.foxnews.com/politics/independents-impeachment-polls" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">polls have shown</a> that independents are souring on the idea of impeaching and removing Trump from office, including in <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/a-snapshot-from-wisconsin-highlights-democrats-challenges-on-impeachment/2019/11/23/22cc56c6-0e04-11ea-bd9d-c628fd48b3a0_story.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">critical battleground states </a>like Wisconsin, even as House Democrats aggressively presented their <a href="https://www.foxnews.com/politics/dems-shift-rhetoric-from-quid-pro-quo-to-bribery-after-impeachment-focus-groups" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">poll-tested</a> &#8220;bribery&#8221; case against the president over the past two weeks.</p>
<p>&#8220;We are so close to an election,&#8221; Lawrence <a href="https://www.nobsnewshour.com/no-bs-news-hour-november-24th-2019/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">said Sunday on a Michigan radio program</a>, noting that Trump stands little chance of being convicted by the GOP-controlled Senate. &#8220;I will tell you, sitting here knowing how divided this country is, I don&#8217;t see the value of taking him out of office. But I do see the value of putting down a marker saying his behavior is not acceptable. It&#8217;s in violation of the oath of office of a president of the United States, and we have to be clear that you cannot use your power of the presidency to withhold funds to get a foreign country to investigate an American citizen for your own personal gain. There&#8217;s no way around that.&#8221;</p>
<p>Lawrence continued: &#8220;I want him censured. I want it on the record that the House of Representatives did their job and they told this president and any president coming behind him that this is unacceptable behavior and, under our Constitution, we will not allow it. &#8230; I am a Democrat, but I am an independent United States of America citizen.&#8221;</p>
<p>Lawrence occupies a safely Democratic district that includes eastern Detroit, and her reluctance to move forward with impeachment suggested that moderate Democrats in swing districts may also be getting cold feet now that all scheduled hearings in the probe <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/politics/schiff-dems-now-preparing-impeachment-report-for-house-judiciary-committee" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">wrapped up</a> last week.</p>
<p>Recent <a href="https://thehill.com/hilltv/rising/471945-overall-interest-in-impeachment-inquiry-slips-among-democratic-voters" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">surveys</a> indicate that even Democratic voters are losing interest in impeachment. Meanwhile, 50 percent of independents questioned in an <a href="http://maristpoll.marist.edu/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/NPR_PBS-NewsHour_Marist-Poll_USA-NOS-and-Tables_1911181224.pdf#page=3">NPR/PBS/Marist poll</a> conducted Nov. 11-15 did not support impeaching and removing Trump from office, with just 42 percent backing such a move. That’s a noticeable dip in support compared with the previous NPR/PBS/Marist poll – conducted the first week in October – when support stood at 45 percent.</p>
<p>And, a <a href="https://news.gallup.com/poll/268493/trump-approval-holds-steady-face-impeachment-probe.aspx">Gallup poll</a> conducted the first two weeks of November indicated that 45 percent of independent voters supported impeaching and removing the president – with 53 percent opposing the move. That’s a switch from October when the previous Gallup survey put the split at 53-44 percent.</p>
<p><img decoding="async" src="https://a57.foxnews.com/static.foxnews.com/foxnews.com/content/uploads/2019/11/640/320/EJ1AVzJW4AIqX58.jpg?ve=1&amp;tl=1" alt="Michigan Democratic Rep. Brenda Lawrence said she no longer sees any &quot;value&quot; in impeachment, and called for a censure resolution. (House of Representatives)" /><br />
Michigan Democratic Rep. Brenda Lawrence said she no longer sees any &#8220;value&#8221; in impeachment, and called for a censure resolution. (House of Representatives)</p>
<hr />
<p>Republicans could also use a Senate trial to turn the tables and <a href="https://www.foxnews.com/politics/in-trump-impeachment-trial-senate-republicans-could-turn-tables-on-dems" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">damage Democrats politically</a>, should the House vote to impeach.</p>
<p>The Washington Examiner <a href="https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/house-democrat-backs-down-from-impeachment-i-dont-see-the-value-of-kicking-him-out-of-office" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">noted</a> that in a <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d77QPlc9jQU&amp;feature=emb_logo" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">radio interview Oct. 4,</a> before support for impeachment fell sharply, Lawrence was far more supportive of the proceedings against the president.</p>
<p>&#8220;I feel strongly that for my legacy, for my time in history, sitting here at this table with an oath of office to protect this country, to protect the democracy of the United States of America, I cannot sit silent, that I must move forward with [impeachment] because this is egregious,&#8221; Lawrence said in October.</p>
<p>The House is now comprised of 431 members, meaning Democrats need 217 yeas to impeach Trump. There are currently 233 Democrats, so Democrats can only lose 16 of their own and still impeach the president. 31 House Democrats represent more moderate districts that Trump carried in 2016.</p>
<p><strong><a href="https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ex-ukraine-envoy-nsc-official-testify-in-second-round-of-impeachment-testimony" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">TWO WITNESSES UNDERCUT IMPROPER &#8216;QUID PRO QUO&#8217; CLAIMS</a>; </strong><strong><a href="https://www.foxnews.com/politics/sondland-denies-rogue-diplomacy-in-ukraine-talks-acknowledges-potential-quid-pro-quo-with-aid-holdup" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">DEMS&#8217; STAR WITNESS SONDLAND SAYS HE &#8216;PRESUMED,&#8217; &#8216;GUESSED&#8217; </a></strong></p>
<div class="embed-media twitter">
<div class="tweet-embed">
<div class="SandboxRoot env-bp-350" data-twitter-event-id="0">
<div id="twitter-widget-0" class="EmbeddedTweet EmbeddedTweet--cta js-clickToOpenTarget" lang="en" data-click-to-open-target="https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1198681216934912000" data-iframe-title="Twitter Tweet" data-scribe="page:tweet" data-twitter-event-id="1">
<div class="EmbeddedTweet-tweetContainer">
<div class="EmbeddedTweet-tweet">
<blockquote class="Tweet h-entry js-tweetIdInfo subject expanded" cite="https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1198681216934912000" data-tweet-id="1198681216934912000" data-scribe="section:subject">
<div class="Tweet-header"><a class="TweetAuthor-avatar  Identity-avatar u-linkBlend" href="https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump" data-scribe="element:user_link" aria-label="Donald J. Trump (screen name: realDonaldTrump)"><img decoding="async" class="Avatar" src="https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/874276197357596672/kUuht00m_normal.jpg" alt="" data-scribe="element:avatar" data-src-2x="https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/874276197357596672/kUuht00m_bigger.jpg" data-src-1x="https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/874276197357596672/kUuht00m_normal.jpg" /></a></p>
<div class="TweetAuthor js-inViewportScribingTarget" data-scribe="component:author">
<div class="TweetAuthor-nameScreenNameContainer"><span class="TweetAuthor-decoratedName"><span class="TweetAuthor-name Identity-name customisable-highlight" title="Donald J. Trump" data-scribe="element:name">Donald J. Trump</span></span>@realDonaldTrump</div>
</div>
<div class="Tweet-brand">
<div class="Icon Icon--twitter " title="View on Twitter" role="presentation" aria-label="View on Twitter"></div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="Tweet-body e-entry-content" data-scribe="component:tweet">
<p class="Tweet-text e-entry-title" dir="ltr" lang="en">But I did nothing wrong. Read the Transcripts (2)! <a class="link customisable" dir="ltr" title="https://twitter.com/johnrobertsfox/status/1197884074540650498" href="https://t.co/Ef9O5kOgrg" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" data-expanded-url="https://twitter.com/johnrobertsfox/status/1197884074540650498" data-tweet-id="1197884074540650498" data-tweet-item-type="23" data-scribe="element:url"><span class="u-hiddenVisually">https://</span>twitter.com/johnrobertsfox<span class="u-hiddenVisually">/status/1197884074540650498 </span>…</a></p>
<div class="Tweet-card">
<div class="QuoteTweet" tabindex="0" data-scribe="section:quote">
<div class="QuoteTweet-nonMediaContainer">
<div class="TweetAuthor js-inViewportScribingTarget TweetAuthor--oneLine" data-scribe="component:author">
<div class="TweetAuthor-nameScreenNameContainer"><span class="TweetAuthor-decoratedName"><span class="TweetAuthor-name Identity-name customisable-highlight" title="John Roberts" data-scribe="element:name">John Roberts</span></span>@johnrobertsFox</div>
</div>
<div></div>
<p class="QuoteTweet-text e-entry-title" dir="ltr" lang="en">With all the talk of whether to censure <span class="PrettyLink-prefix">@</span><span class="PrettyLink-value">realDonaldTrump</span> , I thought it would be interesting to see a picture of the first President to be censured by Congress</p>
</div>
<div class="QuotedTweet-media">
<article class="MediaCard

           customisable-border" dir="ltr" data-scribe="component:card"></p>
<div class="MediaCard-media" data-scribe="element:photo">
<div class="MediaCard-widthConstraint js-cspForcedStyle" data-style="max-width: 1200px">
<div class="MediaCard-mediaContainer js-cspForcedStyle MediaCard--roundedBottom" data-style="padding-bottom: 45.4167%">
<div class="MediaCard-mediaAsset NaturalImage"><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" class="NaturalImage-image" title="View image on Twitter" src="https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EJ-9NIpWsAAVTmW?format=jpg&amp;name=small" alt="View image on Twitter" width="737" height="335" data-image="https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EJ-9NIpWsAAVTmW" data-image-format="jpg" /></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</article>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p>There have been signs close to home for Lawrence that Democrats should consider pulling the ripcord on the impeachment process. In an editorial last week, The Detroit News <a href="https://www.detroitnews.com/story/opinion/editorials/2019/11/24/editorial-house-should-censure-not-impeach-trump/4259077002/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">wrote</a> that the House &#8220;should censure, not impeach&#8221; the president.</p>
<p>&#8220;Democrats still don&#8217;t have the strong case they&#8217;re seeking to justify removing President Donald Trump from office,&#8221; the paper wrote. &#8220;Censure amounts to a public shaming. &#8230; But it also recognizes the offense does not merit removal from office. That, too, seems appropriate, given the inconclusive testimony so far.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="https://www.foxnews.com/politics/schiff-dems-now-preparing-impeachment-report-for-house-judiciary-committee" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"><strong>SCHIFF SUGGESTS IMPEACHMENT INQUIRY TO WRAP UP SHORTLY AFTER THANKSGIVING</strong></a></p>
<p>Earlier this month, freshman Rep. Elissa Slotkin, D-Mich. &#8212; who flipped a GOP district in 2018 that Trump won by 7 points in 2016 &#8212; told Fox News that she was tentatively weighing all the evidence.</p>
<p>&#8220;My constituents expect me to make an objective decision,&#8221; Slotkin said as the hearings concluded, &#8220;not one based on an hour of testimony.&#8221;</p>
<p>Slotkin went on to acknowledge that launching an impeachment inquiry was a &#8220;politically tough thing to do.&#8221;</p>
<p>The censure process is not prescribed by the Constitution, and amounts essentially to a condemnation of conduct, without any substantive consequence, by a majority vote in either the House or the Senate.</p>
<blockquote class="pull-quote">
<p class="quote-text">&#8220;I don&#8217;t see the value of taking him out of office. &#8230; I want him censured.&#8221;</p>
<p><span class="quote-author">— Michigan Democratic Rep. Brenda Lawrence</span></p></blockquote>
<p>President <a title="Andrew Jackson" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_Jackson">Andrew Jackson</a> was censured in a largely political process by the Senate in 1834, although it was expunged three years later. Several other U.S. presidents have been reprimanded by Congress, including Abraham Lincoln, James Buchanan, and William Howard Taft.</p>
<p>Still, top Democrats have signaled they will go ahead with impeachment, at least for now. House Intelligence Committee Chairman <a href="https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/democrats-trump-impeachment-liz-peek" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Adam Schiff,</a> D-Calif., announced Monday that Democrats &#8220;are now preparing a report&#8221; for the House Judiciary Committee, indicating that his panel is wrapping up its work and that the next phase of the impeachment inquiry is imminent.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.foxnews.com/politics/bloomberg-warns-that-trump-is-positioned-to-win-reelection-in-first-presidential-campaign-appearance" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"><strong>BLOOMBERG, IN FIRST CAMPAIGN APPEARANCE, WARNS THAT TRUMP IS IN POSITION TO WIN IN 2020</strong></a></p>
<p>Calling the evidence against the president &#8220;overwhelming, unchallenged and damning,&#8221; Schiff nevertheless asserted that investigative work would continue, and left open the possibility that Democrats would hold additional hearings.  But all scheduled public hearings before Schiff&#8217;s panel <a href="https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ex-nsc-aide-fiona-hill-david-holmes" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">wrapped up on a testy note</a> last week, and no new proceedings are planned.</p>
<p>&#8220;As required under, House Resolution 660 the Committees are now preparing a report summarizing the evidence we have found this far, which will be transmitted to the Judiciary Committee soon after Congress returns from the Thanksgiving recess,&#8221; Schiff wrote in a letter to congressional colleagues.</p>
<p>He noted that the report &#8220;will catalog the instances of non-compliance with lawful subpoenas as part of our report to the Judiciary Committee, which will allow that committee to consider whether an article of impeachment based on obstruction of Congress is warranted along with an article or articles based on this underlying conduct or other presidential misconduct. Such obstruction was the basis of the third article of impeachment against President Richard Nixon.&#8221;</p>
<hr />
<p>Source: <a href="https://www.foxnews.com/politics/house-dem-reverses-course-on-impeachment-as-polls-show-declining-support-i-want-to-censure" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://www.foxnews.com/politics/house-dem-reverses-course-on-impeachment-as-polls-show-declining-support-i-want-to-censure</a></p>
[<a href="https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org/news/disclaimer/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Disclaimer</a>]<p>The post <a href="https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org/house-dem-now-sees-no-value-in-impeachment-as-polls-show-falling-support-among-independents/">House Dem now sees no ‘value’ in impeachment, as polls show falling support among independents</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org">Garner Ted Armstrong Evangelistic Association</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cornyn: No quid pro quo in Trump&#8217;s actions, but wouldn&#8217;t be impeachable if there were</title>
		<link>https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org/cornyn-no-quid-pro-quo-in-trumps-actions-but-wouldnt-be-impeachable-if-there-were/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=cornyn-no-quid-pro-quo-in-trumps-actions-but-wouldnt-be-impeachable-if-there-were</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jordain Carney]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Nov 2019 17:35:07 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donald Trump]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hunter Biden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Impeachment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Impeachment inquiry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Biden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Crnyn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quid Pro Quo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rudy Giuliani]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trump-Ukraine phone call]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ukraine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ukraine call]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States (US)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volodymyr Zelensky]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.garnertedarmstrong.org/?p=29517</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas) said on Monday that he didn&#8217;t see an example of quid pro quo during the conversation between President Trump and Ukraine&#8217;s President Volodymyr Zelensky, but argued that even if there was, it wouldn&#8217;t warrant removing the president from office. Cornyn, when asked if there was a quid pro quo, pointed to a rough transcript of...</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org/cornyn-no-quid-pro-quo-in-trumps-actions-but-wouldnt-be-impeachable-if-there-were/">Cornyn: No quid pro quo in Trump’s actions, but wouldn’t be impeachable if there were</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org">Garner Ted Armstrong Evangelistic Association</a>.</p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img decoding="async" src="https://thehill.com/sites/default/files/styles/thumb_small_article/public/cornynjohn_073019as.jpg?itok=oqn5MmC2" alt="Cornyn: No quid pro quo in Trump's actions, but wouldn't be impeachable if there were" /><br />
Sen. <span class="rollover-people" data-behavior="rolloverpeople"><a class="rollover-people-link" href="https://thehill.com/people/john-cornyn" data-nid="188237">John Cornyn</a></span> (R-Texas) said on Monday that he didn&#8217;t see an example of quid pro quo during the conversation between <span class="rollover-people" data-behavior="rolloverpeople"><a class="rollover-people-link" href="https://thehill.com/people/donald-trump" data-nid="261287">President Trump</a></span> and Ukraine&#8217;s President Volodymyr Zelensky, but argued that even if there was, it wouldn&#8217;t warrant removing the president from office.</p>
<div dir="ltr">Cornyn, when asked if there was a quid pro quo, pointed to a rough transcript of the conversation between the two leaders, saying he didn&#8217;t &#8220;see the quid pro quo.&#8221;</p>
<div>
<div>&#8220;Even if there was, I don&#8217;t think it would be impeachable or illegal for the president to do so. So this is just an excuse, I think, to continue this campaign that&#8217;s existed since the president was sworn in to remove him from office,&#8221; Cornyn said during an interview with Texas radio station KFYO.</div>
</div>
<div></div>
<div>The Washington Post <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/growing-number-of-gop-senators-consider-acknowledgingtrumps-quid-pro-quo-on-ukraine/2019/11/01/72084a3e-fcc4-11e9-9534-e0dbcc9f5683_story.html">reported last week</a> that some Senate Republicans were mulling a strategy that would acknowledge a quid pro quo, but also argue that the action was not illegal and it was not impeachable.</div>
<div></div>
<div>Cornyn argued on Monday there was a &#8220;double standard&#8221; being applied to Trump&#8217;s actions.</div>
<div></div>
<div>
<div>&#8220;What never fails to amaze me is the double standard that is applied to this president as opposed to other presidents. It&#8217;s always been the case that presidents have been able to leverage aid to other countries in order to advance U.S. policy. And here there was a corruption problem in Ukraine,&#8221; Cornyn said.</div>
<div></div>
<div>Trump, during his conversation with Zelensky, asked the Ukrainian president to work with his personal attorney, <span class="rollover-people" data-behavior="rolloverpeople"><a class="rollover-people-link" href="https://thehill.com/people/rudy-giuliani" data-nid="444404">Rudy Giuliani</a></span>, to &#8220;look into&#8221; former Vice President Biden and his son, Hunter Biden.</div>
</div>
<div></div>
<div>In their ongoing impeachment investigation, Democrats have focused on that call, a related whistleblower complaint and whether Trump tied aid to the country to Ukraine opening up an investigation into the Bidens.</div>
<div></div>
<div>The House is expected to start holding public hearings as soon as this month as it continues its investigation.</div>
<div></div>
<div>Republicans view it as increasingly likely that the House will vote to impeach Trump, setting up a trial in the Senate.</div>
<div></div>
<div>Cornyn on Monday said there wasn&#8217;t &#8220;any reasonable chance,&#8221; based on current information, that the Senate would convict Trump, an action that requires the vote of 67 senators.</div>
<div></div>
<div>Instead, he argued that Trump should focus on policy, and let Senate Republicans handle the impeachment articles if they come over from the House.</div>
<div></div>
<div>
<div>&#8220;I would tell him, let us do our jobs, and if the House does vote on the impeachment articles, let the Senate do its job and focus on what&#8217;s good for the American people. &#8230; We&#8217;ll take care of the impeachment articles if and when they come to the Senate,&#8221; Cornyn said.</p>
<hr />
<p>Source: <a href="https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/468851-cornyn-no-quid-pro-quo-but-wouldnt-be-impeachable-if-there-was" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/468851-cornyn-no-quid-pro-quo-but-wouldnt-be-impeachable-if-there-was</a></p>
[<a href="https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org/news/disclaimer/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Disclaimer</a>]</div>
</div>
</div><p>The post <a href="https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org/cornyn-no-quid-pro-quo-in-trumps-actions-but-wouldnt-be-impeachable-if-there-were/">Cornyn: No quid pro quo in Trump’s actions, but wouldn’t be impeachable if there were</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org">Garner Ted Armstrong Evangelistic Association</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
