<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>United States Supreme Court - Garner Ted Armstrong Evangelistic Association</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org/tag/united-states-supreme-court/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org</link>
	<description>Let No Man Take Your Crown</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2025 22:59:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Clarence Thomas says precedent might not determine cases on upcoming supreme court docket</title>
		<link>https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org/clarence-thomas-says-precedent-might-not-determine-cases-on-upcoming-supreme-court-docket/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=clarence-thomas-says-precedent-might-not-determine-cases-on-upcoming-supreme-court-docket</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ramon Antonio Vargas | The Guardian]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2025 22:59:52 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Breaking News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Clarence Thomas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Same-Sex marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States Supreme Court]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org/?p=48162</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The court is expected to weigh in next session on same-sex marriage, which it legalized in 2015 Settled legal precedent in the US is not “gospel” and in some instances may have been “something somebody dreamt up and others went along with”, the US supreme court justice Clarence Thomas has said. Thomas – part of...</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org/clarence-thomas-says-precedent-might-not-determine-cases-on-upcoming-supreme-court-docket/">Clarence Thomas says precedent might not determine cases on upcoming supreme court docket</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org">Garner Ted Armstrong Evangelistic Association</a>.</p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The court is expected to weigh in next session on same-sex marriage, which it legalized in 2015</strong></p>
<p class="dcr-130mj7b">Settled legal precedent in the US is not “gospel” and in some instances may have been “something somebody dreamt up and others went along with”, the <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/us-supreme-court" data-link-name="in body link">US supreme court</a> justice <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/clarence-thomas" data-link-name="in body link">Clarence Thomas</a> has said.</p>
<p class="dcr-130mj7b">Thomas – part of the conservative supermajority that has taken hold of the supreme court over <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/donaldtrump" data-link-name="in body link">Donald Trump</a>’s two presidencies – delivered those comments Thursday at the Catholic University of America’s Columbus School of Law in Washington DC, ABC News and other outlets <a href="https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/justice-clarence-thomas-legal-precedents-gospel/story?id=125967044" data-link-name="in body link">reported</a>. His remarks preceded the nine-month term that the supreme court is scheduled to begin on 6 October.</p>
<p>Continue reading <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/sep/28/clarance-thomas-precedence-supreme-court-docket">HERE</a></p>
<p>Source: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/sep/28/clarance-thomas-precedence-supreme-court-docket</p>
<hr />
[<a href="https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org/news/disclaimer/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Disclaimer</a>]<p>The post <a href="https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org/clarence-thomas-says-precedent-might-not-determine-cases-on-upcoming-supreme-court-docket/">Clarence Thomas says precedent might not determine cases on upcoming supreme court docket</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org">Garner Ted Armstrong Evangelistic Association</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court unanimously revives straight woman’s ‘reverse discrimination’ lawsuit</title>
		<link>https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org/supreme-court-unanimously-revives-straight-womans-reverse-discrimination-lawsuit/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=supreme-court-unanimously-revives-straight-womans-reverse-discrimination-lawsuit</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Melody Armstrong]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2025 23:21:22 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Breaking News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Rights Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reverse discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States Supreme Court]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org/?p=47633</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Supreme Court unanimously revived a straight woman’s “reverse discrimination” case against her former employer Thursday, lowering the legal hurdle for white and straight employees to bring such lawsuits. The 9-0 decision rejects that members of a majority group must show “background circumstances” in addition to the normal requirements to prove a claim under Title...</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org/supreme-court-unanimously-revives-straight-womans-reverse-discrimination-lawsuit/">Supreme Court unanimously revives straight woman’s ‘reverse discrimination’ lawsuit</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org">Garner Ted Armstrong Evangelistic Association</a>.</p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="keep">The Supreme Court unanimously revived a straight woman’s <a href="https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/5165572-supreme-court-reverse-discrimination-case/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">“reverse discrimination” case against her former employer</a> Thursday, lowering the legal hurdle for white and straight employees to bring such lawsuits.</p>
<p class="keep">The <a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/23-1039_c0n2.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">9-0 decision</a> rejects that members of a majority group must show “background circumstances” in addition to the normal requirements to prove a claim under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex and national origin.</p>
<p>“We conclude that Title VII does not impose such a heightened standard on majority-group plaintiffs,” Justice <span class="person-popover" data-nid="38181"><a class="person-popover__link" href="https://thehill.com/people/ketanji-brown-jackson/">Ketanji Brown Jackson,</a></span> former <span class="person-popover multiline" data-nid="5215"><a class="person-popover__link" href="https://thehill.com/people/joe-biden/">President Biden’s </a></span>sole appointee to the court, wrote for the court.</p>
<p>Marlean Ames, who worked for the Ohio Department of Youth Services for two decades, sued under the landmark law over claims she was passed over for a promotion and demoted in favor of gay colleagues.</p>
<p>Ames appealed to the Supreme Court after lower judges ruled in favor of Ohio, finding Ames hadn’t shown proven “background circumstances” that indicate hers is the unusual case where an employer is discriminating against the majority.</p>
<p>Continue reading <a href="https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/5334394-supreme-court-reverse-discrimination-lawsuit/">HERE</a></p>
<p>Source: https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/5334394-supreme-court-reverse-discrimination-lawsuit/</p>
<hr />
[<a href="https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org/news/disclaimer/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Disclaimer</a>]<p>The post <a href="https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org/supreme-court-unanimously-revives-straight-womans-reverse-discrimination-lawsuit/">Supreme Court unanimously revives straight woman’s ‘reverse discrimination’ lawsuit</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org">Garner Ted Armstrong Evangelistic Association</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>What&#8217;s next for Venezuelans after Supreme Court allows Trump to revoke protected status?</title>
		<link>https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org/whats-next-for-venezuelans-after-supreme-court-allows-trump-to-revoke-protected-status/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=whats-next-for-venezuelans-after-supreme-court-allows-trump-to-revoke-protected-status</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniella Silva | NBC News]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2025 22:40:04 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Breaking News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Temporary Protected Status (TPS)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Venezuelans]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org/?p=47567</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Trump has moved to strip Temporary Protected Status from thousands of Venezuelans living legally in the U.S., and they now could face imminent deportation. A two-paragraph Supreme Court order is upending the lives of some 350,000 Venezuelan migrants who have been allowed to live and work in the U.S. with special legal protection from deportation....</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org/whats-next-for-venezuelans-after-supreme-court-allows-trump-to-revoke-protected-status/">What’s next for Venezuelans after Supreme Court allows Trump to revoke protected status?</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org">Garner Ted Armstrong Evangelistic Association</a>.</p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Trump has moved to strip Temporary Protected Status from thousands of Venezuelans living legally in the U.S., and they now could face imminent deportation.</strong></p>
<p class="body-graf">A two-paragraph Supreme Court order is upending the lives of some 350,000 Venezuelan migrants who have been allowed to live and work in the U.S. with special legal protection from deportation.</p>
<p class="body-graf">The court’s order Monday allows the Trump administration to strip Temporary Protected Status from the group of hundreds of thousands of Venezuelans as a legal case on the matter continues.</p>
<p>Attorneys representing the TPS holders said the Supreme Court’s brief order raises questions, including exactly when the 350,000 Venezuelans will lose their legal protections.</p>
<p>Continue reading <a href="https://www.nbcnews.com/news/latino/venezuelans-supreme-court-trump-ruling-tps-what-expect-rcna207912">HERE</a></p>
<p>Source: https://www.nbcnews.com/news/latino/venezuelans-supreme-court-trump-ruling-tps-what-expect-rcna207912</p>
<hr />
[<a href="https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org/news/disclaimer/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Disclaimer</a>]<p>The post <a href="https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org/whats-next-for-venezuelans-after-supreme-court-allows-trump-to-revoke-protected-status/">What’s next for Venezuelans after Supreme Court allows Trump to revoke protected status?</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org">Garner Ted Armstrong Evangelistic Association</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court&#8217;s conservatives lean toward allowing country&#8217;s first religious public charter school</title>
		<link>https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org/supreme-courts-conservatives-lean-toward-allowing-countrys-first-religious-public-charter-school/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=supreme-courts-conservatives-lean-toward-allowing-countrys-first-religious-public-charter-school</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lawrence Hurley | NBC News]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2025 17:19:01 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Breaking News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Catholic charter school]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oklahoma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religious schools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States Supreme Court]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org/?p=47466</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Oklahoma&#8217;s Republican attorney general says the proposal to launch a Catholic virtual charter school violates the Constitution&#8217;s First Amendment. WASHINGTON — Conservative members of the Supreme Court on Wednesday leaned toward allowing Oklahoma to approve the first-ever religious public charter school in a case that could weaken the separation of church and state. While several...</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org/supreme-courts-conservatives-lean-toward-allowing-countrys-first-religious-public-charter-school/">Supreme Court’s conservatives lean toward allowing country’s first religious public charter school</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org">Garner Ted Armstrong Evangelistic Association</a>.</p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Oklahoma&#8217;s Republican attorney general says the proposal to launch a Catholic virtual charter school violates the Constitution&#8217;s First Amendment.</strong></p>
<p class="body-graf">WASHINGTON — Conservative members of <a href="https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/supreme-court" target="_blank" rel="noopener">the Supreme Court</a> on Wednesday leaned toward allowing Oklahoma to approve the first-ever religious public charter school in a case that could weaken the separation of church and state.</p>
<p class="body-graf">While several conservative justices expressed support for the school&#8217;s arguments, Chief Justice John Roberts emerged during the more than two-hour argument as a potentially decisive vote.</p>
<p>There is the possibility of a 4-4 split, as one justice, conservative Amy Coney Barrett, is not participating. That outcome would preserve an Oklahoma Supreme Court ruling that blocked the proposed school.</p>
<p>Continue reading <a href="https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/supreme-court/supreme-court-considers-endorsing-countrys-first-religious-public-char-rcna203328">HERE</a></p>
<p>Source: https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/supreme-court/supreme-court-considers-endorsing-countrys-first-religious-public-char-rcna203328</p>
<hr />
[<a href="https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org/news/disclaimer/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Disclaimer</a>]<p>The post <a href="https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org/supreme-courts-conservatives-lean-toward-allowing-countrys-first-religious-public-charter-school/">Supreme Court’s conservatives lean toward allowing country’s first religious public charter school</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org">Garner Ted Armstrong Evangelistic Association</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court allows Trump to deport Venezuelans under wartime law, but only after judges’ review</title>
		<link>https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org/supreme-court-allows-trump-to-deport-venezuelans-under-wartime-law-but-only-after-judges-review/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=supreme-court-allows-trump-to-deport-venezuelans-under-wartime-law-but-only-after-judges-review</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MARK SHERMAN | AP NEWS]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2025 15:08:28 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Breaking News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Refugee Crisis America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alien Enemies Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deportations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illegal immigrants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States Supreme Court]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org/?p=47367</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court on Monday allowed the Trump administration to use an 18th century wartime law to deport Venezuelan migrants, but said they must get a court hearing before they are taken from the United States. In a bitterly divided decision, the court said the administration must give Venezuelans who it claims...</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org/supreme-court-allows-trump-to-deport-venezuelans-under-wartime-law-but-only-after-judges-review/">Supreme Court allows Trump to deport Venezuelans under wartime law, but only after judges’ review</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org">Garner Ted Armstrong Evangelistic Association</a>.</p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) — The <span class="LinkEnhancement"><a class="Link AnClick-LinkEnhancement" href="https://apnews.com/hub/us-supreme-court" data-gtm-enhancement-style="LinkEnhancementA">Supreme Court</a></span> on Monday allowed the Trump administration to use an 18th century <span class="LinkEnhancement"><a class="Link AnClick-LinkEnhancement" href="https://apnews.com/article/alien-enemies-trump-immigration-deportations-21a62ede23b8c493b60d00a9c125722f" data-gtm-enhancement-style="LinkEnhancementA">wartime law</a></span> to <span class="LinkEnhancement"><a class="Link AnClick-LinkEnhancement" href="https://apnews.com/article/trump-venezuela-el-salvador-immigration-dd4f61999f85c4dd8bcaba7d4fc7c9af" data-gtm-enhancement-style="LinkEnhancementA">deport Venezuelan migrants</a></span>, but said they must get a court hearing before they are taken from the United States.</p>
<p>In a bitterly divided decision, the court said the administration must give Venezuelans who it claims are gang members “reasonable time” to go to court.</p>
<p>But the conservative majority said the legal challenges must take place in Texas, instead of a Washington courtroom.</p>
<p>Continue reading <a href="https://apnews.com/article/supreme-court-trump-deportations-el-salvador-9988b667199e1b02fc0a6a83570225c1">HERE</a></p>
<p>Source: https://apnews.com/article/supreme-court-trump-deportations-el-salvador-9988b667199e1b02fc0a6a83570225c1</p>
<hr />
[<a href="https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org/news/disclaimer/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Disclaimer</a>]<p>The post <a href="https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org/supreme-court-allows-trump-to-deport-venezuelans-under-wartime-law-but-only-after-judges-review/">Supreme Court allows Trump to deport Venezuelans under wartime law, but only after judges’ review</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org">Garner Ted Armstrong Evangelistic Association</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trump win as top court deals blow to Jan 6 case</title>
		<link>https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org/trump-win-as-top-court-deals-blow-to-jan-6-case/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=trump-win-as-top-court-deals-blow-to-jan-6-case</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anthony Zurcher | BBC]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2024 22:32:49 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Breaking News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donald Trump]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Presidential Immunity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCOTUS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States Supreme Court]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org/?p=46050</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Shortly after the Supreme Court issued its decision on his claim of presidential immunity, Donald Trump took to social media to celebrate. “Big win for our constitution and democracy,” he posted on Truth Social. &#8220;Proud to be an American!” While Trump did not get the sweeping protections that he and his lawyers had sought, he...</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org/trump-win-as-top-court-deals-blow-to-jan-6-case/">Trump win as top court deals blow to Jan 6 case</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org">Garner Ted Armstrong Evangelistic Association</a>.</p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="sc-eb7bd5f6-0 fYAfXe">Shortly after the Supreme Court issued its decision on his claim of presidential immunity, Donald Trump took to social media to celebrate.</p>
<p class="sc-eb7bd5f6-0 fYAfXe">“Big win for our constitution and democracy,” he posted on Truth Social. &#8220;Proud to be an American!”</p>
<p class="sc-eb7bd5f6-0 fYAfXe">While Trump did not get the sweeping protections that he and his lawyers had sought, he got more than enough to achieve his immediate objective of delaying another trial until after November&#8217;s election.</p>
<p class="sc-eb7bd5f6-0 fYAfXe">The ruling from the six conservative justices dealt a serious blow to the federal criminal case against him on charges of <a class="sc-c9299ecf-0 bZUiKB" href="https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-61084161" target="_self" rel="noopener">attempting to overturn the results of the 2020 election</a>.</p>
<p>Continue reading <a href="https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c903q4yq4deo">HERE</a></p>
<p>Source: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c903q4yq4deo</p>
<hr />
[<a href="https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org/news/disclaimer/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Disclaimer</a>]<p>The post <a href="https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org/trump-win-as-top-court-deals-blow-to-jan-6-case/">Trump win as top court deals blow to Jan 6 case</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org">Garner Ted Armstrong Evangelistic Association</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>US Supreme Court curbs federal agency powers, overturning 1984 precedent</title>
		<link>https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org/us-supreme-court-curbs-federal-agency-powers-overturning-1984-precedent/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=us-supreme-court-curbs-federal-agency-powers-overturning-1984-precedent</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Kruzel and Andrew Chung | Reuters]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2024 22:04:11 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Breaking News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chevron precedent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States Supreme Court]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org/?p=46038</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON, June 28 (Reuters) &#8211; The U.S. Supreme Court dealt a major blow to federal regulatory power on Friday by overturning a 1984 precedent that had given deference to government agencies in interpreting laws they administer, handing a defeat to President Joe Biden&#8217;s administration. The justices ruled 6-3 to set aside lower court decisions against...</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org/us-supreme-court-curbs-federal-agency-powers-overturning-1984-precedent/">US Supreme Court curbs federal agency powers, overturning 1984 precedent</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org">Garner Ted Armstrong Evangelistic Association</a>.</p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="text__text__1FZLe text__dark-grey__3Ml43 text__regular__2N1Xr text__small__1kGq2 body__full_width__ekUdw body__small_body__2vQyf article-body__paragraph__2-BtD" data-testid="paragraph-0">WASHINGTON, June 28 (Reuters) &#8211; The <a class="text__text__1FZLe text__inherit-color__3208F text__inherit-font__1Y8w3 text__inherit-size__1DZJi link__link__3Ji6W link__underline_default__2prE_" href="https://www.reuters.com/legal/us-supreme-court/" data-testid="Link">U.S. Supreme Court</a> dealt a major blow to federal regulatory power on Friday by overturning a 1984 precedent that had given deference to government agencies in interpreting laws they administer, handing a defeat to President <a class="text__text__1FZLe text__inherit-color__3208F text__inherit-font__1Y8w3 text__inherit-size__1DZJi link__link__3Ji6W link__underline_default__2prE_" href="https://www.reuters.com/topic/person/joe-biden/" data-testid="Link">Joe Biden&#8217;s</a> administration.</p>
<p class="text__text__1FZLe text__dark-grey__3Ml43 text__regular__2N1Xr text__small__1kGq2 body__full_width__ekUdw body__small_body__2vQyf article-body__paragraph__2-BtD" data-testid="paragraph-1">The justices ruled 6-3 to set aside lower court decisions against <a class="text__text__1FZLe text__inherit-color__3208F text__inherit-font__1Y8w3 text__inherit-size__1DZJi link__link__3Ji6W link__underline_default__2prE_" href="https://www.reuters.com/legal/supreme-court-may-reel-us-agency-powers-fishing-dispute-2024-01-17/" data-testid="Link">fishing companies</a> that challenged a government-run program partly funded by industry that monitored overfishing of herring off New England&#8217;s coast. It marked the latest decision in recent years powered by the Supreme Court&#8217;s conservative majority that hemmed in the authority of federal agencies.</p>
<div data-testid="paragraph-1">
<p class="text__text__1FZLe text__dark-grey__3Ml43 text__regular__2N1Xr text__small__1kGq2 body__full_width__ekUdw body__small_body__2vQyf article-body__paragraph__2-BtD" data-testid="paragraph-2">The precedent the court overturned arose from a ruling involving oil company Chevron that had called for judges to defer to reasonable federal agency interpretations of U.S. laws deemed to be ambiguous. This doctrine, long opposed by conservatives and business interests, was called &#8220;Chevron deference.&#8221;</p>
<p class="text__text__1FZLe text__dark-grey__3Ml43 text__regular__2N1Xr text__small__1kGq2 body__full_width__ekUdw body__small_body__2vQyf article-body__paragraph__2-BtD" data-testid="paragraph-3">&#8220;Chevron is overruled. Courts must exercise their independent judgment in deciding whether an agency has acted within its statutory authority,&#8221; Chief Justice John Roberts wrote in the decision.</p>
<p data-testid="paragraph-3">Continue reading <a href="https://www.reuters.com/legal/us-supreme-court-curbs-federal-agency-powers-overturning-1984-precedent-2024-06-28/">HERE</a></p>
<p data-testid="paragraph-3">Source: https://www.reuters.com/legal/us-supreme-court-curbs-federal-agency-powers-overturning-1984-precedent-2024-06-28/</p>
<hr />
<p data-testid="paragraph-3">[<a href="https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org/news/disclaimer/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Disclaimer</a>]
</div><p>The post <a href="https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org/us-supreme-court-curbs-federal-agency-powers-overturning-1984-precedent/">US Supreme Court curbs federal agency powers, overturning 1984 precedent</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org">Garner Ted Armstrong Evangelistic Association</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court stands by its guidelines after report raises new ethics questions</title>
		<link>https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org/supreme-court-stands-by-its-guidelines-after-report-raises-new-ethics-questions/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=supreme-court-stands-by-its-guidelines-after-report-raises-new-ethics-questions</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ariane de Vogue | CNN Supreme Court Reporter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2023 19:21:54 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Breaking News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Code of Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court Justices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States Supreme Court]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org/?p=44241</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>(CNN) &#8211; The Supreme Court is holding fast to its ethics procedures in light of a new report raising questions about the extent to which colleges and universities have used campus visits by justices as an opportunity to generate donations despite a general ban on judicial fundraising. In the report published by the Associated Press on Tuesday, the...</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org/supreme-court-stands-by-its-guidelines-after-report-raises-new-ethics-questions/">Supreme Court stands by its guidelines after report raises new ethics questions</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org">Garner Ted Armstrong Evangelistic Association</a>.</p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="paragraph inline-placeholder" data-uri="cms.cnn.com/_components/paragraph/instances/paragraph_EB11F35A-B843-05A3-AB5C-4613B1EF5FA7@published" data-editable="text" data-component-name="paragraph" data-analytics-observe="off">(CNN) &#8211; The <a href="https://www.cnn.com/politics/supreme-court" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Supreme Court </a>is holding fast to its ethics procedures in light of a new report raising questions about the extent to which colleges and universities have used campus visits by justices as an opportunity to generate donations despite a general ban on judicial fundraising.</p>
<p class="paragraph inline-placeholder" data-uri="cms.cnn.com/_components/paragraph/instances/paragraph_2348C7EB-4469-5386-5062-4646BAAFD9B2@published" data-editable="text" data-component-name="paragraph" data-analytics-observe="off">In the report published by the <a href="https://apnews.com/article/supreme-court-sotomayor-book-sales-ethics-colleges-b2cb93493f927f995829762cb8338c02" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Associated Press</a> on Tuesday, the outlet also raises questions concerning Justice Sonia Sotomayor’s use of court staff to coordinate book sales.</p>
<p class="paragraph inline-placeholder" data-uri="cms.cnn.com/_components/paragraph/instances/paragraph_B196DB64-4E56-93E6-A22B-4646BAB6EC70@published" data-editable="text" data-component-name="paragraph" data-analytics-observe="off">“The Judicial Code of Ethics encourages judges to stay connected to community activities and to engage with the public, including by writing on both legal and nonlegal subjects,” Patricia McCabe, the Supreme Court’s public information officer, told the AP in a statement, adding that the justices “routinely travel and speak to university, college and law school audiences and affiliated individuals and entities.”</p>
<p>Continue reading <a href="https://www.cnn.com/2023/07/11/politics/supreme-court-ethics/index.html">HERE</a></p>
<p>Source: https://www.cnn.com/2023/07/11/politics/supreme-court-ethics/index.html</p>
<hr />
[<a href="https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org/news/disclaimer/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Disclaimer</a>]<p>The post <a href="https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org/supreme-court-stands-by-its-guidelines-after-report-raises-new-ethics-questions/">Supreme Court stands by its guidelines after report raises new ethics questions</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org">Garner Ted Armstrong Evangelistic Association</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Supreme Court unanimously expands religious protections for workers</title>
		<link>https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org/the-supreme-court-unanimously-expands-religious-protections-for-workers/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-supreme-court-unanimously-expands-religious-protections-for-workers</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nicole Russell | US News]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2023 19:31:58 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Breaking News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religious accommodations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[undue hardship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States Supreme Court]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org/?p=44144</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Supreme Court released three rulings on Thursday, one of which was the behemoth 6-3 decision to throw out affirmative action in higher education; the other was a ruling about a trademark infringement case. The final is an important, but somewhat quieter, ruling that strengthens legal protections for people of faith in the workforce. In...</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org/the-supreme-court-unanimously-expands-religious-protections-for-workers/">The Supreme Court unanimously expands religious protections for workers</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org">Garner Ted Armstrong Evangelistic Association</a>.</p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Supreme Court released three rulings on Thursday, one of which was the behemoth 6-3 decision to <a class="Link " href="https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/policy/courts/supreme-court-affirmative-action-race-conscious-college-admissions" target="_blank" rel="noopener">throw out affirmative action</a> in higher education; the other was a ruling about a trademark infringement case. The final is an important, but somewhat quieter, ruling that strengthens legal protections for people of faith in the workforce.</p>
<p>In a <a class="Link " href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/22-174_k536.pdf">9-0 decision</a> in the case <i>Groff v. DeJoy,</i> the Supreme Court clarified the precedent used to decide religious accommodations in the workplace, expanding them and sending this case back to the lower courts in light of the ruling.</p>
<p>In the 1977 ruling <i>Trans World Airlines v. Hardison, </i>the court said employers need not make religious accommodations for an employee should doing so impose even a small burden on the employer, or as Title VII says, imposes an “undue hardship.” The justices felt this language was unclear.</p>
<p>Continue reading <a href="https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/restoring-america/faith-freedom-self-reliance/the-supreme-court-unanimously-expands-religious-protections-for-workers">HERE</a></p>
<p><strong>Source:</strong> https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/restoring-america/faith-freedom-self-reliance/the-supreme-court-unanimously-expands-religious-protections-for-workers</p>
<hr />
[<a href="https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org/news/disclaimer/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Disclaimer</a>]<p>The post <a href="https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org/the-supreme-court-unanimously-expands-religious-protections-for-workers/">The Supreme Court unanimously expands religious protections for workers</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org">Garner Ted Armstrong Evangelistic Association</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>US Supreme Court strikes down student loan forgiveness plan</title>
		<link>https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org/us-supreme-court-strikes-down-student-loan-forgiveness-plan/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=us-supreme-court-strikes-down-student-loan-forgiveness-plan</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[1 Jessica Parker at the Supreme Court & Bernd Debusmann Jr - BBC News, Washington DC]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2023 19:24:53 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Breaking News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Student Loan Forgiveness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States Supreme Court]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org/?p=44141</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The US Supreme Court has struck down US President Joe Biden&#8217;s proposal to wipe out billions in student debt. The 6-3 ruling effectively cancels the plan, which would have forgiven about $10,000 (£7,800) per borrower &#8211; and up to $20,000 in some cases. But the plan has been in limbo since some conservative states sued,...</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org/us-supreme-court-strikes-down-student-loan-forgiveness-plan/">US Supreme Court strikes down student loan forgiveness plan</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org">Garner Ted Armstrong Evangelistic Association</a>.</p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The US Supreme Court has struck down US President Joe Biden&#8217;s proposal to wipe out billions in student debt.</p>
<p>The 6-3 ruling effectively cancels the plan, which would have forgiven about $10,000 (£7,800) per borrower &#8211; and up to $20,000 in some cases.</p>
<p>But the plan has been in limbo since some conservative states sued, arguing the president overstepped his authority. The Supreme Court agreed.</p>
<p>The decision affects the loans of more than 40 million Americans.</p>
<p>In the wake of the decision, US media reported that President Biden is expected to announce new actions to protect borrowers later on Friday. In a statement, Mr Biden said that &#8220;the fight is not over&#8221; and that he believed that the ruling was &#8220;wrong&#8221;.</p>
<div class="caas-da">
<div id="sda-INARTICLE">The total federal student debt has more than tripled over the past 15 years, rising from about $500bn in 2007 to $1.6tn today.</div>
<div></div>
<div>Continue reading <a href="https://news.yahoo.com/us-supreme-court-strikes-down-144330233.html">HERE</a></div>
<div></div>
</div>
<div><strong>Source:</strong> https://news.yahoo.com/us-supreme-court-strikes-down-144330233.html</div>
<div>
<hr />
</div>
<div>[<a href="https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org/news/disclaimer/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Disclaimer</a>]</div><p>The post <a href="https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org/us-supreme-court-strikes-down-student-loan-forgiveness-plan/">US Supreme Court strikes down student loan forgiveness plan</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.garnertedarmstrong.org">Garner Ted Armstrong Evangelistic Association</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
